Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients During Teleconsultation. Scoping Review.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1055/a-2425-8626
Takashi Sota, Tim Jackson, Eleanor Yang, Annie Ys Lau
{"title":"Communication Challenges Experienced by Clinicians and Patients During Teleconsultation. Scoping Review.","authors":"Takashi Sota, Tim Jackson, Eleanor Yang, Annie Ys Lau","doi":"10.1055/a-2425-8626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background As teleconsultations continue to rise in popularity due to their convenience and accessibility, it's crucial to identify and address the challenges they present in order to improve the patient experience, enhance outcomes, and ensure the quality of care. To identify communication challenges that clinicians and patients experience during teleconsultation, a scoping review was conducted. Methods Studies were obtained from four databases (Ovid [MEDLINE], Ovid [Embase], CINAHL and Scopus). Gray literatures were not included. Studies focused on communication challenges between clinicians and their patients during teleconsultation in the context of COVID-19 and published from January 2000 to December 2022 were collected. Screening process was conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Data extraction was performed using a standardized form to capture study characteristics and communication challenges. Extracted data were analyzed to identify the communication challenges during teleconsultation, adherent to PRISMA-ScR. Results A total of 893 studies were collected from 4 databases and 26 studies were selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of these 26 eligible studies, 12 (46%) were from the US, 3 studies (12%) were from Australia, 2 (8%) were from the UK and Canada. These studies included 12 (46%) qualitative studies, 6 (23%) quantitative studies, 6 (23%) review articles, and 2 (8%) case reports. Eight factors contributing to communication challenges between clinicians and patients during teleconsultations were identified: technical issues, difficulties in developing rapport, lack of non-verbal communication, lack of physical examination, language barrier, spatial issues, clinician preparation, and difficulties in assessing patients' health literacy. Conclusion Eight factors were identified contributing to communication challenges during teleconsultation in the context of COVID-19. These findings highlight the need for addressing communication challenges to ensure effective teleconsultations. With the rise of teleconsultation in routine healthcare delivery, further research is warranted to confirm these findings, and to explore ways to overcome communication challenges during teleconsultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2425-8626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background As teleconsultations continue to rise in popularity due to their convenience and accessibility, it's crucial to identify and address the challenges they present in order to improve the patient experience, enhance outcomes, and ensure the quality of care. To identify communication challenges that clinicians and patients experience during teleconsultation, a scoping review was conducted. Methods Studies were obtained from four databases (Ovid [MEDLINE], Ovid [Embase], CINAHL and Scopus). Gray literatures were not included. Studies focused on communication challenges between clinicians and their patients during teleconsultation in the context of COVID-19 and published from January 2000 to December 2022 were collected. Screening process was conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Data extraction was performed using a standardized form to capture study characteristics and communication challenges. Extracted data were analyzed to identify the communication challenges during teleconsultation, adherent to PRISMA-ScR. Results A total of 893 studies were collected from 4 databases and 26 studies were selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of these 26 eligible studies, 12 (46%) were from the US, 3 studies (12%) were from Australia, 2 (8%) were from the UK and Canada. These studies included 12 (46%) qualitative studies, 6 (23%) quantitative studies, 6 (23%) review articles, and 2 (8%) case reports. Eight factors contributing to communication challenges between clinicians and patients during teleconsultations were identified: technical issues, difficulties in developing rapport, lack of non-verbal communication, lack of physical examination, language barrier, spatial issues, clinician preparation, and difficulties in assessing patients' health literacy. Conclusion Eight factors were identified contributing to communication challenges during teleconsultation in the context of COVID-19. These findings highlight the need for addressing communication challenges to ensure effective teleconsultations. With the rise of teleconsultation in routine healthcare delivery, further research is warranted to confirm these findings, and to explore ways to overcome communication challenges during teleconsultation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生和患者在远程会诊过程中遇到的沟通难题。范围审查。
背景 随着远程会诊因其便捷性和可及性而不断普及,识别并解决其带来的挑战以改善患者体验、提高疗效并确保医疗质量至关重要。为了确定临床医生和患者在远程会诊过程中遇到的沟通挑战,我们进行了一次范围界定综述。方法 从四个数据库(Ovid [MEDLINE]、Ovid [Embase]、CINAHL 和 Scopus)中获取研究结果。灰色文献未包括在内。收集了 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间发表的、以 COVID-19 为背景的、关于远程会诊过程中临床医生与患者之间沟通挑战的研究。筛选过程由两名独立审稿人进行。数据提取采用标准化表格,以捕捉研究特征和沟通挑战。根据 PRISMA-ScR 对提取的数据进行分析,以确定远程会诊过程中的沟通挑战。结果 从 4 个数据库中共收集到 893 项研究,根据纳入/排除标准筛选出 26 项研究。在这 26 项符合条件的研究中,12 项(46%)来自美国,3 项(12%)来自澳大利亚,2 项(8%)来自英国和加拿大。这些研究包括 12 项(46%)定性研究、6 项(23%)定量研究、6 项(23%)综述文章和 2 项(8%)病例报告。研究发现了导致临床医生与患者在远程会诊过程中沟通困难的八个因素:技术问题、难以建立融洽关系、缺乏非语言沟通、缺乏体格检查、语言障碍、空间问题、临床医生的准备工作以及难以评估患者的健康素养。结论 在 COVID-19 的研究中发现了导致远程会诊过程中沟通困难的八个因素。这些发现凸显了解决沟通难题以确保有效远程会诊的必要性。随着远程会诊在常规医疗保健服务中的兴起,有必要开展进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并探索克服远程会诊中沟通挑战的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
期刊最新文献
Special_Issue_Teaching_and_Training_Future_Health_Informaticians: Managing the transition from tradition to innovation of the Heidelberg/Heilbronn Medical Informatics Master's Program. Effects of Aligning Residency Note Templates with CMS Evaluation and Management Documentation Requirements. Multisite implementation of a sexual health survey and clinical decision support to promote adolescent sexually transmitted infection screening. Optimizing Resident Charge Capture with Disappearing Help Text in Note Templates. Special Section on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Informatics: Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rural and Underserved Populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1