In people with shoulder pain, mobilisation with movement and exercise improves function and pain more than sham mobilisation with movement and exercise: a randomised trial
Rafael Baeske , Toby Hall , Rafael Rodrigues Dall’Olmo , Marcelo Faria Silva
{"title":"In people with shoulder pain, mobilisation with movement and exercise improves function and pain more than sham mobilisation with movement and exercise: a randomised trial","authors":"Rafael Baeske , Toby Hall , Rafael Rodrigues Dall’Olmo , Marcelo Faria Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.jphys.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Question</h3><div>In people with shoulder pain, what is the effect of adding mobilisation with movement (MWM) to a standard exercise program on function and pain compared with sham MWM and the same exercise program?</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A randomised trial with concealed allocation, blinded outcome assessment and intention-to-treat analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Seventy people with chronic atraumatic rotator cuff related pain, with a mean age 48 years (SD 10).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>The experimental group received MWM plus exercise and the control group received sham MWM plus exercise. Treatments were delivered twice per week for 5 weeks.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcome measures were function (0 to 100 Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) and pain (0 to 10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes were self-efficacy, perceived improvement and active pain-free range of movement. Assessment time points were at baseline (week 0), the end of the treatment period (week 5) and a follow-up 1 month after the end of treatment (week 9).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At week 5, the experimental group improved more than the control group in function (MD –15 points, 95% CI –24 to –7), pain at night (MD –2.1, 95% CI –3.1 to –1.1), pain on movement (MD –1.5, 95% CI –2.5 to –0.6) and active range of movement in flexion (MD 16 deg, 95% CI 1 to 30), abduction (MD 23 deg, 95% CI 6 to 40), external rotation (MD 11 deg, 95% CI 4 to 17) and hand behind back (MD 20 deg, 95% CI 8 to 32). At week 9, benefits were seen in the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (MD –9 points, 95% CI –17 to –1), pain at night (MD –1.9, 95% CI –2.9 to –0.8) and on movement (MD –1.3, 95% CI–2.3 to –0.3). The effects of the experimental intervention on other outcomes were mostly unclear due to wide confidence intervals. Blinding was successful.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Adding MWM to exercise improved function, pain and active range of movement in people with shoulder pain. These benefits were not placebo effects.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>NCT04175184.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"70 4","pages":"Pages 288-293"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1836955324000857","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Question
In people with shoulder pain, what is the effect of adding mobilisation with movement (MWM) to a standard exercise program on function and pain compared with sham MWM and the same exercise program?
Design
A randomised trial with concealed allocation, blinded outcome assessment and intention-to-treat analysis.
Participants
Seventy people with chronic atraumatic rotator cuff related pain, with a mean age 48 years (SD 10).
Interventions
The experimental group received MWM plus exercise and the control group received sham MWM plus exercise. Treatments were delivered twice per week for 5 weeks.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome measures were function (0 to 100 Shoulder Pain and Disability Index) and pain (0 to 10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale). Secondary outcomes were self-efficacy, perceived improvement and active pain-free range of movement. Assessment time points were at baseline (week 0), the end of the treatment period (week 5) and a follow-up 1 month after the end of treatment (week 9).
Results
At week 5, the experimental group improved more than the control group in function (MD –15 points, 95% CI –24 to –7), pain at night (MD –2.1, 95% CI –3.1 to –1.1), pain on movement (MD –1.5, 95% CI –2.5 to –0.6) and active range of movement in flexion (MD 16 deg, 95% CI 1 to 30), abduction (MD 23 deg, 95% CI 6 to 40), external rotation (MD 11 deg, 95% CI 4 to 17) and hand behind back (MD 20 deg, 95% CI 8 to 32). At week 9, benefits were seen in the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (MD –9 points, 95% CI –17 to –1), pain at night (MD –1.9, 95% CI –2.9 to –0.8) and on movement (MD –1.3, 95% CI–2.3 to –0.3). The effects of the experimental intervention on other outcomes were mostly unclear due to wide confidence intervals. Blinding was successful.
Conclusions
Adding MWM to exercise improved function, pain and active range of movement in people with shoulder pain. These benefits were not placebo effects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiotherapy is the official journal of the Australian Physiotherapy Association. It aims to publish high-quality research with a significant impact on global physiotherapy practice. The journal's vision is to lead the field in supporting clinicians to access, understand, and implement research evidence that will enhance person-centred care. In January 2008, the Journal of Physiotherapy became the first physiotherapy journal to adhere to the ICMJE requirement of registering randomized trials with a recognized Trial Registry. The journal prioritizes systematic reviews, clinical trials, economic analyses, experimental studies, qualitative studies, epidemiological studies, and observational studies. In January 2014, it also became the first core physiotherapy/physical therapy journal to provide free access to editorials and peer-reviewed original research. The Australian Physiotherapy Association extended their support for excellence in physiotherapy practice by sponsoring open access publication of all Journal of Physiotherapy content in 2016. As a result, all past, present, and future journal articles are freely accessible, and there are no author fees for publication.