Risk factors and distribution pattern of lateral lymph node recurrence after central neck dissection for cN1a papillary thyroid carcinoma.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02564-3
Binbin Long, Mingxu Luo, Ke Zhou, Tao Zheng, Wenfang Li
{"title":"Risk factors and distribution pattern of lateral lymph node recurrence after central neck dissection for cN1a papillary thyroid carcinoma.","authors":"Binbin Long, Mingxu Luo, Ke Zhou, Tao Zheng, Wenfang Li","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02564-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The indication and extent of selective lateral neck dissection (LND) for cN1a papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remain uncertain. The present study aimed to identify potential predictors and distribution pattern of lateral lymph node recurrence (LLNR) after central neck dissection in cN1a PTC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cN1a PTC patients who underwent initial central neck dissection at our centre were retrospectively reviewed, and the median follow-up period was 6.8 years. Reoperation with LND was performed when LLNR was confirmed. Risk factors for LLNR were identified, and the metastatic status of each lateral level was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 310 patients enrolled in the present study, fifty-eight patients (18.7%) presented with LLNR. Six independent factors, including tumour diameter, pathological T4 stage, number of involved central lymph nodes, pTNM stage, extrathyroidal extension, and I<sup>131</sup> treatment (P values < 0.05) were identified via multivariate analysis. LLNR was found at level II in 26 patients (44.8%), level III in 38 patients (65.5%), level IV in 30 patients (51.7%), and level V in 8 patients (13.8%). The number of positive lateral lymph nodes at levels II, III, IV and V was 44 (22.9%), 76 (39.6%), 63 (32.8%), and 9 (4.9%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For cN1a PTC patients who underwent central neck dissection, tumour diameter ≥ 2 cm, pathological T4 stage, number of involved central lymph nodes ≥ 3, pTNM stage III-IV, extrathyroidal extension, and failure to receive I<sup>131</sup> treatment were independent predictors of LLNR, which was more likely to occur at levels III and IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02564-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The indication and extent of selective lateral neck dissection (LND) for cN1a papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) remain uncertain. The present study aimed to identify potential predictors and distribution pattern of lateral lymph node recurrence (LLNR) after central neck dissection in cN1a PTC patients.

Methods: The cN1a PTC patients who underwent initial central neck dissection at our centre were retrospectively reviewed, and the median follow-up period was 6.8 years. Reoperation with LND was performed when LLNR was confirmed. Risk factors for LLNR were identified, and the metastatic status of each lateral level was recorded.

Results: Of the 310 patients enrolled in the present study, fifty-eight patients (18.7%) presented with LLNR. Six independent factors, including tumour diameter, pathological T4 stage, number of involved central lymph nodes, pTNM stage, extrathyroidal extension, and I131 treatment (P values < 0.05) were identified via multivariate analysis. LLNR was found at level II in 26 patients (44.8%), level III in 38 patients (65.5%), level IV in 30 patients (51.7%), and level V in 8 patients (13.8%). The number of positive lateral lymph nodes at levels II, III, IV and V was 44 (22.9%), 76 (39.6%), 63 (32.8%), and 9 (4.9%), respectively.

Conclusions: For cN1a PTC patients who underwent central neck dissection, tumour diameter ≥ 2 cm, pathological T4 stage, number of involved central lymph nodes ≥ 3, pTNM stage III-IV, extrathyroidal extension, and failure to receive I131 treatment were independent predictors of LLNR, which was more likely to occur at levels III and IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
cN1a 甲状腺乳头状癌颈部中央切除术后侧淋巴结复发的风险因素和分布模式
背景:cN1a甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)选择性颈侧淋巴结清扫术(LND)的适应症和范围仍不确定。本研究旨在确定 cN1a PTC 患者颈部中央切除术后侧淋巴结复发(LLNR)的潜在预测因素和分布模式:回顾性研究了在本中心接受初次颈部中央切除术的cN1a PTC患者,中位随访时间为6.8年。当确认LLNR时,再进行LND手术。确定了LLNR的风险因素,并记录了每个侧位的转移状态:在本研究登记的 310 名患者中,有 58 名患者(18.7%)出现 LLNR。肿瘤直径、病理T4分期、受累中央淋巴结数量、pTNM分期、甲状腺外扩展和I131治疗等六个独立因素(P值 结论:对于cN1a PTC患者,LLNR的发生率较高:对于接受颈部中央切除术的 cN1a PTC 患者,肿瘤直径≥ 2 厘米、病理 T4 分期、受累中央淋巴结数量≥ 3 个、pTNM 分期 III-IV、甲状腺外扩展和未接受 I131 治疗是 LLNR 的独立预测因素,而 LLNR 更有可能发生在 III 和 IV 期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Real-world study on the application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodule resection. The seven-day cumulative post-esophagectomy inflammatory response predicts cancer recurrence. Seprafilm® and adhesive small bowel obstruction in colorectal/abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review. The safety and efficacy of stapler method for transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatoduodenectomy (STRAP-PD trial): study protocol for a randomized control trial. Challenges and opportunities for Mohs surgery implementation in African healthcare systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1