Disentangling conflicting molecular phylogenetic signals in nuclear and plastid DNA of the western Eurasian-Mediterranean grass genus Cynosurus and its relatives (Poaceae subtribes Cynosurinae and Parapholiinae)

IF 3.6 1区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108204
Natalia Tkach , Sirus Leonard Rasti , Martin Röser
{"title":"Disentangling conflicting molecular phylogenetic signals in nuclear and plastid DNA of the western Eurasian-Mediterranean grass genus Cynosurus and its relatives (Poaceae subtribes Cynosurinae and Parapholiinae)","authors":"Natalia Tkach ,&nbsp;Sirus Leonard Rasti ,&nbsp;Martin Röser","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The western Eurasian-Mediterranean grass genus <em>Cynosurus</em>, comprising about 11 species, is morphologically well delimited by the regular occurrence of conspicuous sterile spikelets distal to the fertile ones on the outer, abaxial side of the inflorescences. However, our molecular phylogenetic study using nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS, ETS) and plastid DNA sequences (<em>trnL–F</em>, <em>matK</em>) has shown that the genus is not monophyletic in its current delimitation, but consists of three distinct lineages. These lineages were found to be closely related to a group of 6–7 genera taxonomically assigned to the subtribe Parapholiinae. These Parapholiinae genera were consistently monophyletic in our analyses, but the suggested relationships to the three lineages of <em>Cynosurus</em> varied depending on the particular DNA region examined. This was the case for both plastid and nuclear DNA, with cytonuclear discordance and ‘chloroplast capture’ indicating earlier hybridization. Interestingly, hybridization also proved to be the most likely explanation even with regard to the 18S–26S cistrons of the nuclear ribosomal DNA, where an exceptional evolutionary divergence between ITS and ETS was found. The results highlight and illustrate the important role of hybridization in the evolution of grasses. In terms of taxonomy, our findings argue against maintaining a polyphyletic genus <em>Cynosurus s.l.</em> but instead argue for dividing it into three monophyletic genera: <em>Cynosurus s.s.</em>, <em>Falona</em>, which is reestablished here, and <em>Ciliochloa</em>, which is described as a new genus. In addition, it is proposed that the two subtribes Cynosurinae and Parapholiinae be combined into a single subtribe Cynosurinae, which is also monophyletic. The possible genetic background of the formation of sterile spikelets and the occasional occurrence of inflorescences with consistently fertile spikelets are discussed. New combinations are <em>Ciliochloa effusa</em>, <em>C. effusa</em> var. <em>obliquata</em>, <em>C. effusa</em> var. <em>fertilis</em>, <em>C. elegans, C. gracilis, C. turcomanica</em> and <em>Falona colorata</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56109,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 108204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790324001969","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The western Eurasian-Mediterranean grass genus Cynosurus, comprising about 11 species, is morphologically well delimited by the regular occurrence of conspicuous sterile spikelets distal to the fertile ones on the outer, abaxial side of the inflorescences. However, our molecular phylogenetic study using nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS, ETS) and plastid DNA sequences (trnL–F, matK) has shown that the genus is not monophyletic in its current delimitation, but consists of three distinct lineages. These lineages were found to be closely related to a group of 6–7 genera taxonomically assigned to the subtribe Parapholiinae. These Parapholiinae genera were consistently monophyletic in our analyses, but the suggested relationships to the three lineages of Cynosurus varied depending on the particular DNA region examined. This was the case for both plastid and nuclear DNA, with cytonuclear discordance and ‘chloroplast capture’ indicating earlier hybridization. Interestingly, hybridization also proved to be the most likely explanation even with regard to the 18S–26S cistrons of the nuclear ribosomal DNA, where an exceptional evolutionary divergence between ITS and ETS was found. The results highlight and illustrate the important role of hybridization in the evolution of grasses. In terms of taxonomy, our findings argue against maintaining a polyphyletic genus Cynosurus s.l. but instead argue for dividing it into three monophyletic genera: Cynosurus s.s., Falona, which is reestablished here, and Ciliochloa, which is described as a new genus. In addition, it is proposed that the two subtribes Cynosurinae and Parapholiinae be combined into a single subtribe Cynosurinae, which is also monophyletic. The possible genetic background of the formation of sterile spikelets and the occasional occurrence of inflorescences with consistently fertile spikelets are discussed. New combinations are Ciliochloa effusa, C. effusa var. obliquata, C. effusa var. fertilis, C. elegans, C. gracilis, C. turcomanica and Falona colorata.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厘清欧亚-地中海西部禾本科草属(Cynosurus)及其近缘种(Poaceae 亚种 Cynosurinae 和 Parapholiinae)核DNA 和质粒 DNA 中相互矛盾的分子系统发育信号。
西欧亚-地中海禾本科草属(Cynosurus)约有 11 个种,在花序外侧、背面的可育小穗远端经常出现明显的不育小穗,这在形态上很好地划分了该属。然而,我们利用核核糖体 DNA(ITS、ETS)和质体 DNA 序列(trnL-F、matK)进行的分子系统学研究表明,该属目前的划分不是单系的,而是由三个不同的系组成。研究发现,这些支系与在分类学上被归入 Parapholiinae 亚族的 6-7 个属密切相关。在我们的分析中,这些 Parapholiinae 属始终是单系的,但与 Cynosurus 的三个系的关系因所研究的 DNA 区域而异。质体和核 DNA 的情况都是如此,细胞核不一致和 "叶绿体捕获 "表明杂交较早。有趣的是,即使在核核糖体 DNA 的 18S-26S 三元组方面,杂交也被证明是最有可能的解释,因为在核核糖体 DNA 的 18S-26S 三元组中,ITS 和 ETS 之间存在特殊的进化差异。这些结果突出说明了杂交在禾本科植物进化过程中的重要作用。在分类学方面,我们的研究结果反对保留 Cynosurus s.l.这一多系属,而主张将其分为三个单系属:Cynosurus s.s.、Falona(在此重新确立)和 Ciliochloa(描述为一个新属)。此外,还建议将 Cynosurinae 和 Parapholiinae 两个亚族合并为单一的 Cynosurinae 亚族,该亚族也是单系的。讨论了不育小穗形成的可能遗传背景以及偶尔出现的具有持续可育小穗的花序。C. effusa var. obliquata、C. effusa var. fertilis、C. elegans、C. gracilis、C. turcomanica 和 Falona colorata。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
249
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution is dedicated to bringing Darwin''s dream within grasp - to "have fairly true genealogical trees of each great kingdom of Nature." The journal provides a forum for molecular studies that advance our understanding of phylogeny and evolution, further the development of phylogenetically more accurate taxonomic classifications, and ultimately bring a unified classification for all the ramifying lines of life. Phylogeographic studies will be considered for publication if they offer EXCEPTIONAL theoretical or empirical advances.
期刊最新文献
Retraction notice to "Phylogenomic data exploration with increased sampling provides new insights into the higher-level relationships of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera)" [Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 197 (2024) 108113]. Species delimitation and historical biogeography of Sturisoma Swainson, 1838 (Loricariidae: Loricariinae): Hidden diversity along the Amazon River Gondwanan relic or recent arrival? The biogeographic origins and systematics of Australian tarantulas. Forget-me-not phylogenomics: Improving the resolution and taxonomy of a rapid island and mountain radiation in Aotearoa New Zealand (Myosotis; Boraginaceae). Taken to extremes: Loss of plastid rpl32 in Streptophyta and Cuscuta's unconventional solution for its replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1