Staged revision of the infected knee arthroplasty and endoprosthesis.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-0432.R1
Christopher J Lodge, Amirul Adlan, Rajpal S Nandra, Jasprit Kaur, Lee Jeys, Jonathan D Stevenson
{"title":"Staged revision of the infected knee arthroplasty and endoprosthesis.","authors":"Christopher J Lodge, Amirul Adlan, Rajpal S Nandra, Jasprit Kaur, Lee Jeys, Jonathan D Stevenson","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-0432.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging complication of any arthroplasty procedure. We reviewed our use of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers (ABLCSs) for staged management of PJI where segmental bone loss, ligamentous instability, or soft-tissue defects necessitate a static construct. We reviewed factors contributing to their failure and techniques to avoid these complications when using ABLCSs in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of 94 patients undergoing first-stage revision of an infected knee prosthesis between September 2007 and January 2020 at a single institution. Radiographs and clinical records were used to assess and classify the incidence and causes of static spacer failure. Of the 94 cases, there were 19 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), ten revision TKAs (varus-valgus constraint), 20 hinged TKAs, one arthrodesis (nail), one failed spacer (performed elsewhere), 21 distal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasties, and 22 proximal tibial arthroplasties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35/94 patients (37.2%) had spacer-related complications, of which 26/35 complications (74.3%) were because of mechanical failure of the spacer construct, while 9/35 (25.7%) were due to recurrence of infection. Risk factors for internal failure were a construct where the total intramedullary spacer length was less than twice the length of the central osseous defect (p = 0.009), where proximal or distal intraosseous spacer contact was < 10%, and after tibial tubercle osteotomy (p = 0.005). The incidence of spacer complications significantly increased the time to second stage: mean 157 days (42 to 458) in those without complications versus 227 days (11 to 528) with complications (p = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The failure rate of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers is much higher than anticipated. Complications of the spacer significantly increased the time to second-stage revision. The risk of mechanical failure is significantly increased if the spacer is less than double the size of the segmental defect, or if inadequate reinforcement is inserted into the residual bone. These findings serve as a guide for surgeons to avoid mechanical complications with static spacers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2023-0432.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging complication of any arthroplasty procedure. We reviewed our use of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers (ABLCSs) for staged management of PJI where segmental bone loss, ligamentous instability, or soft-tissue defects necessitate a static construct. We reviewed factors contributing to their failure and techniques to avoid these complications when using ABLCSs in this context.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 94 patients undergoing first-stage revision of an infected knee prosthesis between September 2007 and January 2020 at a single institution. Radiographs and clinical records were used to assess and classify the incidence and causes of static spacer failure. Of the 94 cases, there were 19 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), ten revision TKAs (varus-valgus constraint), 20 hinged TKAs, one arthrodesis (nail), one failed spacer (performed elsewhere), 21 distal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasties, and 22 proximal tibial arthroplasties.

Results: A total of 35/94 patients (37.2%) had spacer-related complications, of which 26/35 complications (74.3%) were because of mechanical failure of the spacer construct, while 9/35 (25.7%) were due to recurrence of infection. Risk factors for internal failure were a construct where the total intramedullary spacer length was less than twice the length of the central osseous defect (p = 0.009), where proximal or distal intraosseous spacer contact was < 10%, and after tibial tubercle osteotomy (p = 0.005). The incidence of spacer complications significantly increased the time to second stage: mean 157 days (42 to 458) in those without complications versus 227 days (11 to 528) with complications (p = 0.014).

Conclusion: The failure rate of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers is much higher than anticipated. Complications of the spacer significantly increased the time to second-stage revision. The risk of mechanical failure is significantly increased if the spacer is less than double the size of the segmental defect, or if inadequate reinforcement is inserted into the residual bone. These findings serve as a guide for surgeons to avoid mechanical complications with static spacers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对受感染的膝关节假体和内假体进行分阶段翻修。
目的:假体周围关节感染(PJI)是任何关节成形术都会出现的一种具有挑战性的并发症。我们回顾了在节段性骨质缺失、韧带不稳定或软组织缺损导致必须使用静态结构的情况下,使用静态抗生素骨水泥垫片(ABLCS)对 PJI 进行分期治疗的情况。我们回顾了导致其失败的因素,以及在这种情况下使用 ABLCS 时避免这些并发症的技术:我们对一家医疗机构在2007年9月至2020年1月期间接受感染性膝关节假体第一阶段翻修手术的94名患者进行了回顾性分析。利用X光片和临床记录对静态垫片失效的发生率和原因进行评估和分类。在这94例病例中,有19例初次全膝关节置换术(TKAs)、10例翻修TKAs(屈曲-外翻约束)、20例铰链TKAs、1例关节固定术(钉)、1例间隔器失效(在其他地方进行)、21例股骨远端假体置换术和22例胫骨近端假体置换术:共有35/94名患者(37.2%)出现了与垫片相关的并发症,其中26/35例并发症(74.3%)是由于垫片结构的机械故障,而9/35例并发症(25.7%)是由于感染复发。髓内间隔器总长度小于中心骨缺损长度的两倍(p = 0.009)、近端或远端骨内间隔器接触面小于 10%以及胫骨结节截骨术后(p = 0.005)是造成内部失败的风险因素。间隔器并发症的发生率显著增加了第二阶段的时间:无并发症者平均为157天(42至458天),而有并发症者为227天(11至528天)(p = 0.014):结论:静态抗生素骨水泥垫片的失败率远高于预期。结论:静态抗生素加载骨水泥垫片的失败率远高于预期,垫片并发症大大增加了二期翻修的时间。如果间隔器的尺寸小于节段缺损的两倍,或者在残余骨中插入的加固材料不足,机械失效的风险就会大大增加。这些发现为外科医生避免使用静态间隔器时出现机械并发症提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
A focus on the Shoulder and Elbow in 2024. Are the current minimal clinically important differences fit for purpose? Association between surgeon and hospital volume and outcome of first-time revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic loosening. Characterization of articular lesions associated with glenohumeral instability using arthroscopy. Elbow kinematics with increased lengthening of a radial head arthroplasty evaluated with dynamic radiostereometric analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1