Use of Loco-regional Anesthesia in Austere Environments: A Review by and for Special Forces Medics.

Anonymous Anonymous, Michael R Hetzler
{"title":"Use of Loco-regional Anesthesia in Austere Environments: A Review by and for Special Forces Medics.","authors":"Anonymous Anonymous, Michael R Hetzler","doi":"10.55460/YUZF-3SF0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Special Forces increasingly operate in austere environments, which are known to have limited medical support and prolonged evacuation times. On the battlefield, pain remains the first complaint of casualties and can impact direct autonomic stability, recovery, and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Although medical education has been improving, medical providers still encounter difficulties, such as lack of human and material resources, while trying to achieve pain management. This article summarizes a survey sent to 35 Special Operations medical providers and suggests possible strategies to address challenges to pain management on the battlefield. Potential solutions have been gathered through medical texts, medical/NATO documents, and medical expertise. Nerves blocks have been identified as valuable tools for pain management in the current battlefield environment, where prolonged evacuation and limited freedom of movement are the norm. The survey showed that, although the vast majority of providers had already received lectures on regional anesthesia, 83% were not trained in it, and 54% had never been made aware of multimodal analgesia. This lack of familiarity highlights knowledge and training gaps in nerve block techniques. Diffusion blocks are a very low-risk, useful, and safe pain management technique, which requires less skill sustainment and resources than more complex techniques. The use of epinephrine as adjunct can be useful for decreasing local anesthetic toxicity and increasing long-term pain management. The need for both education on and training in the use of nerve blocks has been identified by the Special Operations health provider community.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"90-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/YUZF-3SF0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Special Forces increasingly operate in austere environments, which are known to have limited medical support and prolonged evacuation times. On the battlefield, pain remains the first complaint of casualties and can impact direct autonomic stability, recovery, and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Although medical education has been improving, medical providers still encounter difficulties, such as lack of human and material resources, while trying to achieve pain management. This article summarizes a survey sent to 35 Special Operations medical providers and suggests possible strategies to address challenges to pain management on the battlefield. Potential solutions have been gathered through medical texts, medical/NATO documents, and medical expertise. Nerves blocks have been identified as valuable tools for pain management in the current battlefield environment, where prolonged evacuation and limited freedom of movement are the norm. The survey showed that, although the vast majority of providers had already received lectures on regional anesthesia, 83% were not trained in it, and 54% had never been made aware of multimodal analgesia. This lack of familiarity highlights knowledge and training gaps in nerve block techniques. Diffusion blocks are a very low-risk, useful, and safe pain management technique, which requires less skill sustainment and resources than more complex techniques. The use of epinephrine as adjunct can be useful for decreasing local anesthetic toxicity and increasing long-term pain management. The need for both education on and training in the use of nerve blocks has been identified by the Special Operations health provider community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在恶劣环境中使用局部麻醉:由特种部队医护人员撰写并为其撰写的综述。
特种部队越来越多地在艰苦的环境中工作,众所周知,这种环境的医疗支持有限,撤离时间也很长。在战场上,疼痛仍然是伤员的第一主诉,会直接影响自律神经的稳定性、恢复和创伤后应激障碍的发展。尽管医学教育在不断改进,但医疗服务人员在努力实现疼痛管理的过程中仍会遇到人力和物力资源匮乏等困难。本文总结了对 35 名特种作战医疗提供者的调查,并提出了应对战场疼痛管理挑战的可能策略。潜在的解决方案是通过医学文献、医学/北约文件和医学专业知识收集而来的。神经阻滞被认为是当前战场环境下疼痛管理的重要工具,在这种环境下,长时间撤离和有限的行动自由是常态。调查显示,虽然绝大多数医疗服务提供者已经接受过区域麻醉方面的讲座,但 83% 的人没有接受过这方面的培训,54% 的人从未了解过多模式镇痛。这种缺乏了解的情况凸显了神经阻滞技术方面的知识和培训缺口。弥散阻滞是一种风险极低、有用且安全的疼痛治疗技术,与更复杂的技术相比,它所需的技能维持和资源更少。使用肾上腺素作为辅助手段可有效降低局麻药毒性,提高长期疼痛控制效果。特种作战医护人员团体已确定需要开展有关使用神经阻滞的教育和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Abdominal Aortic Junctional Tourniquets: Clinically Important Increases in Pressure in Aortic Zone 1 and Zone 3 in a Cadaveric Study Directly Relevant to Combat Medics Treating Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage. Chronicity of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison of Special Operators and Conventional Forces. On Saving - The Psychosocial Benefit of Saving Lives in War and Society. Rethinking the Operational Blood Bank Dilemma: Out of the "Box" Blood Storage and Transportation Evaluation. Special Forces Medics Ability to Identify Wooden Foreign Bodies by Point-of-Care Ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1