Preoperative patient-reported outcome measures predict minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptomatic state following arthroscopic Bankart repair.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0395.R1
Yi Long, Zhen-Ze Zheng, Xin-Hao Li, De-Dong Cui, Xing-Hao Deng, Jiang Guo, Rui Yang
{"title":"Preoperative patient-reported outcome measures predict minimal clinically important difference and patient-acceptable symptomatic state following arthroscopic Bankart repair.","authors":"Yi Long, Zhen-Ze Zheng, Xin-Hao Li, De-Dong Cui, Xing-Hao Deng, Jiang Guo, Rui Yang","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0395.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aims of this study were to validate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rowe score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores following arthroscopic Bankart repair, and to identify preoperative threshold values of these scores that could predict the achievement of MCID and PASS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 131 consecutive patients with anterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between January 2020 and January 2023. Inclusion criteria required at least one episode of shoulder instability and a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Preoperative and one-year postoperative scores were assessed. MCID and PASS were estimated using distribution-based and anchor-based methods, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined preoperative patient-reported outcome measure thresholds predictive of achieving MCID and PASS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MCID thresholds were determined as 169.6, 6.8, 7.2, and 1.1 for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS, respectively. PASS thresholds were calculated as ≤ 480, ≥ 80, ≥ 87, and ≤ 1 for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS, respectively. Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 760 (WOSI) and ≤ 50 (Rowe) predicted achieving MCID for WOSI score (p < 0.001). Preoperative thresholds of ≤ 60 (ASES) and ≥ 2 (VAS) predicted achieving MCID for VAS score (p < 0.001). A preoperative threshold of ≥ 40 (Rowe) predicted achieving PASS for Rowe score (p = 0.005). Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 50 (ASES; p = 0.002) and ≤ 2 (VAS; p < 0.001) predicted achieving PASS for the ASES score. Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 43 (ASES; p = 0.046) and ≤ 4 (VAS; p = 0.024) predicted achieving PASS for the VAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study defined MCID and PASS values for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS scores in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. Higher preoperative functional scores may reduce the likelihood of achieving MCID but increase the likelihood of achieving the PASS. These findings provide valuable guidance for surgeons to counsel patients realistically regarding their expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 10","pages":"1118-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0395.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aims of this study were to validate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rowe score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores following arthroscopic Bankart repair, and to identify preoperative threshold values of these scores that could predict the achievement of MCID and PASS.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 131 consecutive patients with anterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between January 2020 and January 2023. Inclusion criteria required at least one episode of shoulder instability and a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Preoperative and one-year postoperative scores were assessed. MCID and PASS were estimated using distribution-based and anchor-based methods, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined preoperative patient-reported outcome measure thresholds predictive of achieving MCID and PASS.

Results: MCID thresholds were determined as 169.6, 6.8, 7.2, and 1.1 for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS, respectively. PASS thresholds were calculated as ≤ 480, ≥ 80, ≥ 87, and ≤ 1 for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS, respectively. Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 760 (WOSI) and ≤ 50 (Rowe) predicted achieving MCID for WOSI score (p < 0.001). Preoperative thresholds of ≤ 60 (ASES) and ≥ 2 (VAS) predicted achieving MCID for VAS score (p < 0.001). A preoperative threshold of ≥ 40 (Rowe) predicted achieving PASS for Rowe score (p = 0.005). Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 50 (ASES; p = 0.002) and ≤ 2 (VAS; p < 0.001) predicted achieving PASS for the ASES score. Preoperative thresholds of ≥ 43 (ASES; p = 0.046) and ≤ 4 (VAS; p = 0.024) predicted achieving PASS for the VAS.

Conclusion: This study defined MCID and PASS values for WOSI, Rowe, ASES, and VAS scores in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. Higher preoperative functional scores may reduce the likelihood of achieving MCID but increase the likelihood of achieving the PASS. These findings provide valuable guidance for surgeons to counsel patients realistically regarding their expectations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前患者报告的结果指标可预测关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后的最小临床重要差异和患者可接受的症状状态。
目的:本研究旨在验证关节镜下Bankart修复术后西安大略肩关节不稳定性指数(WOSI)、Rowe评分、美国肩肘外科医生评分(ASES)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)阈值,并确定这些评分的术前阈值,以预测MCID和PASS的实现:对2020年1月至2023年1月期间接受关节镜Bankart修复术的131例连续肩关节前侧不稳定患者进行回顾性研究。纳入标准要求至少有一次肩关节不稳定发作,且至少随访 12 个月。对术前和术后一年的评分进行评估。分别采用基于分布的方法和基于锚的方法估算MCID和PASS。接收者操作特征曲线分析确定了可预测达到 MCID 和 PASS 的术前患者报告结果测量阈值:WOSI、Rowe、ASES 和 VAS 的 MCID 阈值分别为 169.6、6.8、7.2 和 1.1。WOSI、Rowe、ASES和VAS的PASS阈值分别为≤480、≥80、≥87和≤1。术前阈值≥ 760(WOSI)和≤ 50(Rowe)预示 WOSI 评分达到 MCID(p < 0.001)。术前阈值≤ 60(ASES)和≥ 2(VAS)可预测 VAS 评分达到 MCID(p < 0.001)。术前阈值≥40(Rowe)可预测 Rowe 评分达到 PASS(p = 0.005)。术前阈值≥50(ASES;p = 0.002)和≤2(VAS;p < 0.001)可预测 ASES 评分达到 PASS。术前阈值≥43(ASES;p = 0.046)和≤4(VAS;p = 0.024)可预测VAS评分达到PASS:本研究确定了接受关节镜Bankart修复术患者的WOSI、Rowe、ASES和VAS评分的MCID和PASS值。术前较高的功能评分可能会降低达到 MCID 的可能性,但会增加达到 PASS 的可能性。这些研究结果为外科医生提供了宝贵的指导,使他们能够就患者的期望值向患者提供现实的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics. Core Outcome Domains for Elbow Replacement (CODER). Defining multilevel developmental cervical spinal stenosis using MRI. Delayed fixation of distal radial fractures beyond three weeks after initial failed closed reduction increases the odds of reoperation. Detection, classification, and characterization of proximal humerus fractures on plain radiographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1