Spine injuries among severely injured trauma patients: A retrospective single-center cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1177/14574969241271781
Henri Lassila, Mikko Heinänen, Joni Serlo, Tuomas Brinck
{"title":"Spine injuries among severely injured trauma patients: A retrospective single-center cohort study.","authors":"Henri Lassila, Mikko Heinänen, Joni Serlo, Tuomas Brinck","doi":"10.1177/14574969241271781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds and aims: </strong>We aimed to determine the incidence and severity of spine injuries among severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS)/New Injury Severity Score (NISS) > 15) treated in a single tertiary trauma center over 15 years. We also wanted to compare the demographics between patients with and without spine injuries and to determine the mortality of spine-injury patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the years 2006-2020 from the Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR), a local trauma registry of the trauma unit of the Helsinki University Hospital (HUH), were reviewed. We divided patients into two groups, namely those with traumatic spine injury (TSI) and those without traumatic spine injury (N-TSI). TSI patients were further subdivided into groups according to the level of injury (cervical, thoracolumbar, or multilevel) and the presence of neurological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2529 patients: 1336 (53%) had a TSI and 1193 (47%) had N-TSI. TSI patients were injured more frequently by a high-fall mechanism (37% vs 21%, p < 0.001). Among TSI patients, 38% of high-fall injuries were self-inflicted. High falls, young age, and female gender were overrepresented in spine-injury patients with a self-inflicted injury mechanism. Cervical spine-injury patients were mostly elderly persons injured by a low-energy mechanism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unlike other severely injured trauma patients, severely injured trauma patients with spine injuries are more frequently injured by a high-fall mechanism and self-injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"293-302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241271781","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds and aims: We aimed to determine the incidence and severity of spine injuries among severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score (ISS)/New Injury Severity Score (NISS) > 15) treated in a single tertiary trauma center over 15 years. We also wanted to compare the demographics between patients with and without spine injuries and to determine the mortality of spine-injury patients.

Methods: Data from the years 2006-2020 from the Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR), a local trauma registry of the trauma unit of the Helsinki University Hospital (HUH), were reviewed. We divided patients into two groups, namely those with traumatic spine injury (TSI) and those without traumatic spine injury (N-TSI). TSI patients were further subdivided into groups according to the level of injury (cervical, thoracolumbar, or multilevel) and the presence of neurological symptoms.

Results: We included 2529 patients: 1336 (53%) had a TSI and 1193 (47%) had N-TSI. TSI patients were injured more frequently by a high-fall mechanism (37% vs 21%, p < 0.001). Among TSI patients, 38% of high-fall injuries were self-inflicted. High falls, young age, and female gender were overrepresented in spine-injury patients with a self-inflicted injury mechanism. Cervical spine-injury patients were mostly elderly persons injured by a low-energy mechanism.

Conclusions: Unlike other severely injured trauma patients, severely injured trauma patients with spine injuries are more frequently injured by a high-fall mechanism and self-injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重创伤患者的脊柱损伤:一项回顾性单中心队列研究。
背景和目的:我们的目的是确定 15 年来在一家三级创伤中心接受治疗的严重创伤患者(损伤严重程度评分 (ISS)/ 新伤严重程度评分 (NISS) > 15)中脊柱损伤的发生率和严重程度。我们还希望比较脊柱损伤和非脊柱损伤患者的人口统计学特征,并确定脊柱损伤患者的死亡率:我们回顾了赫尔辛基创伤登记处(Helsinki Trauma Registry,HTR)2006-2020年的数据,该登记处是赫尔辛基大学医院(HUH)创伤科的地方创伤登记处。我们将患者分为两组,即有创伤性脊柱损伤(TSI)和无创伤性脊柱损伤(N-TSI)的患者。外伤性脊柱损伤患者又根据损伤程度(颈椎、胸腰椎或多级)和是否出现神经系统症状细分为不同的组别:我们共纳入了 2529 名患者:1336人(53%)为TSI患者,1193人(47%)为N-TSI患者。TSI患者更多地受到高处坠落机制的伤害(37% vs 21%,P 结论:TSI患者的神经系统症状与N-TSI患者相同:与其他严重受伤的创伤患者不同,脊柱严重受伤的创伤患者更常因高处坠落机制和自伤而受伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
期刊最新文献
A randomized double-blind noninferiority clinical multicenter trial on oral moxifloxacin versus placebo in the outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: APPAC IV study protocol. Modern surgical treatments for lymphedema. Impact of oral administration of calcitriol to prevent symptomatic hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. 16-year outcomes of blunt thoracic aortic injury treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A single-institution experience. Reducing the risk of cancer with bariatric surgery: The need for evidence to guide practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1