Zhiwei Ye , Jianhua Yang , Ming Chen , Chi Yao , Xiaobo Zhang , Yongli Ma , Chuangbing Zhou
{"title":"Difference in rock-breaking characteristics between water-coupling blasting and air-coupling blasting","authors":"Zhiwei Ye , Jianhua Yang , Ming Chen , Chi Yao , Xiaobo Zhang , Yongli Ma , Chuangbing Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The water-coupling blasting (WCB) technology has received widespread attention due to its advantages of high efficiency and environmental protection. However, the parameters of WCB in practical engineering are generally determined based on the experience and standards of air-coupling blasting (ACB), leading to poor blasting effects and wastage of explosive energy. The study focuses on comparing the rock-breaking effects of shock waves and explosive gases between WCB and ACB to offer insights for optimizing the design of WCB. Firstly, the stress field in blasting with different coupling mediums was calculated. Then, the shock failure characteristics of rocks between WCB and ACB were analyzed. The results show that the radius of shock failure zones decreases with the increasing decoupling coefficient in WCB and ACB. On this basis, a model for calculating the shock failure range in WCB and ACB was proposed. This model can be utilized to estimate the percentage of fine-grained stone in the two types of blasting. Further, a method for distinguishing between the rock-breaking effects of shock waves and explosive gases was proposed based on the numerical simulation results of blasting damage. A comparative analysis between WCB and ACB on the rock-breaking volume by shock waves and gases was conducted. The results indicate that the failure volumes of rocks induced by shock waves and gases in WCB are 1.4–2.1 times greater than those in ACB, with a decoupling coefficient ranging from 1.26 to 1.71. Finally, a method for determining the charging structure in WCB was discussed, which has been preliminarily validated by field tests. The findings can help regulate rock-breaking effects in blasting by rationally selecting coupling mediums and charging constructions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54941,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 105924"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160924002892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The water-coupling blasting (WCB) technology has received widespread attention due to its advantages of high efficiency and environmental protection. However, the parameters of WCB in practical engineering are generally determined based on the experience and standards of air-coupling blasting (ACB), leading to poor blasting effects and wastage of explosive energy. The study focuses on comparing the rock-breaking effects of shock waves and explosive gases between WCB and ACB to offer insights for optimizing the design of WCB. Firstly, the stress field in blasting with different coupling mediums was calculated. Then, the shock failure characteristics of rocks between WCB and ACB were analyzed. The results show that the radius of shock failure zones decreases with the increasing decoupling coefficient in WCB and ACB. On this basis, a model for calculating the shock failure range in WCB and ACB was proposed. This model can be utilized to estimate the percentage of fine-grained stone in the two types of blasting. Further, a method for distinguishing between the rock-breaking effects of shock waves and explosive gases was proposed based on the numerical simulation results of blasting damage. A comparative analysis between WCB and ACB on the rock-breaking volume by shock waves and gases was conducted. The results indicate that the failure volumes of rocks induced by shock waves and gases in WCB are 1.4–2.1 times greater than those in ACB, with a decoupling coefficient ranging from 1.26 to 1.71. Finally, a method for determining the charging structure in WCB was discussed, which has been preliminarily validated by field tests. The findings can help regulate rock-breaking effects in blasting by rationally selecting coupling mediums and charging constructions.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences focuses on original research, new developments, site measurements, and case studies within the fields of rock mechanics and rock engineering. Serving as an international platform, it showcases high-quality papers addressing rock mechanics and the application of its principles and techniques in mining and civil engineering projects situated on or within rock masses. These projects encompass a wide range, including slopes, open-pit mines, quarries, shafts, tunnels, caverns, underground mines, metro systems, dams, hydro-electric stations, geothermal energy, petroleum engineering, and radioactive waste disposal. The journal welcomes submissions on various topics, with particular interest in theoretical advancements, analytical and numerical methods, rock testing, site investigation, and case studies.