{"title":"An Efficient Data-Driven Framework for Detecting Infeasible Solutions in Multiobjective Evolutionary Bilevel Optimization","authors":"Jesús-Adolfo Mejía-de-Dios;Alejandro Rodríguez-Molina;Efrén Mezura-Montes","doi":"10.1109/TEVC.2024.3469156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detecting infeasible solutions is an important challenge in closed-box multiobjective bilevel optimization (MOBO) due to a lower-level (LL) optimization problem used as a constraint (along with equality and inequality constraints) in an upper-level optimization. In this context, a feasible solution is an optimal solution to the LL problem, typically addressed using evolutionary algorithms (EAs) (or other metaheuristics) for complex scenarios. Since metaheuristics do not guarantee optimality, then infeasible solutions are inherently reported. This article introduces a novel data-driven framework to automatically identify infeasible solutions reported by bilevel EAs (BEA) when addressing any MOBO problem. This framework operates without imposing strong assumptions on objectives or constraints, making it versatile and easy to implement. Besides, our approach uses solutions reported by one or multiple BEAs to detect and eliminate possible infeasible solutions. This approach helps to enhance algorithm comparison by eliminating infeasible solutions before applying existing performance indicators. The framework is successfully applied to several MOBO problems, including two real-world instances from specialized literature, solved by four different BEAs. Results suggest that the proposed framework advances the field of bilevel evolutionary optimization, offering a tool for promoting fair algorithmic comparisons and ensuring solution feasibility without requiring a deep understanding of the problem context.","PeriodicalId":13206,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation","volume":"29 5","pages":"2131-2144"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10697221/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Detecting infeasible solutions is an important challenge in closed-box multiobjective bilevel optimization (MOBO) due to a lower-level (LL) optimization problem used as a constraint (along with equality and inequality constraints) in an upper-level optimization. In this context, a feasible solution is an optimal solution to the LL problem, typically addressed using evolutionary algorithms (EAs) (or other metaheuristics) for complex scenarios. Since metaheuristics do not guarantee optimality, then infeasible solutions are inherently reported. This article introduces a novel data-driven framework to automatically identify infeasible solutions reported by bilevel EAs (BEA) when addressing any MOBO problem. This framework operates without imposing strong assumptions on objectives or constraints, making it versatile and easy to implement. Besides, our approach uses solutions reported by one or multiple BEAs to detect and eliminate possible infeasible solutions. This approach helps to enhance algorithm comparison by eliminating infeasible solutions before applying existing performance indicators. The framework is successfully applied to several MOBO problems, including two real-world instances from specialized literature, solved by four different BEAs. Results suggest that the proposed framework advances the field of bilevel evolutionary optimization, offering a tool for promoting fair algorithmic comparisons and ensuring solution feasibility without requiring a deep understanding of the problem context.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation is published by the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society on behalf of 13 societies: Circuits and Systems; Computer; Control Systems; Engineering in Medicine and Biology; Industrial Electronics; Industry Applications; Lasers and Electro-Optics; Oceanic Engineering; Power Engineering; Robotics and Automation; Signal Processing; Social Implications of Technology; and Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. The journal publishes original papers in evolutionary computation and related areas such as nature-inspired algorithms, population-based methods, optimization, and hybrid systems. It welcomes both purely theoretical papers and application papers that provide general insights into these areas of computation.