Evaluation of the Opinions of Surgery Patients on Perioperative Privacy

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.115
Burçin Irmak PhD , Nurgül Bölükbaş PhD , Muharrem Çelik BSN, RN , Elif Aslan BSN, RN , Hatice Polat Şimşek BSN, RN , Ömer Seyfi Acar BSN, RN , Ümmühan İrice BSN, RN
{"title":"Evaluation of the Opinions of Surgery Patients on Perioperative Privacy","authors":"Burçin Irmak PhD ,&nbsp;Nurgül Bölükbaş PhD ,&nbsp;Muharrem Çelik BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Elif Aslan BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Hatice Polat Şimşek BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Ömer Seyfi Acar BSN, RN ,&nbsp;Ümmühan İrice BSN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate surgical patients' perceptions of perioperative privacy.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A descriptive and cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 172 patients who underwent surgical intervention at a state hospital were included. A Patient Information Form and the Perioperative Privacy Scale (PPS) were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>With a mean age of 56.81 ± 1.29 years, 56.4% of the patients were male. Over half of all patients (51.7%) were familiar with the concept of patient privacy, and the vast majority (94.2%) felt that their privacy was protected by the health care staff during their hospital stay. The mean PPS score was 74.38 ± 10.44. A statistically significant difference was found between the patients' marital status, education level, health insurance, attention to privacy by health personnel, and the mean scores of the PPS (<em>P</em> &lt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The research found that patients who underwent surgery felt that their privacy was well-protected during the perioperative period. To maintain patient privacy during this process, surgical nurses should continue their current practices and emphasize the importance of the subject in in-service training programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":"40 3","pages":"Pages 558-563.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089947224003551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate surgical patients' perceptions of perioperative privacy.

Design

A descriptive and cross-sectional study.

Methods

A total of 172 patients who underwent surgical intervention at a state hospital were included. A Patient Information Form and the Perioperative Privacy Scale (PPS) were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test.

Findings

With a mean age of 56.81 ± 1.29 years, 56.4% of the patients were male. Over half of all patients (51.7%) were familiar with the concept of patient privacy, and the vast majority (94.2%) felt that their privacy was protected by the health care staff during their hospital stay. The mean PPS score was 74.38 ± 10.44. A statistically significant difference was found between the patients' marital status, education level, health insurance, attention to privacy by health personnel, and the mean scores of the PPS (P < .05).

Conclusions

The research found that patients who underwent surgery felt that their privacy was well-protected during the perioperative period. To maintain patient privacy during this process, surgical nurses should continue their current practices and emphasize the importance of the subject in in-service training programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估手术患者对围手术期隐私的看法。
目的:评估手术患者对围术期隐私的看法:方法:描述性横断面研究:共纳入 172 名在一家州立医院接受外科手术的患者。采用患者信息表和围手术期隐私量表(PPS)收集数据。数据分析采用描述性统计方法、Mann-Whitney U 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis H 检验:平均年龄为(56.81 ± 1.29)岁,56.4%的患者为男性。超过一半的患者(51.7%)熟悉患者隐私的概念,绝大多数患者(94.2%)认为在住院期间医护人员保护了他们的隐私。PPS 平均得分为 74.38 ± 10.44。研究发现,患者的婚姻状况、教育程度、医疗保险、医护人员对隐私的关注程度与 PPS 平均得分之间存在明显的统计学差异(P 结论:PPS 的平均得分与患者的婚姻状况、教育程度、医疗保险、医护人员对隐私的关注程度之间存在明显的统计学差异:研究发现,接受手术的患者认为他们的隐私在围手术期得到了很好的保护。为了在这一过程中维护病人的隐私,外科护士应继续保持目前的做法,并在在职培训课程中强调这一主题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Moving to the Future. The Effect of Early Mobilization on Postoperative Recovery in Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Corrigendum to "Investigation of Postoperative Risks of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Breast Cancer" [Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 38 (2023) 264-268]. The Effects of Surgical Fear Levels on Postpartum Pain and Breastfeeding in Elective Cesarean Section Cases: A Cross-sectional Study. The Effects of Preoperative Oral Dextrose Loading on Mobility Independence and Perioperative Comfort in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1