Assessing disease progression in ALS: prognostic subgroups and outliers.

Inês Alves, Marta Gromicho, Miguel Oliveira Santos, Susana Pinto, Mamede de Carvalho
{"title":"Assessing disease progression in ALS: prognostic subgroups and outliers.","authors":"Inês Alves, Marta Gromicho, Miguel Oliveira Santos, Susana Pinto, Mamede de Carvalho","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2024.2407412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: The rate of disease progression, measured by the decline of ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) from symptom onset to diagnosis (ΔFS) is a well-established prognostic biomarker for predicting survival. <i>Objectives</i>: This study aims to categorize a large patient cohort based on the initial ΔFS and subsequently investigate survival deviations from the expected prognosis defined by ΔFS. <i>Methods</i>: 1056 ALS patients were stratified into three progression categories based on their ΔFS: slow progressors (below 25th percentile), intermediate progressors (between 25th and 75th percentiles), and fast progressors (above 75th percentile). Survival outcomes were classified as short survivors (<2 years), average survivors (2-5 years), and long survivors (>5 years). Clinical and demographic characteristics within each subgroup were then analyzed. <i>Results</i>: ΔFS stratification yielded cutoff values of <0.29, 0.29-1.03, and >1.03 points/month. Long survivors comprised 26% and 21% were short survivors. Six percent of the fast progressors had a life expectancy of more than 5 years, and none of the clinical and demographic characteristics analyzed could fully explain this discrepancy. Conversely, 13% of intermediate progressors lived less than 2 years, according to a short-diagnostic delay in these patients. <i>Discussion</i>: Our study reaffirms ΔFS as a prognostic biomarker for ALS. We disclosed outliers defying anticipated patterns. The observed shift in progression categories underscores the non-linear nature of disease progression. Genetic and unknown biological reasons may explain these deviations. Further research is needed to fully understand modulation of ALS survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2024.2407412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rate of disease progression, measured by the decline of ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) from symptom onset to diagnosis (ΔFS) is a well-established prognostic biomarker for predicting survival. Objectives: This study aims to categorize a large patient cohort based on the initial ΔFS and subsequently investigate survival deviations from the expected prognosis defined by ΔFS. Methods: 1056 ALS patients were stratified into three progression categories based on their ΔFS: slow progressors (below 25th percentile), intermediate progressors (between 25th and 75th percentiles), and fast progressors (above 75th percentile). Survival outcomes were classified as short survivors (<2 years), average survivors (2-5 years), and long survivors (>5 years). Clinical and demographic characteristics within each subgroup were then analyzed. Results: ΔFS stratification yielded cutoff values of <0.29, 0.29-1.03, and >1.03 points/month. Long survivors comprised 26% and 21% were short survivors. Six percent of the fast progressors had a life expectancy of more than 5 years, and none of the clinical and demographic characteristics analyzed could fully explain this discrepancy. Conversely, 13% of intermediate progressors lived less than 2 years, according to a short-diagnostic delay in these patients. Discussion: Our study reaffirms ΔFS as a prognostic biomarker for ALS. We disclosed outliers defying anticipated patterns. The observed shift in progression categories underscores the non-linear nature of disease progression. Genetic and unknown biological reasons may explain these deviations. Further research is needed to fully understand modulation of ALS survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 ALS 的疾病进展:预后亚组和异常值。
背景:以 ALS 功能评定量表-修订版(ALSFRS-R)从症状出现到确诊(ΔFS)期间的下降率来衡量的疾病进展率是预测生存期的成熟预后生物标志物。研究目的本研究旨在根据初始ΔFS对大型患者队列进行分类,并随后调查与ΔFS所定义的预期预后的生存率偏差。方法:根据ΔFS 将 1056 例 ALS 患者分为三个进展类别:进展缓慢者(低于第 25 百分位数)、进展中等者(介于第 25 百分位数和第 75 百分位数之间)和进展迅速者(高于第 75 百分位数)。存活结果按短期存活者(5 年)分类。然后分析每个亚组的临床和人口统计学特征。结果:ΔFS分层得出的临界值为1.03分/月。长期存活者占 26%,短期存活者占 21%。6%的快速进展者预期寿命超过5年,而分析的临床和人口特征均无法完全解释这一差异。相反,13%的中度进展者寿命不到2年,这说明这些患者的诊断延迟时间较短。讨论:我们的研究再次证实ΔFS是ALS的预后生物标志物。我们发现了与预期模式不同的异常值。观察到的疾病进展类别的变化强调了疾病进展的非线性性质。遗传和未知的生物学原因可能解释了这些偏差。要全面了解 ALS 存活率的变化,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ALSUntangled #76: Wahls protocol. Graph theory network analysis reveals widespread white matter damage in brains of patients with classic ALS. Alteration in ornithine metabolism due to mutation in ALDH18A1 masquerading as ALS in pregnancy. Multistep modeling applied to a Malaysian ALS registry. Assessing disease progression in ALS: prognostic subgroups and outliers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1