Katelyn Dempsey, Joao Matos, Timothy McMahon, Mary Lindsay, James E Tcheng, An-Kwok Ian Wong
{"title":"The high price of equity in pulse oximetry: A cost evaluation and need for interim solutions.","authors":"Katelyn Dempsey, Joao Matos, Timothy McMahon, Mary Lindsay, James E Tcheng, An-Kwok Ian Wong","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disparities in pulse oximetry accuracy, disproportionately affecting patients of color, have been associated with serious clinical outcomes. Although many have called for pulse oximetry hardware replacement, the cost associated with this replacement is not known. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of replacing all current pulse oximetry hardware throughout a hospital system via a single-center survey in 2023 at an academic medical center (Duke University) with three hospitals. The main outcome was the cost of total hardware replacement as identified by current day prices for hardware. New and used prices for 3,542/4,136 (85.6%) across three hospitals for pulse oximetry devices were found. The average cost to replace current pulse oximetry hardware is $6,834.61 per bed. Replacement and integration costs are estimated at $14.2-17.4 million for the entire medical system. Extrapolating these costs to 5,564 hospitals in the United States results in an estimated cost of $8.72 billion. \"Simply replacing\" current pulse oximetry hardware to address disparities may not be simple, cheap, or timely. Solutions for addressing pulse oximetry accuracy disparities leveraging current technology may be necessary, and might also be better. Trial Registration: Pro00113724, exempt.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 9","pages":"e0000372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Disparities in pulse oximetry accuracy, disproportionately affecting patients of color, have been associated with serious clinical outcomes. Although many have called for pulse oximetry hardware replacement, the cost associated with this replacement is not known. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of replacing all current pulse oximetry hardware throughout a hospital system via a single-center survey in 2023 at an academic medical center (Duke University) with three hospitals. The main outcome was the cost of total hardware replacement as identified by current day prices for hardware. New and used prices for 3,542/4,136 (85.6%) across three hospitals for pulse oximetry devices were found. The average cost to replace current pulse oximetry hardware is $6,834.61 per bed. Replacement and integration costs are estimated at $14.2-17.4 million for the entire medical system. Extrapolating these costs to 5,564 hospitals in the United States results in an estimated cost of $8.72 billion. "Simply replacing" current pulse oximetry hardware to address disparities may not be simple, cheap, or timely. Solutions for addressing pulse oximetry accuracy disparities leveraging current technology may be necessary, and might also be better. Trial Registration: Pro00113724, exempt.