Pharmacokinetic comparison of subcutaneously administered CT-P13 (biosimilar of infliximab) via autoinjector and pre-filled syringe in healthy participants

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cts-Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1111/cts.70037
Ye Chan Park, Jae Hoon Kim, Sung Hyun Kim, Ju Hyun Lee, Jang Hee Hong, Jin-Gyu Jung, Jung Sunwoo
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic comparison of subcutaneously administered CT-P13 (biosimilar of infliximab) via autoinjector and pre-filled syringe in healthy participants","authors":"Ye Chan Park,&nbsp;Jae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Sung Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Ju Hyun Lee,&nbsp;Jang Hee Hong,&nbsp;Jin-Gyu Jung,&nbsp;Jung Sunwoo","doi":"10.1111/cts.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>CT-P13, a biosimilar of infliximab, is used to treat inflammatory diseases that arise from immune system complications, resulting in excessive and persistent inflammation. The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of CT-P13 overcomes the drawback of prolonged administration associated with the intravenous (IV) infliximab biosimilar, necessitating autoinjector (AI) administration. This randomized, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, single-dose clinical pharmacology study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of CT-P13 SC administration via AI compared with the existing pre-filled syringe (PFS) method. A total of 147 healthy participants were randomized into two groups, of which 139 completed the study. Blood samples were collected from before CT-P13 SC administration to 2016 h after the start of the administration. Serum concentrations were analyzed using the Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence method. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of the AUC<sub>inf</sub> (areas under the concentration–time curve from zero to infinity) and <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> (The maximum serum concentration) for CT-P13 SC AI versus CT-P13 SC PFS groups, were 94.15% (85.02%–104.26%), 92.48% (84.66%–101.01%), respectively. CT-P13 SC AI and CT-P13 SC PFS achieved comparable PK because the 90% CI was within the predefined equivalence margin. At the end of the study, immunogenicity results revealed that 70 (97.22%) and 73 (98.65%) participants tested positive for anti-drug antibody (ADA) in the CT-P13 SC AI and CT-P13 SC PFS groups, respectively. They were tested positive for neutralizing antibodies. No other significant safety differences were observed between the treatment groups. In conclusion, both administrations demonstrated PK equivalence and were both safe and well-tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11443321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CT-P13, a biosimilar of infliximab, is used to treat inflammatory diseases that arise from immune system complications, resulting in excessive and persistent inflammation. The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of CT-P13 overcomes the drawback of prolonged administration associated with the intravenous (IV) infliximab biosimilar, necessitating autoinjector (AI) administration. This randomized, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, single-dose clinical pharmacology study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of CT-P13 SC administration via AI compared with the existing pre-filled syringe (PFS) method. A total of 147 healthy participants were randomized into two groups, of which 139 completed the study. Blood samples were collected from before CT-P13 SC administration to 2016 h after the start of the administration. Serum concentrations were analyzed using the Meso Scale Discovery electrochemiluminescence method. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of the AUCinf (areas under the concentration–time curve from zero to infinity) and Cmax (The maximum serum concentration) for CT-P13 SC AI versus CT-P13 SC PFS groups, were 94.15% (85.02%–104.26%), 92.48% (84.66%–101.01%), respectively. CT-P13 SC AI and CT-P13 SC PFS achieved comparable PK because the 90% CI was within the predefined equivalence margin. At the end of the study, immunogenicity results revealed that 70 (97.22%) and 73 (98.65%) participants tested positive for anti-drug antibody (ADA) in the CT-P13 SC AI and CT-P13 SC PFS groups, respectively. They were tested positive for neutralizing antibodies. No other significant safety differences were observed between the treatment groups. In conclusion, both administrations demonstrated PK equivalence and were both safe and well-tolerated.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康参与者通过自动注射器和预灌封注射器皮下注射 CT-P13(英夫利昔单抗的生物类似药)的药代动力学比较。
CT-P13是英夫利昔单抗的生物类似药,用于治疗因免疫系统并发症而导致的炎症性疾病,这些并发症会导致过度和持续的炎症。CT-P13的皮下注射制剂克服了静脉注射英夫利昔单抗生物类似药必须使用自动注射器的缺点。这项随机、开放标签、双臂、平行组、单剂量临床药理研究旨在评估CT-P13通过自动注射器(AI)给药与现有预灌封注射器(PFS)给药方法相比的药代动力学(PK)和安全性。共有 147 名健康参与者被随机分为两组,其中 139 人完成了研究。从 CT-P13 SC 给药前到给药开始后的 2016 小时采集血样。使用 Meso Scale Discovery 电化学发光法分析血清浓度。CT-P13 SC AI组与CT-P13 SC PFS组的AUCinf(从零到无穷大的浓度-时间曲线下的面积)和Cmax(最大血清浓度)的几何平均比(90%置信区间)分别为94.15%(85.02%-104.26%)和92.48%(84.66%-101.01%)。CT-P13 SC AI 和 CT-P13 SC PFS 的 PK 值相当,因为 90% CI 在预定的等效范围内。研究结束时,免疫原性结果显示,CT-P13 SC AI 组和 CT-P13 SC PFS 组分别有 70 人(97.22%)和 73 人(98.65%)检测出抗药物抗体(ADA)阳性。他们的中和抗体检测结果均为阳性。治疗组之间未发现其他明显的安全性差异。总之,两种给药方式均表现出 PK 等效性,且安全性和耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
期刊最新文献
Non-alkylating agents-induced gonadotoxicity in pre-pubertal males: Insights on the clinical and pre-clinical front What motivates people with type 2 diabetes mellitus to participate in clinical trials from home? Randomized evaluation of the loss-of-function carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) G143E variant on clopidogrel and ticagrelor pharmacodynamics Effects of statins in patients with coronary artery spasm: A nationwide population-based study Use cases of registry-based randomized controlled trials—A review of the registries' contributions and constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1