Experiences and Understanding of Well‐Being in Lung Transplant Recipients in China: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1111/jan.16479
Liqin Song, Chunqin Liu, Ying Zhou, Chunrong Ju, Qing Luo, Jing Cheng, Danxia Huang, Huifang Chen, Jiani Chen, Wenying Tan, Xinyang Hu, Yimeng Liu, Graeme D. Smith
{"title":"Experiences and Understanding of Well‐Being in Lung Transplant Recipients in China: A Phenomenological Qualitative Study","authors":"Liqin Song, Chunqin Liu, Ying Zhou, Chunrong Ju, Qing Luo, Jing Cheng, Danxia Huang, Huifang Chen, Jiani Chen, Wenying Tan, Xinyang Hu, Yimeng Liu, Graeme D. Smith","doi":"10.1111/jan.16479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo explore lung transplant recipients' perceptions of well‐being when they are facing uncertain health outcomes, including identifying the factors to enhance well‐being.DesignA qualitative descriptive study.MethodsA purposive sample of 11 lung transplantation recipients who were hospitalised in the Department of Organ Transplantation of a tertiary university hospital was recruited in China. A descriptive qualitative study using thematic analysis of semistructured interviews. Themes were organised within a PERMA model. <jats:italic>Colaizzi's</jats:italic> qualitative analysis was used to analyse the data.ResultsFive major themes and 11 categories were generated: (1) mindset shift [optimism and hope and living in the moment]; (2) meaning in life [self‐care, priority change and value realisation]; (3) health benefits [improved health and behavioural changes]; (4) perceived support [support from family, the health care team and others]; (5) unmet support needs.ConclusionLung transplant recipients could perceive well‐being from five aspects that caused significantly favourable transformation across a variety of aspects in patients' lives. These findings may support nursing staff when caring for this patient group, making them aware of multifaceted nature of well‐being. They could offer insight into potential pathways for the development of nurse‐led tailored interventions, based on specific elements of PERMA model.ImpactThis work adds to a growing body of knowledge about well‐being amongst lung transplant patients. These findings may support nursing staff when caring for this patient group, making them aware of multifaceted nature of well‐being and illustrating factors that promote positive well‐being in this group, based on specific elements of PERMA model.Reporting MethodThis study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.Patient or Public ContributionTwo lung transplant recipients were involved in the early phases of this study. They helped in formulating the interview outline.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimTo explore lung transplant recipients' perceptions of well‐being when they are facing uncertain health outcomes, including identifying the factors to enhance well‐being.DesignA qualitative descriptive study.MethodsA purposive sample of 11 lung transplantation recipients who were hospitalised in the Department of Organ Transplantation of a tertiary university hospital was recruited in China. A descriptive qualitative study using thematic analysis of semistructured interviews. Themes were organised within a PERMA model. Colaizzi's qualitative analysis was used to analyse the data.ResultsFive major themes and 11 categories were generated: (1) mindset shift [optimism and hope and living in the moment]; (2) meaning in life [self‐care, priority change and value realisation]; (3) health benefits [improved health and behavioural changes]; (4) perceived support [support from family, the health care team and others]; (5) unmet support needs.ConclusionLung transplant recipients could perceive well‐being from five aspects that caused significantly favourable transformation across a variety of aspects in patients' lives. These findings may support nursing staff when caring for this patient group, making them aware of multifaceted nature of well‐being. They could offer insight into potential pathways for the development of nurse‐led tailored interventions, based on specific elements of PERMA model.ImpactThis work adds to a growing body of knowledge about well‐being amongst lung transplant patients. These findings may support nursing staff when caring for this patient group, making them aware of multifaceted nature of well‐being and illustrating factors that promote positive well‐being in this group, based on specific elements of PERMA model.Reporting MethodThis study followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.Patient or Public ContributionTwo lung transplant recipients were involved in the early phases of this study. They helped in formulating the interview outline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国肺移植受者对幸福的体验和理解:现象学定性研究
目的探讨肺移植受者在面临不确定的健康结果时对幸福感的看法,包括确定提高幸福感的因素。方法在中国招募了11名肺移植受者作为目的性样本,他们均在一家三级甲等大学医院器官移植科住院治疗。对半结构式访谈进行主题分析,进行描述性定性研究。采用 PERMA 模型组织主题。结果产生了五大主题和 11 个类别:(1) 心态转变[乐观、希望和活在当下];(2) 生命意义[自我护理、优先顺序改变和价值实现];(3) 健康益处[健康改善和行为改变];(4) 感知到的支持[来自家庭、医疗团队和其他人的支持];(5) 未满足的支持需求。结论肺移植受者可从五个方面感知幸福感,这五个方面在患者生活的各个方面都引起了显著的有利转变。这些发现可以帮助护理人员在护理这一患者群体时,使他们意识到幸福感的多面性。这些研究结果可以为护士主导的、基于 PERMA 模型特定要素的定制干预措施的潜在发展路径提供启示。这些研究结果可为护理人员在护理该患者群体时提供支持,使他们意识到幸福感的多面性,并根据 PERMA 模型的具体要素说明促进该群体积极幸福感的因素。他们帮助制定了访谈提纲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Preparing Graduate Nursing Students to Lead Nursing Green Teams: Approach and Identified Greening Opportunities and Solutions. A Comprehensive Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Different Infant Feeding Types: The Observational Study GREEN MOTHER. Exploring Emotional Well-Being and Support of Midwives Who Provide Termination of Pregnancy Care: An International Survey. Unconscious bias and (nursing) care. "I Am Forever Changed": A Phenomenological Study of the Existential Experiences of Parents of Children and Young People With Complex Care Needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1