Trends in payments for facility and surgeon professional fees for shoulder surgeries performed at ambulatory surgery centers.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.003
William Harkin, Vincent P Federico, Tyler Williams, Alexander J Acuna, Johnathon R McCormick, John P Scanaliato, Gregory P Nicholson, Nikhil N Verma, Grant E Garrigues
{"title":"Trends in payments for facility and surgeon professional fees for shoulder surgeries performed at ambulatory surgery centers.","authors":"William Harkin, Vincent P Federico, Tyler Williams, Alexander J Acuna, Johnathon R McCormick, John P Scanaliato, Gregory P Nicholson, Nikhil N Verma, Grant E Garrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It has previously been demonstrated that utilization of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) results in cost savings and improved outcomes. Despite these benefits, Medicare reimbursement for professional fees at ASCs are decreasing over time. In this study, we sought to analyze the discrepancy between facility fee and professional fee reimbursements for ASCs by Medicare for common shoulder procedures over time. We hypothesized that professional fees for shoulder procedures would decrease over the study period while facility fees kept pace with inflation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify shoulder specific procedures approved for ASCs by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Procedures were grouped into arthroscopic and open categories. Publicly available data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was accessed via the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Lookup Tool and used to determine professional fee payments from 2018 to 2024. Additionally, Medicare ASC Payment Rates files were accessed to determine facility fee reimbursements to ASCs from 2018 to 2024. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means and percent change over time. Compound annual growth rates were calculated and discrepancies in inflation were corrected for using the Consumer Price Index. The Benjamini and Hochberg method was used to correct P values in the setting of multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 common shoulder procedures were included for analysis (10 arthroscopic codes and 23 open codes). Reimbursements for facility fees have remained significantly higher than corresponding professional fees for both open and arthroscopic procedures (P < .01). On average, facility fee reimbursements for common shoulder surgeries have risen on an annual basis in a manner consistent with inflation (P = .838). However, professional fees for these procedures have experienced a nearly uniform decline over the study period both nominally and in inflation-adjusted dollars (P = .064 and P = .005, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Facility fee payments for outpatient approved shoulder surgeries have matched or outpaced inflation. Over the same time period, professional fee reimbursements for surgeons are consistently decreasing, both in absolute and inflation-adjusted dollars. Reform to the physician fee schedule is necessary to ensure that Medicare patients retain access to high-quality physician care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It has previously been demonstrated that utilization of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) results in cost savings and improved outcomes. Despite these benefits, Medicare reimbursement for professional fees at ASCs are decreasing over time. In this study, we sought to analyze the discrepancy between facility fee and professional fee reimbursements for ASCs by Medicare for common shoulder procedures over time. We hypothesized that professional fees for shoulder procedures would decrease over the study period while facility fees kept pace with inflation.

Methods: Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify shoulder specific procedures approved for ASCs by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Procedures were grouped into arthroscopic and open categories. Publicly available data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was accessed via the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Lookup Tool and used to determine professional fee payments from 2018 to 2024. Additionally, Medicare ASC Payment Rates files were accessed to determine facility fee reimbursements to ASCs from 2018 to 2024. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means and percent change over time. Compound annual growth rates were calculated and discrepancies in inflation were corrected for using the Consumer Price Index. The Benjamini and Hochberg method was used to correct P values in the setting of multiple comparisons.

Results: A total of 33 common shoulder procedures were included for analysis (10 arthroscopic codes and 23 open codes). Reimbursements for facility fees have remained significantly higher than corresponding professional fees for both open and arthroscopic procedures (P < .01). On average, facility fee reimbursements for common shoulder surgeries have risen on an annual basis in a manner consistent with inflation (P = .838). However, professional fees for these procedures have experienced a nearly uniform decline over the study period both nominally and in inflation-adjusted dollars (P = .064 and P = .005, respectively).

Conclusion: Facility fee payments for outpatient approved shoulder surgeries have matched or outpaced inflation. Over the same time period, professional fee reimbursements for surgeons are consistently decreasing, both in absolute and inflation-adjusted dollars. Reform to the physician fee schedule is necessary to ensure that Medicare patients retain access to high-quality physician care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非住院手术中心进行肩部手术的机构和外科医生专业费用的支付趋势。
背景:以前的研究表明,使用非住院手术中心(ASC)可以节约成本并改善治疗效果。尽管有这些好处,但随着时间的推移,医疗保险(Medicare)对门诊手术中心专业人员费用的报销却在减少。在这项研究中,我们试图分析随着时间的推移,医疗保险对非住院手术中心常见肩部手术的设施费和专业费报销之间的差异。我们的假设是,在研究期间,肩部手术的专业费用将下降,而设施费用将与通货膨胀保持同步:方法:使用现行医疗程序术语(CPT)代码确定医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)批准的肩部ASC特定手术。手术分为关节镜手术和开放手术两类。通过 "医疗保险医师费用表查询工具 "访问了 CMS 的公开数据,并利用这些数据确定了 2018-2024 年的专业费用支付情况。此外,还访问了医疗保险 ASC 支付率文件,以确定 2018-2024 年 ASC 的设施费报销情况。描述性统计用于计算均值和随时间变化的百分比。计算了复合年增长率 (CAGR),并使用消费者物价指数校正了通货膨胀的差异。在多重比较的情况下,采用本杰明尼和霍赫伯格法校正 P 值:共有 33 种常见肩部手术纳入分析范围(10 种关节镜手术代码和 23 种开放式手术代码)。无论是开放手术还是关节镜手术,设备费的报销额度一直明显高于相应的专业费用(P结论:经批准的肩关节门诊手术的设施费支付与通胀率持平或高于通胀率。在同一时期,外科医生的专业费用补偿却在持续下降,无论是绝对值还是按通胀调整后的金额。有必要对医生收费标准进行改革,以确保医疗保险患者能够继续获得高质量的医生护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
After primary shoulder arthroplasty appropriate vancomycin antibiotic prophylaxis does not lead to increased infectious complications when compared to cefazolin. Lateralization of the humerus in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: can preoperative planning software predict postoperative lateralization and does lateralization influence outcomes? Pathological formation of subcoracoid bursa effusion on magnetic resonance imaging studies. Pain Relief Survivorship: A Comparison of Exactech Equinoxe Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis. Tyrolean Iceman's arrow injury to the shoulder: New insights into extent and survival time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1