Predicting recurrence of instability after a primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-1454.R1
Navnit S Makaram, Hannes Becher, Erlend Oag, Nicholas R Heinz, Conor J McCann, Samuel P Mackenzie, C M Robinson
{"title":"Predicting recurrence of instability after a primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.","authors":"Navnit S Makaram, Hannes Becher, Erlend Oag, Nicholas R Heinz, Conor J McCann, Samuel P Mackenzie, C M Robinson","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-1454.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The risk factors for recurrent instability (RI) following a primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (PTASD) remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the rate of RI in a large cohort of patients managed nonoperatively after PTASD and to develop a clinical prediction model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1,293 patients with PTASD managed nonoperatively were identified from a trauma database (mean age 23.3 years (15 to 35); 14.3% female). We assessed the prevalence of RI, and used multivariate regression modelling to evaluate which demographic- and injury-related factors were independently predictive for its occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall rate of RI at a mean follow-up of 34.4 months (SD 47.0) was 62.8% (n = 812), with 81.0% (n = 658) experiencing their first recurrence within two years of PTASD. The median time for recurrence was 9.8 months (IQR 3.9 to 19.4). Independent predictors increasing risk of RI included male sex (p < 0.001), younger age at PTASD (p < 0.001), participation in contact sport (p < 0.001), and the presence of a bony Bankart (BB) lesion (p = 0.028). Greater tuberosity fracture (GTF) was protective (p < 0.001). However, the discriminative ability of the resulting predictive model for two-year risk of RI was poor (area under the curve (AUC) 0.672). A subset analysis excluding identifiable radiological predictors of BB and GTF worsened the predictive ability (AUC 0.646).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study clarifies the prevalence and risk factors for RI following PTASD in a large, unselected patient cohort. Although these data permitted the development of a predictive tool for RI, its discriminative ability was poor. Predicting RI remains challenging, and as-yet-undetermined risk factors may be important in determining the risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-1454.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The risk factors for recurrent instability (RI) following a primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (PTASD) remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the rate of RI in a large cohort of patients managed nonoperatively after PTASD and to develop a clinical prediction model.

Methods: A total of 1,293 patients with PTASD managed nonoperatively were identified from a trauma database (mean age 23.3 years (15 to 35); 14.3% female). We assessed the prevalence of RI, and used multivariate regression modelling to evaluate which demographic- and injury-related factors were independently predictive for its occurrence.

Results: The overall rate of RI at a mean follow-up of 34.4 months (SD 47.0) was 62.8% (n = 812), with 81.0% (n = 658) experiencing their first recurrence within two years of PTASD. The median time for recurrence was 9.8 months (IQR 3.9 to 19.4). Independent predictors increasing risk of RI included male sex (p < 0.001), younger age at PTASD (p < 0.001), participation in contact sport (p < 0.001), and the presence of a bony Bankart (BB) lesion (p = 0.028). Greater tuberosity fracture (GTF) was protective (p < 0.001). However, the discriminative ability of the resulting predictive model for two-year risk of RI was poor (area under the curve (AUC) 0.672). A subset analysis excluding identifiable radiological predictors of BB and GTF worsened the predictive ability (AUC 0.646).

Conclusion: This study clarifies the prevalence and risk factors for RI following PTASD in a large, unselected patient cohort. Although these data permitted the development of a predictive tool for RI, its discriminative ability was poor. Predicting RI remains challenging, and as-yet-undetermined risk factors may be important in determining the risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性外伤性肩关节前脱位后不稳定复发的预测。
目的:原发性外伤性肩关节前脱位(PTASD)后复发性不稳定(RI)的风险因素仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定一大批接受非手术治疗的 PTASD 患者的 RI 发生率,并建立一个临床预测模型:方法:我们从创伤数据库中找到了 1293 名接受非手术治疗的 PTASD 患者(平均年龄 23.3 岁(15 至 35 岁);14.3% 为女性)。我们评估了RI的患病率,并使用多变量回归模型评估了哪些人口统计学和损伤相关因素可独立预测RI的发生:平均随访 34.4 个月(SD 47.0)后,RI 的总发生率为 62.8%(n = 812),其中 81.0%(n = 658)的患者在 PTASD 后两年内首次复发。复发的中位时间为 9.8 个月(IQR 3.9 至 19.4)。增加复发风险的独立预测因素包括男性(p < 0.001)、患 PTASD 时年龄较小(p < 0.001)、参与接触性运动(p < 0.001)和存在骨性 Bankart (BB) 病变(p = 0.028)。大结节骨折(GTF)具有保护作用(p < 0.001)。然而,由此得出的 RI 两年风险预测模型的判别能力较差(曲线下面积 (AUC) 0.672)。排除 BB 和 GTF 的可识别放射学预测因子的子集分析使预测能力更差(AUC 0.646):本研究阐明了在一个未经选择的大型患者队列中 PTASD 后 RI 的患病率和风险因素。虽然这些数据有助于开发 RI 的预测工具,但其鉴别能力较差。预测 RI 仍具有挑战性,尚未确定的风险因素可能是决定风险的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
A focus on the Shoulder and Elbow in 2024. Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose? Association between surgeon and hospital volume and outcome of first-time revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic loosening. Characterization of articular lesions associated with glenohumeral instability using arthroscopy. Elbow kinematics with increased lengthening of a radial head arthroplasty evaluated with dynamic radiostereometric analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1