Mitigating the systemic loss of nitrous oxide: a narrative review and data-driven practice analysis

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.028
Brian B. Chesebro , Seema Gandhi
{"title":"Mitigating the systemic loss of nitrous oxide: a narrative review and data-driven practice analysis","authors":"Brian B. Chesebro ,&nbsp;Seema Gandhi","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the negative health impacts of climate change, clinicians have a fundamental responsibility to take an active role in mitigating the environmental impact of their practices. Inhaled anaesthetics are potent greenhouse gases, including nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), with their long atmospheric lifetime, high global warming potential, and ozone-depleting properties. However, few clinicians realise that losses from central N<sub>2</sub>O supply systems account for the vast majority of overall N<sub>2</sub>O consumption in healthcare. Central N<sub>2</sub>O supply systems are standard in most facilities, compounding the impact of these under-recognised, unnecessary greenhouse gas emissions. We review the environmental impact of N<sub>2</sub>O in healthcare, offer N<sub>2</sub>O utilisation data from 47 hospitals in the USA, and provide clinician-targeted guidance for mitigating these widespread N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Consistent with findings from the UK and Australia, data from two large US healthcare systems reveal significant nonclinical N<sub>2</sub>O losses of 47.2–99.8% of total procured N<sub>2</sub>O. As illustrated in one quaternary medical centre, the transition from central to portable supply systems reduced overall N<sub>2</sub>O consumption by 97.6%. To date, this mitigation initiative has been successfully implemented at over 25 hospitals in our system. Raising awareness of this considerable source of healthcare-specific N<sub>2</sub>O emissions empowers clinicians to spearhead facility-level engagement and action. As healthcare leaders, clinicians should advocate for decarbonisation of clinical practices and systems while ensuring high-quality patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"133 6","pages":"Pages 1413-1418"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224005099","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the negative health impacts of climate change, clinicians have a fundamental responsibility to take an active role in mitigating the environmental impact of their practices. Inhaled anaesthetics are potent greenhouse gases, including nitrous oxide (N2O), with their long atmospheric lifetime, high global warming potential, and ozone-depleting properties. However, few clinicians realise that losses from central N2O supply systems account for the vast majority of overall N2O consumption in healthcare. Central N2O supply systems are standard in most facilities, compounding the impact of these under-recognised, unnecessary greenhouse gas emissions. We review the environmental impact of N2O in healthcare, offer N2O utilisation data from 47 hospitals in the USA, and provide clinician-targeted guidance for mitigating these widespread N2O emissions. Consistent with findings from the UK and Australia, data from two large US healthcare systems reveal significant nonclinical N2O losses of 47.2–99.8% of total procured N2O. As illustrated in one quaternary medical centre, the transition from central to portable supply systems reduced overall N2O consumption by 97.6%. To date, this mitigation initiative has been successfully implemented at over 25 hospitals in our system. Raising awareness of this considerable source of healthcare-specific N2O emissions empowers clinicians to spearhead facility-level engagement and action. As healthcare leaders, clinicians should advocate for decarbonisation of clinical practices and systems while ensuring high-quality patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减轻一氧化二氮的系统性损失:叙述性回顾和数据驱动的实践分析。
鉴于气候变化对健康造成的负面影响,临床医生在减轻其诊疗活动对环境的影响方面负有根本性的责任。吸入麻醉剂是一种强效温室气体,包括一氧化二氮 (N2O),其在大气中的停留时间长、全球升温潜能值高且具有消耗臭氧的特性。然而,很少有临床医生意识到,中央一氧化二氮供应系统的损失占医疗保健领域一氧化二氮总消耗量的绝大部分。中央一氧化二氮供应系统是大多数设施的标准配置,加剧了这些未得到充分认识的不必要温室气体排放的影响。我们回顾了一氧化二氮对医疗环境的影响,提供了来自美国 47 家医院的一氧化二氮使用数据,并为临床医生提供了有针对性的指导,以减少这些广泛存在的一氧化二氮排放。与英国和澳大利亚的研究结果一致,来自美国两家大型医疗系统的数据显示,非临床的一氧化二氮损失量占采购一氧化二氮总量的 47.2%-99.8%。一个四级医疗中心的情况表明,从中央供应系统过渡到便携式供应系统后,一氧化二氮的总消耗量减少了 97.6%。迄今为止,这一缓解措施已在我们系统内超过 25 家医院成功实施。提高临床医生对这一相当大的医疗专用一氧化二氮排放源的认识,使他们能够带头参与设施层面的工作和行动。作为医疗保健领域的领导者,临床医生应倡导临床实践和系统的低碳化,同时确保高质量的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
A critical approach to research on perioperative pain management. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the perioperative period: current controversies and concerns. Aperiodic component of the electroencephalogram power spectrum reflects the hypnotic level of anaesthesia. Comparison of different monitors for measurement of nociception during general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Differences in anaesthesiologist-surgeon seniority and patient safety: a single-centre mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1