Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2019

Ibrahim Mohammed Hussaini , Ahmed Babagida Suleiman , Olayeni Stephen Olonitola , Rukayat Avosuahi Oyi
{"title":"Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2019","authors":"Ibrahim Mohammed Hussaini ,&nbsp;Ahmed Babagida Suleiman ,&nbsp;Olayeni Stephen Olonitola ,&nbsp;Rukayat Avosuahi Oyi","doi":"10.1016/j.microb.2024.100174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rise in the prevalence of carbapenem resistant bacteria worldwide has made the treatment of nosocomial infections challenging. This is because carbapenem resistant bacteria harbor multiple resistance genes aside the carbapenemase genes. This study was conducted to determine the susceptibility pattern of carbapenem resistant isolates of <em>Escherichia coli</em> and <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae.</em> Previously isolated and characterized carbapenem resistant <em>E. coli</em> and <em>K. pneumoniae</em> were screened for their susceptibility to ceftriaxone, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, doxycycline, amikacin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, chloramphenicol, colistin, tigecycline and fosfomycin by the Kirby Bauer technique. EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints were used to interpret the zones of inhibition. High level of resistance was observed among the isolates to ceftriaxone (100.00 %), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (100.00 %) and doxycycline (83.33 %). Two-third of the isolates (66.67 %) were observed to be susceptible to amikacin, while 33.33 % of the isolates were gentamicin and nalidixic acid susceptible. Susceptibility to chloramphenicol and colistin was recorded in 16.67 % of the isolates while all the screened isolates (100.0 %) were susceptible to fosfomycin and tigecycline. A higher antibiotic resistance rate was observed among isolates habouring carbapenemase genes (<em>bla</em><sub>NDM</sub>, <em>bla</em><sub>OXA</sub> or both). The MAR indices of the carbapenem resistant isolates ranged between 0.46 and 0.82. So also, all the isolates screened were observed to be resistant to multiple antibiotics, hence MDR isolates. In conclusion, the carbapenem resistant isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics but were however susceptible to tigecycline, fosfomycin and amikacin.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101246,"journal":{"name":"The Microbe","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950194624001419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise in the prevalence of carbapenem resistant bacteria worldwide has made the treatment of nosocomial infections challenging. This is because carbapenem resistant bacteria harbor multiple resistance genes aside the carbapenemase genes. This study was conducted to determine the susceptibility pattern of carbapenem resistant isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Previously isolated and characterized carbapenem resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae were screened for their susceptibility to ceftriaxone, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, doxycycline, amikacin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, chloramphenicol, colistin, tigecycline and fosfomycin by the Kirby Bauer technique. EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints were used to interpret the zones of inhibition. High level of resistance was observed among the isolates to ceftriaxone (100.00 %), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (100.00 %) and doxycycline (83.33 %). Two-third of the isolates (66.67 %) were observed to be susceptible to amikacin, while 33.33 % of the isolates were gentamicin and nalidixic acid susceptible. Susceptibility to chloramphenicol and colistin was recorded in 16.67 % of the isolates while all the screened isolates (100.0 %) were susceptible to fosfomycin and tigecycline. A higher antibiotic resistance rate was observed among isolates habouring carbapenemase genes (blaNDM, blaOXA or both). The MAR indices of the carbapenem resistant isolates ranged between 0.46 and 0.82. So also, all the isolates screened were observed to be resistant to multiple antibiotics, hence MDR isolates. In conclusion, the carbapenem resistant isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics but were however susceptible to tigecycline, fosfomycin and amikacin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019 年耐碳青霉烯类大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的抗生素敏感性模式
全球范围内耐碳青霉烯类细菌感染率的上升使治疗院内感染成为一项挑战。这是因为除了碳青霉烯酶基因外,耐碳青霉烯类细菌还携带多种耐药基因。本研究旨在确定对碳青霉烯类耐药的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的耐药模式。通过柯比鲍尔(Kirby Bauer)技术筛选了之前分离到的对碳青霉烯类耐药的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌,以确定它们对头孢曲松、三甲氧苄青霉素-磺胺甲恶唑、强力霉素、阿米卡星、庆大霉素、萘啶酸、氯霉素、可乐定、替加环素和磷霉素的敏感性。采用 EUCAST 和 CLSI 断点来解释抑菌区。分离菌株对头孢曲松(100.00%)、三甲双氨苄-磺胺甲噁唑(100.00%)和强力霉素(83.33%)的耐药性较高。据观察,三分之二的分离物(66.67%)对阿米卡星敏感,33.33%的分离物对庆大霉素和萘啶酸敏感。16.67% 的分离菌株对氯霉素和可乐定敏感,而所有筛选出的分离菌株(100.0%)都对磷霉素和替加环素敏感。在携带碳青霉烯酶基因(blaNDM、blaOXA 或两者)的分离物中,观察到较高的抗生素耐药率。耐碳青霉烯酶分离物的 MAR 指数介于 0.46 和 0.82 之间。因此,筛选出的所有分离菌株都对多种抗生素具有耐药性,即 MDR 分离菌株。总之,耐碳青霉烯类抗生素的分离物对多种抗生素具有耐药性,但对替加环素、磷霉素和阿米卡星敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the effect of probiotics and specific bacteriophages on the biofilm formed by Streptococcus mutans Examining alternative approaches to antibiotic utilisation: A critical evaluation of phage therapy and antimicrobial peptides combination as potential alternatives Assessment of microbial diversity and antimicrobial resistance in raw camel milk: Genomic and phenotypic analysis of Kharai and Kutchi breeds of Gujarat, India Comparison of fecal bacteriome of diarrhoeic and non-diarrhoeic calves revealed diversified community structures Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A comprehensive review of phenotypic and genotypic methods for detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1