{"title":"CeO2-modified monolithic ceramic foams for efficient catalytic ozonation of refractory organic pollutants in a continuous-flow reactor†","authors":"Yang Zhao , Wenfei Ding , Xiaochi Chen , Shuo Chen","doi":"10.1039/d4cy00710g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Heterogeneous catalytic ozonation is valid for the advanced oxidation of organic pollutants in wastewater, but it is usually used in the packing bed with granular supports/catalysts with considerable fluid resistance and unsatisfactory ozone utilization efficiency in practical wastewater treatment. Herein, CeO<sub>2</sub>-modified monolithic ceramic foams (CeO<sub>2</sub>/AlCF) were developed for the efficient catalytic ozonation of refractory organic pollutants in a continuous-flow mode. The TOC removal efficiency of phenol by CeO<sub>2</sub>/AlCF was about 80% with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 12 min. The system also showed high TOC removal efficiencies (68%–81%) for other organic pollutants including oxalic acid, 2,4-dimethylphenol, and <em>p</em>-nitrophenol. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the biological treatment effluent of petrochemical wastewater decreased from 136 mg L<sup>−1</sup> to 45.2 mg L<sup>−1</sup> with a COD removal efficiency of nearly 67%. The ozone utilization efficiencies of CeO<sub>2</sub>/AlCF ranged from 53% to 73%, which were much higher than those of granular catalysts (42–68%). The quenching experiments and EPR analysis revealed that the process followed a hydroxyl radical mechanism. H<sub>2</sub> temperature-programmed reduction (H<sub>2</sub>-TPR) analysis showed that the transition of Ce<sup>4+</sup> to Ce<sup>3+</sup> in CeO<sub>2</sub>/AlCF was much easier than that in CeO<sub>2</sub> and hence had a better catalytic capability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":66,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Science & Technology","volume":"14 19","pages":"Pages 5653-5661"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2044475324004817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Heterogeneous catalytic ozonation is valid for the advanced oxidation of organic pollutants in wastewater, but it is usually used in the packing bed with granular supports/catalysts with considerable fluid resistance and unsatisfactory ozone utilization efficiency in practical wastewater treatment. Herein, CeO2-modified monolithic ceramic foams (CeO2/AlCF) were developed for the efficient catalytic ozonation of refractory organic pollutants in a continuous-flow mode. The TOC removal efficiency of phenol by CeO2/AlCF was about 80% with a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 12 min. The system also showed high TOC removal efficiencies (68%–81%) for other organic pollutants including oxalic acid, 2,4-dimethylphenol, and p-nitrophenol. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) of the biological treatment effluent of petrochemical wastewater decreased from 136 mg L−1 to 45.2 mg L−1 with a COD removal efficiency of nearly 67%. The ozone utilization efficiencies of CeO2/AlCF ranged from 53% to 73%, which were much higher than those of granular catalysts (42–68%). The quenching experiments and EPR analysis revealed that the process followed a hydroxyl radical mechanism. H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) analysis showed that the transition of Ce4+ to Ce3+ in CeO2/AlCF was much easier than that in CeO2 and hence had a better catalytic capability.
期刊介绍:
A multidisciplinary journal focusing on cutting edge research across all fundamental science and technological aspects of catalysis.
Editor-in-chief: Bert Weckhuysen
Impact factor: 5.0
Time to first decision (peer reviewed only): 31 days