Twenty Years of Legal Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in the United States: Evidence Review and New Analyse.

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2024-09-25 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01
Benjamin R Karney, Melanie A Zaber, Molly G Smith, Samuel J Mann, Marwa AlFakhri, Jessie Coe, Jamie L Ryan, Catria Gadwah-Meaden, Christy Mallory, Brad Sears, Chandra Garber
{"title":"Twenty Years of Legal Marriage for Same-Sex Couples in the United States: Evidence Review and New Analyse.","authors":"Benjamin R Karney, Melanie A Zaber, Molly G Smith, Samuel J Mann, Marwa AlFakhri, Jessie Coe, Jamie L Ryan, Catria Gadwah-Meaden, Christy Mallory, Brad Sears, Chandra Garber","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty years ago, the United States was divided by heated debates over legalizing marriage for same-sex couples. Those in favor argued that granting same-sex couples access to marriage would strengthen commitment for same-sex couples, extend the financial benefits of marriage to same-sex households, and improve outcomes for children raised by same-sex parents. Those who were opposed argued that granting legal status to marriages between same-sex partners would alter the foundation of marriage and diminish its value for different-sex couples, ultimately harming children by making them less likely to be raised in stable, two-parent families. It has now been 20 years since Massachusetts became the first state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in May 2004. The consequences of extending legal recognition to same-sex couples need no longer be a topic of speculation and debate; researchers have had two decades to study the consequences of legalizing marriage for same-sex couples on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals; their children; and the general public. The broad goal of this study is to document those consequences. The authors pursued this goal in two ways. First, they conducted a comprehensive review of the existing research literature on the effects of legalizing marriage for same-sex couples. Second, they conducted new analyses to evaluate the prediction that rates of marriage, cohabitation, and divorce and attitudes toward marriage would be adversely affected by granting same-sex couples access to legal marriage.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"11 4","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Twenty years ago, the United States was divided by heated debates over legalizing marriage for same-sex couples. Those in favor argued that granting same-sex couples access to marriage would strengthen commitment for same-sex couples, extend the financial benefits of marriage to same-sex households, and improve outcomes for children raised by same-sex parents. Those who were opposed argued that granting legal status to marriages between same-sex partners would alter the foundation of marriage and diminish its value for different-sex couples, ultimately harming children by making them less likely to be raised in stable, two-parent families. It has now been 20 years since Massachusetts became the first state to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in May 2004. The consequences of extending legal recognition to same-sex couples need no longer be a topic of speculation and debate; researchers have had two decades to study the consequences of legalizing marriage for same-sex couples on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals; their children; and the general public. The broad goal of this study is to document those consequences. The authors pursued this goal in two ways. First, they conducted a comprehensive review of the existing research literature on the effects of legalizing marriage for same-sex couples. Second, they conducted new analyses to evaluate the prediction that rates of marriage, cohabitation, and divorce and attitudes toward marriage would be adversely affected by granting same-sex couples access to legal marriage.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国同性配偶合法婚姻二十年:证据回顾与新分析》。
二十年前,美国因关于同性伴侣婚姻合法化的激烈辩论而分裂。赞成者认为,给予同性伴侣婚姻机会将加强同性伴侣的承诺,将婚姻的经济利益扩大到同性家庭,并改善同性父母抚养子女的结果。反对者则认为,给予同性伴侣之间的婚姻合法地位将改变婚姻的基础,降低其对异性伴侣的价值,最终会使儿童更不可能在稳定的双亲家庭中长大,从而对儿童造成伤害。自 2004 年 5 月马萨诸塞州成为第一个向同性伴侣颁发结婚证的州以来,20 年过去了。研究人员已经用了二十年的时间来研究同性伴侣婚姻合法化对男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者(LGBT)个人、他们的子女以及公众的影响。本研究的总体目标是记录这些后果。作者通过两种方式来实现这一目标。首先,他们全面回顾了有关同性伴侣婚姻合法化影响的现有研究文献。其次,他们进行了新的分析,以评估同性伴侣获得合法婚姻会对结婚率、同居率和离婚率以及对婚姻的态度产生不利影响的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2023 National Survey of Health Attitudes: Description and Top-Line Summary Data. How Working Conditions in Civilian Jobs Can Affect Veterans' Health and Well-Being: Veterans' Issues in Focus. Lessons from 9/11 for Supporting Veterans Exposed to Military Environmental Hazards: Veterans' Issues in Focus. Letter from the Editor. Measuring Cognition in Clinical Trials in Parkinson's Disease, Dementia with Lewy Bodies, and Related Disorders: Roundtable Proceedings and Roadmap for Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1