Changing relationship between income inequality and mortality.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1136/jech-2024-223088
Michael Murphy
{"title":"Changing relationship between income inequality and mortality.","authors":"Michael Murphy","doi":"10.1136/jech-2024-223088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent paper by Dunn <i>et al</i> showed that the positive relationship between US state-level income inequality and mortality was small in the 1950s, rose to a large value around 1990 but had largely disappeared by 2019. We consider these findings in the context of the mechanisms that have been advanced for reasons why a positive relationship might be expected, and in relation to studies using alternative methods included in systematic reviews that fail to confirm an independent inequality/mortality relationship. Ecological studies, such as by Dunn <i>et al</i>, using subnational data have advantages compared with similar studies using cross-national data, but controls are typically confined to those available from sources such as decennial census, so scope for incorporating lagged effects and life course factors is limited. However, they are often the only studies with the statistical power to identify subnational differentials and time trends so they are complementary to rarely available sources such as high-quality long-term individual-level microdata data required for causal analyses. Income equality can arise not only due to citizens' positive preferences but also to external choices such as economic decline and globalisation, so examining the wider context is important when explaining excess levels of 'deaths of despair' in low-inequality US states. The apparent increasingly strong association between income levels and low mortality with a weakening inequality/mortality relationship has implications for policy recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54839,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"782-784"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2024-223088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent paper by Dunn et al showed that the positive relationship between US state-level income inequality and mortality was small in the 1950s, rose to a large value around 1990 but had largely disappeared by 2019. We consider these findings in the context of the mechanisms that have been advanced for reasons why a positive relationship might be expected, and in relation to studies using alternative methods included in systematic reviews that fail to confirm an independent inequality/mortality relationship. Ecological studies, such as by Dunn et al, using subnational data have advantages compared with similar studies using cross-national data, but controls are typically confined to those available from sources such as decennial census, so scope for incorporating lagged effects and life course factors is limited. However, they are often the only studies with the statistical power to identify subnational differentials and time trends so they are complementary to rarely available sources such as high-quality long-term individual-level microdata data required for causal analyses. Income equality can arise not only due to citizens' positive preferences but also to external choices such as economic decline and globalisation, so examining the wider context is important when explaining excess levels of 'deaths of despair' in low-inequality US states. The apparent increasingly strong association between income levels and low mortality with a weakening inequality/mortality relationship has implications for policy recommendations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收入不平等与死亡率之间不断变化的关系。
Dunn 等人最近的论文显示,美国各州收入不平等与死亡率之间的正相关关系在 20 世纪 50 年代很小,在 1990 年左右上升到一个很大的数值,但到 2019 年已基本消失。我们在研究这些发现时,考虑到了人们提出的可能会产生正相关关系的机制,以及系统综述中使用替代方法进行的研究,这些研究未能证实独立的不平等/死亡率关系。与使用跨国数据的类似研究相比,使用次国家数据的生态学研究(如 Dunn 等人的研究)具有优势,但控制通常仅限于从十年一次的人口普查等来源获得的数据,因此纳入滞后效应和生命过程因素的范围有限。不过,这些研究往往是唯一具有统计能力来确定国家以下各级差异和时间趋势的研究,因此它们是对很少有的来源(如因果分析所需的高质量长期个人微观数据)的补充。收入平等的产生不仅是由于公民的积极偏好,也可能是由于经济衰退和全球化等外部选择,因此,在解释美国低质量州 "绝望死亡 "人数过多的原因时,研究更广泛的背景非常重要。收入水平与低死亡率之间的关联明显越来越强,而不平等/死亡率之间的关系却越来越弱,这对政策建议具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health is a leading international journal devoted to publication of original research and reviews covering applied, methodological and theoretical issues with emphasis on studies using multidisciplinary or integrative approaches. The journal aims to improve epidemiological knowledge and ultimately health worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Health characteristics and health behaviours in male former contact sports participants: comparison with general population controls in a Finnish cohort study. Association of food insecurity with mental health status, mental health services utilisation and general healthcare utilisation among US adults. Diabetes and suicide: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study among the Japanese working-age population. Sleep regularity and major adverse cardiovascular events: a device-based prospective study in 72 269 UK adults. Trends in physical fitness among Lithuanian adolescents aged 11-17 years between 1992 and 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1