Satisfaction in surgically treated patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: an observational study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.

Abstract

Background context: Healthcare reimbursement is evolving towards a value-based model, entwined and emphasizing patient satisfaction. Factors associated with satisfaction after degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgery have not been previously established.

Purpose: Our primary objective was to ascertain satisfaction rates and satisfaction predictors at 3 and 12 months following surgical treatment for DCM.

Design: This is a prospective cohort study within Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).

Patient sample: Patients in the study were surgically treated for DCM patients who completed 3-month and 12-month follow-ups within CSORN between 2015 and 2021.

Outcome measures: Data analyzed included patient demographic, surgical variables, patient-reported outcomes (NDI, NRS-NP, NRS-AP, SF-12-MCS, SF-12-PCS, ED-5Q, PHQ-8), MJOA and self-reported satisfaction on a Likert scale.

Methods: Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify significant factors associated with satisfaction, address multicollinearity and ensure predictive accuracy. This process was conducted separately for the 3-month and 12-month follow-ups.

Results: Six hundred and sixty-three patients were included, with an average age of 60, and an even distribution across MJOA scores (mild, moderate, severe). At 3-month and 12-month follow-up, satisfaction rates were 86% and 82%, respectively. At 12 months, logistic regression showed the odds of being satisfied varied by +24%, -3%, -10%, -14%, +3%, and +12% for each 1-point change between baseline and 12 months in MJOA, NDI, NRS-NP, NRS-AP, SF-12-MCS, SF-12-PCS. Satisfaction increased 11-fold for each 0.1-point increased in ED-5Q from baseline to 12 months. At baseline, for every 1-point increase in SF-12-MCS, the odds of being satisfied increased by 7%. At 3 months, all PROs (except for NRS-AP change and baseline SF-12-MCS) predicted satisfaction. All logistic regression analyses demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, with the highest 12-month AUC of 0.86 (95%CI=0.81-0.90). No patient demographic or surgical factors influenced satisfaction.

Conclusions: Improvement in Patient Reported Outcomes and MJOA are strongly associated with patient satisfaction after surgery for DCM. The only baseline PRO associated with 12-months satisfaction was SF-12-MCS. No modifiable patient baseline characteristic or surgical variables were associated with satisfaction.