Single-Breath Simultaneous Measurement of DLNO and DLCO as Predictor of the Emphysema Component in COPD - A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pub Date : 2024-09-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/COPD.S467138
Roberto W Dal Negro, Paola Turco, Massimiliano Povero
{"title":"Single-Breath Simultaneous Measurement of DL<sub>NO</sub> and DL<sub>CO</sub> as Predictor of the Emphysema Component in COPD - A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Roberto W Dal Negro, Paola Turco, Massimiliano Povero","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S467138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a respiratory condition characterized by heterogeneous abnormalities of the airways and lung parenchyma that cause different clinical presentations. The assessment of the prevailing pathogenetic components underlying COPD is not usually pursued in daily practice, also due to technological limitations and cost.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess non-invasively the lung emphysema component of COPD by the simultaneous measurement of DL<sub>NO</sub> and DL<sub>CO</sub> via a single-breath (sDL<sub>NO</sub> and sDL<sub>CO</sub>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>COPD patients aged ≥40 years of both genders were recruited consecutively and labelled by computed tomography as \"with significant\" emphysema (>10% of CT lung volume) or \"with negligible\" emphysema otherwise. Current lung function tests such as sDL<sub>NO</sub>, sDL<sub>CO</sub> and Vc (the lung capillary blood volume) were measured. All possible subsets of independent spirometric and diffusive parameters were tested as predictors of emphysema, and their predicted power compared to each parameter alone by ROC analysis and area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients with \"significant emphysema\" were compared to thirty-one with \"negligible emphysema\". FEV<sub>1</sub> and FEV1/FVC seemed to be the best spirometric predictors (AUC 0.80 and 0.81, respectively), while sDL<sub>CO</sub> and Vc had the highest predicted power among diffusive parameters (AUC 0.92 and 0.94, respectively). sDL<sub>CO</sub> and Vc values were the parameters most correlated to the extent of CT emphysema. Six subsets of independent predictors were identified and included at least one spirometric and one diffusive parameter. According to goodness-to-fit scores (AIC, BIC, log-likelihood and pseudo R<sup>2</sup>), RV coupled with sDL<sub>CO</sub> or Vc proved the best predictors of emphysema.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When investigating the parenchymal destructive component due to emphysema occurring in COPD, sDL<sub>NO</sub>, sDL<sub>CO</sub> and Vc do enhance the predictive power of current spirometric measures substantially. sDL<sub>NO</sub>, sDL<sub>CO</sub> and Vc contribute to phenotype of the main pathogenetic components of COPD easily and with high sensitivity. Organizational problems, radiation exposure, time and costs could be reduced, while personalized and precision medicine could be noticeably implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"2123-2133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11439895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S467138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a respiratory condition characterized by heterogeneous abnormalities of the airways and lung parenchyma that cause different clinical presentations. The assessment of the prevailing pathogenetic components underlying COPD is not usually pursued in daily practice, also due to technological limitations and cost.

Aim: To assess non-invasively the lung emphysema component of COPD by the simultaneous measurement of DLNO and DLCO via a single-breath (sDLNO and sDLCO).

Methods: COPD patients aged ≥40 years of both genders were recruited consecutively and labelled by computed tomography as "with significant" emphysema (>10% of CT lung volume) or "with negligible" emphysema otherwise. Current lung function tests such as sDLNO, sDLCO and Vc (the lung capillary blood volume) were measured. All possible subsets of independent spirometric and diffusive parameters were tested as predictors of emphysema, and their predicted power compared to each parameter alone by ROC analysis and area under the curve (AUC).

Results: Thirty-one patients with "significant emphysema" were compared to thirty-one with "negligible emphysema". FEV1 and FEV1/FVC seemed to be the best spirometric predictors (AUC 0.80 and 0.81, respectively), while sDLCO and Vc had the highest predicted power among diffusive parameters (AUC 0.92 and 0.94, respectively). sDLCO and Vc values were the parameters most correlated to the extent of CT emphysema. Six subsets of independent predictors were identified and included at least one spirometric and one diffusive parameter. According to goodness-to-fit scores (AIC, BIC, log-likelihood and pseudo R2), RV coupled with sDLCO or Vc proved the best predictors of emphysema.

Conclusion: When investigating the parenchymal destructive component due to emphysema occurring in COPD, sDLNO, sDLCO and Vc do enhance the predictive power of current spirometric measures substantially. sDLNO, sDLCO and Vc contribute to phenotype of the main pathogenetic components of COPD easily and with high sensitivity. Organizational problems, radiation exposure, time and costs could be reduced, while personalized and precision medicine could be noticeably implemented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单次呼吸同时测量 DLNO 和 DLCO 作为 COPD 肺气肿成分的预测指标 - 一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种呼吸系统疾病,其特点是气道和肺实质出现异常,导致不同的临床表现。目的:通过单次呼吸同时测量 DLNO 和 DLCO(sDLNO 和 sDLCO),无创评估 COPD 的肺气肿成分:方法:连续招募年龄≥40 岁的慢性阻塞性肺病患者,男女患者均有,并通过计算机断层扫描将其标记为 "明显 "肺气肿(> CT 肺容积的 10%)或 "可忽略 "肺气肿。测量了当前的肺功能测试,如 sDLNO、sDLCO 和 Vc(肺毛细血管血容量)。将所有可能的独立肺活量和弥散参数子集作为肺气肿的预测因子进行了测试,并通过 ROC 分析和曲线下面积(AUC)将其预测能力与单独的每个参数进行了比较:31名 "明显肺气肿 "患者与31名 "可忽略肺气肿 "患者进行了比较。FEV1 和 FEV1/FVC 似乎是最好的肺活量预测指标(AUC 分别为 0.80 和 0.81),而 sDLCO 和 Vc 在弥散参数中的预测能力最高(AUC 分别为 0.92 和 0.94)。确定了六个独立预测因子子集,其中至少包括一个肺活量参数和一个弥散参数。根据拟合优度评分(AIC、BIC、对数似然比和假 R2),RV 与 sDLCO 或 Vc 被证明是肺气肿的最佳预测指标:sDLNO、sDLCO 和 Vc 可显著提高现有肺活量测量的预测能力。可以减少组织问题、辐射暴露、时间和成本,同时显著实现个性化和精准医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Physical Activity and Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry: A Cross-Sectional NHANES Study. Red Blood Cell Distribution Width/Hematocrit Ratio: A New Predictor of 28 Days All-Cause Mortality of AECOPD Patients in ICU. Emerging Anti-Inflammatory COPD Treatments: Potential Cardiovascular Impacts. The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Predictive Model of Obstructive Disease in Post-Tuberculosis Patients. A Qualitative Study on Illness Perception and Coping Behaviors Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Implications for Intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1