Short Form of Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Adults: Psychometric Properties of Serbian Version.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/00469580241274031
Marina Kovacevic Lepojevic, Ana Radanovic, Marija Trajkovic, Luka Mijatovic, Isidora Micic
{"title":"Short Form of Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire for Adults: Psychometric Properties of Serbian Version.","authors":"Marina Kovacevic Lepojevic, Ana Radanovic, Marija Trajkovic, Luka Mijatovic, Isidora Micic","doi":"10.1177/00469580241274031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> Mental health literacy (MHL) has been widely explored by researchers who focus on youth mental health. However, there is little data related to the validity and reliability of the tools for the assessment of MHL constructs. The present study aimed to adapt the short version of Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire for young adults in Serbian sample and examine its psychometric properties. Translation and adaptation of items were performed using the following procedures: item are translated from English or Serbian by a bilingual translator and using a think-aloud procedure, back-translation, semantic comparison of the translation, and analysis of the translated version by the original version of the manuscript. The sample consisted of 344 participants aged 17 to 25 years, which is in accordance with the recommended number of participants needed for quantitative instrument validation studies. Confirmatory factor, internal consistency, and external validity analyses were performed. The results supported the validity of a shorter version of the questionnaire (MHLq-SVa), composed of 16 items that fit with four previously defined MHL dimensions (knowledge, beliefs, help-seeking intentions, and self-help strategies). Internal consistency, between-factor correlations, and correlations with other relevant mental health constructs further supported the adequacy of the instrument's psychometric properties. We recommend the MHLq-SVa as valid and reliable measure for assessing MHL in young adults and encourage further exploration at more diverse and representative samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11437545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241274031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

 Mental health literacy (MHL) has been widely explored by researchers who focus on youth mental health. However, there is little data related to the validity and reliability of the tools for the assessment of MHL constructs. The present study aimed to adapt the short version of Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire for young adults in Serbian sample and examine its psychometric properties. Translation and adaptation of items were performed using the following procedures: item are translated from English or Serbian by a bilingual translator and using a think-aloud procedure, back-translation, semantic comparison of the translation, and analysis of the translated version by the original version of the manuscript. The sample consisted of 344 participants aged 17 to 25 years, which is in accordance with the recommended number of participants needed for quantitative instrument validation studies. Confirmatory factor, internal consistency, and external validity analyses were performed. The results supported the validity of a shorter version of the questionnaire (MHLq-SVa), composed of 16 items that fit with four previously defined MHL dimensions (knowledge, beliefs, help-seeking intentions, and self-help strategies). Internal consistency, between-factor correlations, and correlations with other relevant mental health constructs further supported the adequacy of the instrument's psychometric properties. We recommend the MHLq-SVa as valid and reliable measure for assessing MHL in young adults and encourage further exploration at more diverse and representative samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人心理健康素养问卷简表:塞尔维亚语版本的心理测量特性
关注青少年心理健康的研究人员对心理健康素养(MHL)进行了广泛的探索。然而,有关心理健康素养结构评估工具的有效性和可靠性的数据却很少。本研究旨在为塞尔维亚样本中的年轻成年人改编心理健康素养问卷的简短版本,并检查其心理测量特性。项目的翻译和改编采用了以下程序:由一名双语译者从英语或塞尔维亚语翻译项目,并采用思考-朗读程序、回译、翻译语义比较以及将翻译版本与原稿版本进行分析。样本由 344 名年龄在 17-25 岁之间的参与者组成,符合定量工具验证研究的建议人数。研究进行了确认性因子、内部一致性和外部效度分析。结果证明了简短版问卷(MHLq-SVa)的有效性,该问卷由 16 个项目组成,符合之前定义的 MHL 四个维度(知识、信念、求助意向和自助策略)。内部一致性、因素间相关性以及与其他相关心理健康结构的相关性进一步证明了该工具的心理测量特性。我们建议将 MHLq-SVa 作为评估青壮年 MHL 的有效、可靠的测量工具,并鼓励在更具多样性和代表性的样本中进行进一步的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Patient Autonomy in Medical Education: Navigating Ethical Challenges in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Developing the First Digital Occupational Therapy Dictionary Worldwide: A Promising Mobile Application Model for Occupational Therapy Service Providers and Recipients Highlighting the Neuropsychological Consequences of COVID-19: Evidence From a Narrative Review Adverse Drug Reactions Resulting From the Use of Chiral Medicines Amoxicillin, Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid, and Ceftriaxone: A Mixed Prospective-Retrospective Cohort Study Social Determinants Influencing the Non-Adoption of Norms Favorable to the Prevention and Control of Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1