[Focused High-Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) for Bone healing Disorders of the Forearm and the Hand].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1055/a-2406-5858
Eva-Kristina Liedl, Jörg van Schoonhoven, Karl-Josef Prommersberger, Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor
{"title":"[Focused High-Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) for Bone healing Disorders of the Forearm and the Hand].","authors":"Eva-Kristina Liedl, Jörg van Schoonhoven, Karl-Josef Prommersberger, Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor","doi":"10.1055/a-2406-5858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ESWT is a non-surgical treatment option but can also be used in addition to surgical treatment (stabilisation, freshening, defect filling, removal of discomforting osteosynthesis material) for the treatment of delayed bone healing (DBH) and non-union (NU). Its value as well as influencing factors on the upper extremity have not been adequately quantified so far.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Sixty cases were retrospectively studied after application of focused high-energy ESWT with regard to healing rate and consolidation time. The influence of age, location, time of treatment and treatment prior to and concurrent with ESWT were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 70% of the cases, healing occurred after a median of 2.4 months (DBH) and 2.8 months (NU). The median age of healed (DBH 44 y., non-union 35 y.) and non-healed (DBH 51 y., NU 37 y.) did not differ significantly. The time between trauma/surgery and ESWT was 4.2 months for DBH in healed and 3.7 months in non-healed without a significant difference, and 27 months for NU in both healed and non-healed. Age and smoking status also had no influence. The healing rate was highest at metacarpal bone/finger/thumb (91%), followed by forearm shaft (88%), epiphysis/metaphysis of the forearm (67%), and, lastly, carpal bones (59%). After conservative pre-treatment, 55% healed, compared with 67% after more than two previous surgeries, 73% without any pre-treatment, and 75% after one previous surgery. Further analysis of surgical pre-treatment showed 85% healing after ORIF alone, 64% without previous surgery, and 57% healing after ORIF with bone grafting/debridement. Intraoperative ESWT combined with bone debridement/transplantation and ORIF resulted in 67% healing, compared with 86% in combination with ORIF alone. ESWT alone or with only minimal measures (removal of osteosynthesis material) led to 70% consolidation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESWT is equally effective at any stage of a bone healing disorder. The principles of stability and filling of bone defects must also be taken into account when using ESWT; then ESWT alone or combined with surgery is equally effective. The negative influence of bone defects/resorption is still detectable even with ESWT. Furthermore, treatment of the scaphoid is more problematic compared with other locations. Previous surgery is not a negative factor, even with osteosynthesis material in situ.</p>","PeriodicalId":55075,"journal":{"name":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","volume":"56 5","pages":"350-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2406-5858","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ESWT is a non-surgical treatment option but can also be used in addition to surgical treatment (stabilisation, freshening, defect filling, removal of discomforting osteosynthesis material) for the treatment of delayed bone healing (DBH) and non-union (NU). Its value as well as influencing factors on the upper extremity have not been adequately quantified so far.

Patients and methods: Sixty cases were retrospectively studied after application of focused high-energy ESWT with regard to healing rate and consolidation time. The influence of age, location, time of treatment and treatment prior to and concurrent with ESWT were analysed.

Results: In 70% of the cases, healing occurred after a median of 2.4 months (DBH) and 2.8 months (NU). The median age of healed (DBH 44 y., non-union 35 y.) and non-healed (DBH 51 y., NU 37 y.) did not differ significantly. The time between trauma/surgery and ESWT was 4.2 months for DBH in healed and 3.7 months in non-healed without a significant difference, and 27 months for NU in both healed and non-healed. Age and smoking status also had no influence. The healing rate was highest at metacarpal bone/finger/thumb (91%), followed by forearm shaft (88%), epiphysis/metaphysis of the forearm (67%), and, lastly, carpal bones (59%). After conservative pre-treatment, 55% healed, compared with 67% after more than two previous surgeries, 73% without any pre-treatment, and 75% after one previous surgery. Further analysis of surgical pre-treatment showed 85% healing after ORIF alone, 64% without previous surgery, and 57% healing after ORIF with bone grafting/debridement. Intraoperative ESWT combined with bone debridement/transplantation and ORIF resulted in 67% healing, compared with 86% in combination with ORIF alone. ESWT alone or with only minimal measures (removal of osteosynthesis material) led to 70% consolidation.

