The impact of blood type and body size on successful bridging to heart transplantation using intra-aortic balloon pump or surgically implanted microaxial left ventricular assist device.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.028
Taylor Nordan, Mohamed Keshk, Amy Hackmann, Michael M Givertz, Mandeep R Mehra, Mark J Cunningham, Akinobu Itoh
{"title":"The impact of blood type and body size on successful bridging to heart transplantation using intra-aortic balloon pump or surgically implanted microaxial left ventricular assist device.","authors":"Taylor Nordan, Mohamed Keshk, Amy Hackmann, Michael M Givertz, Mandeep R Mehra, Mark J Cunningham, Akinobu Itoh","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Waitlist time for United Network for Organ Sharing Status 2 heart transplant candidates has steadily increased. We compared a bridging strategy using either the Impella 5.0/5.5 (\"Impella\") or intra-aortic balloon pump with a durable left ventricular assist device in patients with blood type O stratified by body habitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried for adults listed for de novo heart transplantation (without dialysis) supported by the Impella, an intra-aortic balloon pump, or the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device. The primary outcome was 1-year postlisting survival, defined as the sum of waitlist time and post-heart transplant survival time if the candidate underwent heart transplantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2942 candidates were included (Impella: 214; intra-aortic balloon pump: 1326; HeartMate 3: 1402). Listing with the Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump was associated with worse postlisting survival compared with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in type O candidates (Impella: hazard ratio, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.48-5.67], P = .002; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.59-3.68], P < .001) but less so in non-type O candidates. Further analysis of type O candidates demonstrated that the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump were associated with a lower risk of postlisting mortality among those with normal height (25-75th percentile) and nonobese (body mass index <30) (Impella: hazard ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.61-5.18], P = .292; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.67-2.45], P = .455); among those not of normal height and nonobese, the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump were associated with an elevated risk of postlisting mortality (Impella: hazard ratio, 3.65 [95% CI, 1.68-7.95], P = .001; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 3.01 [95% CI, 1.95-4.67], P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood type O candidates listed with the Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump are at increased risk of postlisting mortality compared with a durable left ventricular assist device in the current organ allocation era. These effects are diminished among those with normal height and body habitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.09.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Waitlist time for United Network for Organ Sharing Status 2 heart transplant candidates has steadily increased. We compared a bridging strategy using either the Impella 5.0/5.5 ("Impella") or intra-aortic balloon pump with a durable left ventricular assist device in patients with blood type O stratified by body habitus.

Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried for adults listed for de novo heart transplantation (without dialysis) supported by the Impella, an intra-aortic balloon pump, or the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device. The primary outcome was 1-year postlisting survival, defined as the sum of waitlist time and post-heart transplant survival time if the candidate underwent heart transplantation.

Results: In total, 2942 candidates were included (Impella: 214; intra-aortic balloon pump: 1326; HeartMate 3: 1402). Listing with the Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump was associated with worse postlisting survival compared with the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device in type O candidates (Impella: hazard ratio, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.48-5.67], P = .002; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.59-3.68], P < .001) but less so in non-type O candidates. Further analysis of type O candidates demonstrated that the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump were associated with a lower risk of postlisting mortality among those with normal height (25-75th percentile) and nonobese (body mass index <30) (Impella: hazard ratio, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.61-5.18], P = .292; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.67-2.45], P = .455); among those not of normal height and nonobese, the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump were associated with an elevated risk of postlisting mortality (Impella: hazard ratio, 3.65 [95% CI, 1.68-7.95], P = .001; intra-aortic balloon pump: hazard ratio, 3.01 [95% CI, 1.95-4.67], P < .001).

Conclusions: Blood type O candidates listed with the Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump are at increased risk of postlisting mortality compared with a durable left ventricular assist device in the current organ allocation era. These effects are diminished among those with normal height and body habitus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血型和体型对使用主动脉内球囊反搏泵或手术植入微轴左心室辅助装置成功完成心脏移植的影响
目的:UNOS 状态 2 心脏移植(HTx)候选者的候诊时间稳步增加。我们比较了在 O 型血患者中使用 Impella 5.0/5.5 ("Impella")或主动脉内气囊泵 (IABP) 与耐用 LVAD 的桥接策略,并根据体型进行了分层:方法: 在 UNOS 注册表中查询了由 Impella、IABP 或 HM3 LVAD 支持的去原发性 HTx(无透析)的成人。主要结果是列入名单后一年的存活率,定义为候选名单时间和接受 HTx 后存活时间(如果候选者接受了 HTx)之和:共纳入 2,942 名候选人(Impella:214 人;IABP:1326 人;HM3:1402 人)。与 HM3 LVAD 相比,Impella 或 IABP 与 O 型血患者上市后存活率较低有关(Impella:HR 2.90 [95% CI 1.48-5.67],P=0.002;IABP:HR 2.42 [95% CI 1.59-3.68],P=0.002):在当前器官分配时代,与耐用型 LVAD 相比,使用 Impella 或 IABP 的 O 型血候选者上市后的死亡风险更高。身高和体型正常的患者受到的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
期刊最新文献
Lung Transplantation After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in High-Risk Recipients: A Propensity Matched Analysis of a National Database. Donor and Recipient Factors Associated with Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation: A DMG Registry Analysis. Also, long live the joint general surgery/thoracic surgery (4+3) pathway! Commentator Discussion: Cardiac Surgical Unit-Advanced Life Support-certified centers are associated with improved failure to rescue after cardiac arrest: A propensity score-matched analysis. Commentator Discussion: Personalizing patient risk of a life-altering event: An application of machine learning to hemiarch surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1