[Vaccine hesitancy in postpandemic times-A guide for physicians].

Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s00108-024-01784-2
Cornelia Betsch, Sarah Eitze, Lars Korn, Parichehr Shamsrizi, Frederike Taubert
{"title":"[Vaccine hesitancy in postpandemic times-A guide for physicians].","authors":"Cornelia Betsch, Sarah Eitze, Lars Korn, Parichehr Shamsrizi, Frederike Taubert","doi":"10.1007/s00108-024-01784-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emphasized the importance of vaccinations for the prevention of life-threatening diseases and for avoiding the overburdening of the healthcare system. Despite the clear advantage of vaccinations, increasing vaccine hesitancy has been observed worldwide, especially among young people who are potential future parents. Vaccine hesitancy describes the delayed or lack of willingness to utilize recommended vaccinations and represents a substantial challenge for public health. This article analyzes the causes of vaccine hesitancy in the postpandemic period and discusses factors that could make communication successful. The role of artificial intelligence and structured evidence-based discussion techniques, such as the empathetic refutation interview, are emphasized. The aim is to provide practice-oriented recommendations to be able to provide physicians with tools that can help in the education counselling with insecure patients and can promote the acceptance of vaccinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":73385,"journal":{"name":"Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"1056-1065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-024-01784-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emphasized the importance of vaccinations for the prevention of life-threatening diseases and for avoiding the overburdening of the healthcare system. Despite the clear advantage of vaccinations, increasing vaccine hesitancy has been observed worldwide, especially among young people who are potential future parents. Vaccine hesitancy describes the delayed or lack of willingness to utilize recommended vaccinations and represents a substantial challenge for public health. This article analyzes the causes of vaccine hesitancy in the postpandemic period and discusses factors that could make communication successful. The role of artificial intelligence and structured evidence-based discussion techniques, such as the empathetic refutation interview, are emphasized. The aim is to provide practice-oriented recommendations to be able to provide physicians with tools that can help in the education counselling with insecure patients and can promote the acceptance of vaccinations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[流行病后的疫苗犹豫--医生指南]。
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行强调了接种疫苗对于预防威胁生命的疾病和避免医疗系统负担过重的重要性。尽管接种疫苗具有明显的优势,但在全球范围内,人们发现越来越多的人对接种疫苗犹豫不决,尤其是在可能成为未来父母的年轻人中间。疫苗接种犹豫是指延迟接种或不愿意接种推荐的疫苗,是公共卫生面临的巨大挑战。本文分析了疫苗流行后犹豫不决的原因,并讨论了使沟通取得成功的因素。文章强调了人工智能和结构化循证讨论技术(如移情反驳访谈)的作用。目的是提供以实践为导向的建议,以便能够为医生提供有助于对缺乏安全感的患者进行教育咨询的工具,并促进对疫苗接种的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hepatotoxicity due to albendazole: safe alternatives for echinococcosis therapy]. [Striking manifestation and unexpected therapeutic course of diabetes mellitus in a 22-year-old male patient]. [Iscalimab-New treatment option for patients with primary Sjögren's disease]. [Eosinophilic esophagitis]. [Chronic back pain-pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment approaches].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1