How has acute syndesmotic injury management evolved over the last decade? Results from a national survey.

Abstract

The management of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries has evolved over time and therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the use of different methods and the changes regarding management of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injury among Dutch trauma- and orthopedic surgeons. A digital survey based on a previous survey conducted in 2012 was sent to (orthopedic) trauma surgeons from all different hospitals in the Netherlands. Sixty out of the 68 invited hospitals completed at least one survey (88.2 %). For Weber B or low Weber C fractures, there was a preference for the use of a single syndesmotic screw (SS)(73.6 %), while two screws were mainly used in Maisonneuve fractures (89.3 %). Furthermore, there was a clear preference for 3.5-mm screws, engaging three cortices, 2 to 4-cm above the tibiotalar joint. There is a significant decrease in routine removal of SSs (23.2 % compared to 87.0 % in 2012, p < 0.01). The percentage of hospitals in this survey that used the suture button (SB) was relatively low: 8.3 % for low fibular fractures and 5.0 % in high fibular fractures. In conclusion, the most striking difference compared to 2012 is the large decline in routine removal of the SS, which is in line with current literature. The SS is mainly implanted engaging three cortices, placed 2-4 cm above the tibiotalar joint and 3.5 mm in size and for the treatment of Maisonneuve fractures, two screws are preferred over a single SS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.