Dosage and utilization of dexamethasone in the management of COVID-19: A critical review.

Imran Sethi, Asim Shaikh, Musa Sethi, Hira Khalid Chohan, Sheraz Younus, Syed A Khan, Salim Surani
{"title":"Dosage and utilization of dexamethasone in the management of COVID-19: A critical review.","authors":"Imran Sethi, Asim Shaikh, Musa Sethi, Hira Khalid Chohan, Sheraz Younus, Syed A Khan, Salim Surani","doi":"10.5501/wjv.v13.i3.95709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The severe respiratory manifestations observed in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases are often associated with an excessive inflammatory response. Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid, exerts its anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the transcription of pro-inflammatory genes and suppressing the activity of various immune cells. This mechanism has implications for mitigating the cytokine storm observed in severe COVID-19 cases. Early on in the pandemic, the Recovery Collaborative working group showed a mortality benefit of using dexamethasone in decreasing mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support. However, the optimal dosage of corticosteroids remains debatable. Several studies that compare different doses of dexamethasone in COVID-19 exist, but the results are conflicting.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To review the latest evidence regarding dosage, safety, and efficacy of dexamethasone in severe COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. A detailed literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline to include publications up to March 2024. Our keywords included \"COVID-19\" \"SARS-CoV-2\" \"dexamethasone\" \"corticosteroid\" \"steroid\" and \"glucocorticoid\"-along with their combinations. We employed the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to evaluate the integrity and potential of bias in the included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, assessing pooled odds ratios and mean differences, with heterogeneity gauged by the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic and the <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical differences were found in 28-day all-cause mortality [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 1.109, 95%CI: 0.918-1.340], 60-day all-cause mortality (OR = 0.873, 95%CI: 0.744-1.024; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 47.29%), mean length of hospital stay (mean difference = -0.08 days, 95%CI: -0.001 to 0.161) and adverse events (OR = 0.877, 95%CI: 0.707-1.087).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differing doses of corticosteroids have no clinical implications on mortality, mean length of hospital stay, and adverse events in COVID-19 patients. Additional research is required in patients requiring invasive or non-invasive ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":61903,"journal":{"name":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","volume":"13 3","pages":"95709"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11401006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界病毒学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v13.i3.95709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The severe respiratory manifestations observed in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases are often associated with an excessive inflammatory response. Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid, exerts its anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the transcription of pro-inflammatory genes and suppressing the activity of various immune cells. This mechanism has implications for mitigating the cytokine storm observed in severe COVID-19 cases. Early on in the pandemic, the Recovery Collaborative working group showed a mortality benefit of using dexamethasone in decreasing mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support. However, the optimal dosage of corticosteroids remains debatable. Several studies that compare different doses of dexamethasone in COVID-19 exist, but the results are conflicting.

Aim: To review the latest evidence regarding dosage, safety, and efficacy of dexamethasone in severe COVID-19.

Methods: We followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. A detailed literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline to include publications up to March 2024. Our keywords included "COVID-19" "SARS-CoV-2" "dexamethasone" "corticosteroid" "steroid" and "glucocorticoid"-along with their combinations. We employed the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to evaluate the integrity and potential of bias in the included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, assessing pooled odds ratios and mean differences, with heterogeneity gauged by the I 2 statistic and the χ 2 tests.

Results: No statistical differences were found in 28-day all-cause mortality [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 1.109, 95%CI: 0.918-1.340], 60-day all-cause mortality (OR = 0.873, 95%CI: 0.744-1.024; I 2 = 47.29%), mean length of hospital stay (mean difference = -0.08 days, 95%CI: -0.001 to 0.161) and adverse events (OR = 0.877, 95%CI: 0.707-1.087).

Conclusion: Differing doses of corticosteroids have no clinical implications on mortality, mean length of hospital stay, and adverse events in COVID-19 patients. Additional research is required in patients requiring invasive or non-invasive ventilation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地塞米松在治疗 COVID-19 中的剂量和使用:重要综述。
背景:在严重冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)病例中观察到的严重呼吸道表现往往与过度的炎症反应有关。地塞米松是一种人工合成的糖皮质激素,它通过抑制促炎基因的转录和抑制各种免疫细胞的活性来发挥抗炎作用。这一机制对于缓解 COVID-19 重症病例中观察到的细胞因子风暴具有重要意义。大流行初期,恢复合作工作组的研究表明,使用地塞米松可降低需要呼吸支持的 COVID-19 患者的死亡率。然而,皮质类固醇的最佳剂量仍有待商榷。目的:回顾有关地塞米松治疗重症 COVID-19 的剂量、安全性和疗效的最新证据:方法:我们遵循系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。我们在PubMed、Google Scholar和Medline上进行了详细的文献检索,包括截至2024年3月的出版物。关键词包括 "COVID-19""SARS-CoV-2""地塞米松""皮质类固醇""类固醇 "和 "糖皮质激素 "及其组合。我们采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表来评估纳入研究的完整性和潜在偏倚。我们采用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,评估了汇集的几率比和平均差异,并通过 I 2 统计量和χ 2 检验来衡量异质性:结果:在28天全因死亡率[汇总几率比(OR)=1.109,95%CI:0.918-1.340]、60天全因死亡率(OR=0.873,95%CI:0.744-1.024;I 2=47.29%)、平均住院时间(平均差异=-0.08天,95%CI:-0.001至0.161)和不良事件(OR=0.877,95%CI:0.707-1.087)方面均未发现统计学差异:不同剂量的皮质类固醇对COVID-19患者的死亡率、平均住院时间和不良事件没有临床影响。需要对需要有创或无创通气的患者进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Ambispective epidemiological observational study of varicella-zoster virus infection: An 18 year-single-center Bulgarian experience. Dengue outbreaks in northern Nigeria: Evaluating the recommended Takeda vaccine and future prevention strategies. Dosage and utilization of dexamethasone in the management of COVID-19: A critical review. Human immunodeficiency virus cascade-continuum of care stages and outcomes in a hospital in southern Brazil. Plant-based vaccines against viral hepatitis: A panoptic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1