Is Artificial Intelligence ageist?

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY European Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s41999-024-01070-2
Yanira Aranda Rubio, Juan José Baztán Cortés, Fernando Canillas Del Rey
{"title":"Is Artificial Intelligence ageist?","authors":"Yanira Aranda Rubio, Juan José Baztán Cortés, Fernando Canillas Del Rey","doi":"10.1007/s41999-024-01070-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a technological innovation with wide applicability in daily life, which could help elderly people. However, it raises potential conflicts, such as biases, omissions and errors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Descriptive study through the negative stereotypes towards aging questionnaire (CENVE) conducted on chatbots ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, YOUChat, and Copilot was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the chatbots studied, three were above 50% in responses with negative stereotypes, Copilot with high ageism level results, followed by Perplexity. In the health section, Copilot was the chatbot with the most negative connotations regarding old age (13 out of 20 points). In the personality section, Copilot scored 14 out of 20, followed by YOUChat.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Copilot chatbot responded to the statements more ageistically than the other platforms. These results highlight the importance of addressing any potential biases in AI to ensure that the responses provided are fair and respectful for all potential users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1957-1960"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01070-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a technological innovation with wide applicability in daily life, which could help elderly people. However, it raises potential conflicts, such as biases, omissions and errors.

Methods: Descriptive study through the negative stereotypes towards aging questionnaire (CENVE) conducted on chatbots ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, YOUChat, and Copilot was conducted.

Results: Of the chatbots studied, three were above 50% in responses with negative stereotypes, Copilot with high ageism level results, followed by Perplexity. In the health section, Copilot was the chatbot with the most negative connotations regarding old age (13 out of 20 points). In the personality section, Copilot scored 14 out of 20, followed by YOUChat.

Conclusion: The Copilot chatbot responded to the statements more ageistically than the other platforms. These results highlight the importance of addressing any potential biases in AI to ensure that the responses provided are fair and respectful for all potential users.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能有年龄歧视吗?
引言生成式人工智能(AI)是一项技术创新,在日常生活中具有广泛的适用性,可以帮助老年人。然而,它也会带来潜在的冲突,如偏见、遗漏和错误:方法:通过对聊天机器人 ChatGPT、Gemini、Perplexity、YOUChat 和 Copilot 的消极老龄化刻板印象问卷(CENVE)进行描述性研究:结果:在所研究的聊天机器人中,有三个的负面刻板印象回答率超过 50%,其中 Copilot 的老龄化程度较高,其次是 Perplexity。在 "健康 "部分,Copilot 是对老年负面印象最深的聊天机器人(20 分中有 13 分)。在个性部分,Copilot 得到了 14 分(满分 20 分),其次是 YOUChat:结论:与其他平台相比,Copilot 聊天机器人在回答问题时更注重年龄。这些结果凸显了解决人工智能中任何潜在偏见的重要性,以确保为所有潜在用户提供公平和尊重的回复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
期刊最新文献
Teaching Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in medical education: a scoping review. Predictors of mood disturbance in older adults: a longitudinal cohort study. Approaches to characterising multimorbidity in older people accessing hospital care: a scoping review. Analysis of long-term prognosis of older patients after a first fall according to economic status. Challenges, current innovations, and opportunities for managing type 2 diabetes in frail older adults: a position paper of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS)-Special Interest Group in Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1