Simulation-based training to improve provider-preparedness for amniotic fluid embolism: A lived experience

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101617
Kristen Bertrand DNP, CRNA , Julie Pearson PhD, CRNA , Casey Toler MSN, AGCNS-BC, RNC-OB, IBCLC , Virginia C. Simmons DNP, CRNA, CHSE-A, FAANA, FAAN
{"title":"Simulation-based training to improve provider-preparedness for amniotic fluid embolism: A lived experience","authors":"Kristen Bertrand DNP, CRNA ,&nbsp;Julie Pearson PhD, CRNA ,&nbsp;Casey Toler MSN, AGCNS-BC, RNC-OB, IBCLC ,&nbsp;Virginia C. Simmons DNP, CRNA, CHSE-A, FAANA, FAAN","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare, yet deadly obstetric (OB) crisis. Simulation-based training (SBT) can promote provider self-confidence and protocol adherence for multidisciplinary OB care teams during AFE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two multidisciplinary samples of participants were included in this quality improvement project. Sample 1 engaged in SBT for which they were assessed for confidence and protocol adherence at three timepoints: baseline, immediate post-simulation and four months post-simulation. During the implementation phase of this project, an inpatient experienced AFE, leading to increased staff interest in AFE education and training and the need for a second sample.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sample 1: Significant improvement was shown for all confidence items between baseline and initial post-simulation assessments (<em>p</em> &lt; .05) which was sustained at four months post-simulation. Significant improvement in protocol adherence scores were shown between the baseline and repeat simulations (<em>p</em> = .004) which were sustained at four months. Sample 2: Significant improvement was noted for 4 out of 5 confidence items between pre- and post-simulation confidence assessments (<em>p</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This project demonstrated that SBT contributed to increased confidence in management of AFE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101617"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924001099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare, yet deadly obstetric (OB) crisis. Simulation-based training (SBT) can promote provider self-confidence and protocol adherence for multidisciplinary OB care teams during AFE.

Methods

Two multidisciplinary samples of participants were included in this quality improvement project. Sample 1 engaged in SBT for which they were assessed for confidence and protocol adherence at three timepoints: baseline, immediate post-simulation and four months post-simulation. During the implementation phase of this project, an inpatient experienced AFE, leading to increased staff interest in AFE education and training and the need for a second sample.

Results

Sample 1: Significant improvement was shown for all confidence items between baseline and initial post-simulation assessments (p < .05) which was sustained at four months post-simulation. Significant improvement in protocol adherence scores were shown between the baseline and repeat simulations (p = .004) which were sustained at four months. Sample 2: Significant improvement was noted for 4 out of 5 confidence items between pre- and post-simulation confidence assessments (p < .001).

Conclusion

This project demonstrated that SBT contributed to increased confidence in management of AFE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过模拟培训,提高医护人员对羊水栓塞的防范能力:亲身经历
背景羊水栓塞(AFE)是一种罕见但致命的产科(OB)危机。模拟培训(SBT)可增强产科多学科护理团队在发生 AFE 时的自信心并促进其遵守规程。样本 1 参与了 SBT,并在三个时间点(基线、模拟后即刻和模拟后四个月)对他们的自信心和方案依从性进行了评估。在该项目的实施阶段,一名住院病人经历了 AFE,导致员工对 AFE 教育和培训的兴趣增加,因此需要进行第二次抽样调查。结果样本 1:在基线和模拟后初始评估之间,所有信心项目均有显著改善(p <.05),并在模拟后四个月内保持不变。在基线和重复模拟之间,协议遵守评分有了显著提高(p = .004),并在四个月后保持不变。样本 2:在模拟前和模拟后的信心评估中,5 个信心项目中有 4 个有显著提高(p = .001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Competency-based education: Simulation educators, don't be Afraid! These sims are different! Thematic analysis of interdisciplinary faculty experiences designing virtual simulations Medication safety simulation training for anesthesia professionals Perioperative inter-professional education training enhance team performance and readiness Breaking down blood transfusion administration: An in-scenario debriefing simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1