Conclusion: ESWT is equally effective at any stage of a bone healing disorder. The principles of stability and filling of bone defects must also be taken into account when using ESWT; then ESWT alone or combined with surgery is equally effective. The negative influence of bone defects/resorption is still detectable even with ESWT. Furthermore, treatment of the scaphoid is more problematic compared with other locations. Previous surgery is not a negative factor, even with osteosynthesis material in situ.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[聚焦高能体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗前臂和手部骨愈合疾病]。
背景:ESWT 是一种非手术治疗方法,但也可作为手术治疗(稳定、新鲜、缺陷填充、去除不适的骨合成材料)的补充,用于治疗骨延迟愈合(DBH)和骨不连(NU)。迄今为止,其价值以及对上肢的影响因素尚未得到充分量化:回顾性研究了 60 例应用聚焦高能 ESWT 后的愈合率和巩固时间。分析了年龄、部位、治疗时间以及 ESWT 之前和同时进行的治疗的影响:在 70% 的病例中,痊愈时间的中位数分别为 2.4 个月(DBH)和 2.8 个月(NU)。痊愈(DBH 44 岁,未愈合 35 岁)和未痊愈(DBH 51 岁,NU 37 岁)病例的中位年龄差异不大。创伤/手术与 ESWT 之间的间隔时间,痊愈的 DBH 为 4.2 个月,未痊愈的为 3.7 个月,无明显差异;痊愈和未痊愈的 NU 均为 27 个月。年龄和吸烟状况也没有影响。愈合率最高的是掌骨/手指/拇指(91%),其次是前臂轴(88%)、前臂骨骺/骨骺(67%),最后是腕骨(59%)。经过保守预处理后,55%的患者痊愈,而经过两次以上手术的患者痊愈率为 67%,未经任何预处理的患者痊愈率为 73%,经过一次手术的患者痊愈率为 75%。对手术前治疗的进一步分析表明,单纯手术切除术后痊愈率为85%,未进行手术切除术后痊愈率为64%,手术切除术并植骨/清创术后痊愈率为57%。术中 ESWT 结合骨清创/移植和手术切除术的愈合率为 67%,而单纯手术切除术的愈合率为 86%。单纯 ESWT 或仅采取最低限度的措施(去除骨合成材料)可使 70% 的骨愈合:结论:ESWT 在骨愈合障碍的任何阶段都同样有效。结论:ESWT 在骨愈合障碍的任何阶段都同样有效。在使用 ESWT 时,还必须考虑到骨缺损的稳定性和填充原则;因此,ESWT 单独使用或与手术相结合都同样有效。即使使用 ESWT,仍可检测到骨缺损/骨吸收的负面影响。此外,与其他部位相比,肩胛骨的治疗问题更多。即使在原位使用骨合成材料,之前的手术也不是负面因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten finden Sie die neuesten Informationen über: Diagnostik Verfahrenswahl state of the art / neueste Techniken rekonstruktive Verfahren Behandlung infolge von Traumata oder OP Bewertung der Ergebnisse Klinische Forschung Interessante Darstellung der neuesten Erkenntnisse in Originalarbeiten und Fallberichten. Exzellent veranschaulicht durch ein klares Layout und reiche Bebilderung. Überzeugen Sie sich selbst! Organschaften Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Handchirurgie, Deutschen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie und Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft der Plastischen, Rekonstruktiven und Ästhetischen Chirurgen
期刊最新文献
Unusual finger infection:  Candida magnoliae-associated arthritis/osteomyelitis and gout without a history of prior gout attacks. [Is networking in international societies dispensable in Plastic Surgery? Clear vote in favour of ESPRAS and ICOPLAST at the 54th Annual Conference of the DGPRÄC in Düsseldorf]. On occasion of the "ESPRAS - A day in Sarajevo" meeting at the 13th BAFPRAS Congress. [Postoperative Pain Level Following Surgery of the Hand and Wrist in the Ambulatory Setting]. [Palmar Displacement in Distal Radius Fractures following Extension Injuries of the Wrist].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1