A Biomechanical Analysis of Oblique Metacarpal Metadiaphyseal Fracture Fixation in a Cadaver Model.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.009
Edgar Garcia-Lopez, Jeremy Wafong Siu, Jeffrey W Kwong, Robin N Kamal, Nicole Schroeder, Lauren M Shapiro
{"title":"A Biomechanical Analysis of Oblique Metacarpal Metadiaphyseal Fracture Fixation in a Cadaver Model.","authors":"Edgar Garcia-Lopez, Jeremy Wafong Siu, Jeffrey W Kwong, Robin N Kamal, Nicole Schroeder, Lauren M Shapiro","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although metacarpal fractures are typically managed nonoperatively, when surgical management is indicated, metacarpal fractures are commonly treated with crossed Kirschner wires (K-wires), which may limit early range of motion. Intramedullary implants are increasing in use with the potential advantage of early range of motion; however, stability in oblique metacarpal neck fractures remains a theoretical concern. The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical stability of noncompressive intramedullary fixation for oblique metacarpal neck fractures compared with crossed K-wire fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The index, long, and small metacarpals were harvested from three matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadavers. Oblique fractures at the metadiaphyseal region were created in each metacarpal. Each metacarpal was randomized to noncompressive, threaded intramedullary nail fixation or fixation with two crossed K-wires. Specimens were mounted in a Materials Testing System load frame and axially loaded until failure. Load to failure (LTF), stiffness, and load to 2 mm displacement were calculated from load-displacement curves. Differences in peak LTF, stiffness, and load to 2 mm displacement between noncompressive intramedullary fixation and crossed K-wire fixation were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The noncompressive intramedullary fixation cohort had a significantly higher LTF (1,190.9 ± 534.7 N vs 297.0 ± 156.0 N) and stiffness (551.3 ± 164.6 N/mm vs 283.0 ± 194.5 N/mm) when compared with the crossed K-wire fixation cohort. Load at 2 mm displacement was greater in the noncompressive intramedullary fixation cohort compared with crossed K-wire fixation (820.5 ± 203.9 vs 514.1 ± 259.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For oblique metadiaphyseal metacarpal fractures, noncompressive intramedullary fixation provides a biomechanically superior construct under axial loading in terms of LTF, stiffness, and load to 2 mm of displacement compared with crossed K-wire fixation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Noncompressive intramedullary nails may be an alternative to K-wire fixation for the treatment of oblique metadiaphyseal metacarpal fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.08.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although metacarpal fractures are typically managed nonoperatively, when surgical management is indicated, metacarpal fractures are commonly treated with crossed Kirschner wires (K-wires), which may limit early range of motion. Intramedullary implants are increasing in use with the potential advantage of early range of motion; however, stability in oblique metacarpal neck fractures remains a theoretical concern. The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical stability of noncompressive intramedullary fixation for oblique metacarpal neck fractures compared with crossed K-wire fixation.

Methods: The index, long, and small metacarpals were harvested from three matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadavers. Oblique fractures at the metadiaphyseal region were created in each metacarpal. Each metacarpal was randomized to noncompressive, threaded intramedullary nail fixation or fixation with two crossed K-wires. Specimens were mounted in a Materials Testing System load frame and axially loaded until failure. Load to failure (LTF), stiffness, and load to 2 mm displacement were calculated from load-displacement curves. Differences in peak LTF, stiffness, and load to 2 mm displacement between noncompressive intramedullary fixation and crossed K-wire fixation were evaluated.

Results: The noncompressive intramedullary fixation cohort had a significantly higher LTF (1,190.9 ± 534.7 N vs 297.0 ± 156.0 N) and stiffness (551.3 ± 164.6 N/mm vs 283.0 ± 194.5 N/mm) when compared with the crossed K-wire fixation cohort. Load at 2 mm displacement was greater in the noncompressive intramedullary fixation cohort compared with crossed K-wire fixation (820.5 ± 203.9 vs 514.1 ± 259.6).

Conclusions: For oblique metadiaphyseal metacarpal fractures, noncompressive intramedullary fixation provides a biomechanically superior construct under axial loading in terms of LTF, stiffness, and load to 2 mm of displacement compared with crossed K-wire fixation.

Clinical relevance: Noncompressive intramedullary nails may be an alternative to K-wire fixation for the treatment of oblique metadiaphyseal metacarpal fractures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尸体模型中斜向掌骨骨干骨折固定的生物力学分析
目的:尽管掌骨骨折通常采用非手术治疗,但在需要手术治疗时,掌骨骨折通常采用交叉Kirschner钢丝(K钢丝)治疗,这可能会限制早期活动范围。髓内植入物的使用越来越多,具有早期活动范围大的潜在优势;但理论上,掌骨颈斜形骨折的稳定性仍是一个值得关注的问题。本研究的目的是确定非压缩性髓内固定治疗掌骨斜颈骨折的生物力学稳定性,并与交叉K线固定进行比较:方法:从三对匹配的新鲜冷冻尸体上采集食指、长掌骨和小掌骨。在每个掌骨的骨骺区创建斜形骨折。每个掌骨被随机分配为非加压螺纹髓内钉固定或用两根交叉的 K 型钢丝固定。将试样安装在材料测试系统的加载框架中,并进行轴向加载直至失效。根据载荷-位移曲线计算破坏载荷(LTF)、刚度和 2 毫米位移载荷。评估了非压缩性髓内固定和交叉K线固定的峰值LTF、刚度和2毫米位移载荷的差异:结果:与交叉 K 线固定队列相比,非加压髓内固定队列的 LTF(1,190.9 ± 534.7 N vs 297.0 ± 156.0 N)和硬度(551.3 ± 164.6 N/mm vs 283.0 ± 194.5 N/mm)明显更高。与交叉K线固定相比,非加压髓内固定组在2毫米位移时的载荷更大(820.5 ± 203.9 vs 514.1 ± 259.6):结论:对于偏斜的掌骨骺端骨折,与交叉K线固定相比,非加压髓内固定在轴向加载下的LTF、刚度和移位2毫米时的载荷方面具有更优越的生物力学结构:非压缩性髓内钉可替代 K 型钢丝固定治疗掌骨偏斜性骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A Percutaneous Triple K-Wire Fixation Technique for Nascent Malunion of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocation: A Case Series With an Assessment of Functional Outcome. Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Hand Infections. Mid-Term Outcomes Following Trapeziectomy With Suture Suspensionplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis. Passive Mobilization With Place-and-Hold Versus Active Mobilization Therapy After Flexor Tendon Repair: 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. The Learning Curves of Adelaide- and Gan-Modified Lim-Tsai Flexor Tendon Repair Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1