Contraceptive use among transgender men and gender diverse individuals in the United States: reasons for use, non-use, and methods used for pregnancy prevention.

Juno Obedin-Maliver, Ava Snow, Sachiko Ragosta, Laura Fix, Jen Hastings, Micah E Lubensky, Matthew R Capriotti, Zubin Dastur, Annesa Flentje, Mitchell R Lunn, Heidi Moseson
{"title":"Contraceptive use among transgender men and gender diverse individuals in the United States: reasons for use, non-use, and methods used for pregnancy prevention.","authors":"Juno Obedin-Maliver, Ava Snow, Sachiko Ragosta, Laura Fix, Jen Hastings, Micah E Lubensky, Matthew R Capriotti, Zubin Dastur, Annesa Flentje, Mitchell R Lunn, Heidi Moseson","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe contraceptive use for pregnancy prevention among transgender men and gender diverse (TGD) individuals assigned female or intersex at birth (AFIAB) and explore whether contraceptive use differs by testosterone use.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We analyzed data from a cross-sectional, online survey of N=1,694 TGD individuals AFIAB recruited in 2019 through a community-facing website and a national community-engaged cohort study of sexual and/or gender minority (SGM) adults in the US. Descriptive and regression analyses characterized the current and ever use of contraceptive methods for pregnancy prevention, stratified by testosterone use, and described reasons for contraceptive use/non-use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents (71.0%) had used contraception before with 49.4% using it for pregnancy prevention. The methods for pregnancy prevention that were most frequently ever used for pregnancy prevention included: external condoms (91.8%), combined hormonal contraceptive pills (63.0%), and withdrawal (45.9%). The methods most frequently currently used for pregnancy prevention included: external condoms (35.4%), hormonal IUD (24.8%), and abstinence (19.2%). Some reported formerly (n=55, 6.6%) or currently (n=30, 3.6%) relying on testosterone for pregnancy prevention. Only 4 of the 33 reasons for contraceptive use and non-use differed by testosterone use group. The most reported reasons for never using contraception were not engaging in penis-in-vagina sex (5.7%) or no sex with individuals who produce sperm (4.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most TGD individuals AFIAB have used contraception, and almost half for pregnancy prevention. The most used methods require minimal and/or non-invasive healthcare system interaction. Some respondents relied on testosterone as birth control, despite a lack of efficacy evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To describe contraceptive use for pregnancy prevention among transgender men and gender diverse (TGD) individuals assigned female or intersex at birth (AFIAB) and explore whether contraceptive use differs by testosterone use.

Study design: We analyzed data from a cross-sectional, online survey of N=1,694 TGD individuals AFIAB recruited in 2019 through a community-facing website and a national community-engaged cohort study of sexual and/or gender minority (SGM) adults in the US. Descriptive and regression analyses characterized the current and ever use of contraceptive methods for pregnancy prevention, stratified by testosterone use, and described reasons for contraceptive use/non-use.

Results: Most respondents (71.0%) had used contraception before with 49.4% using it for pregnancy prevention. The methods for pregnancy prevention that were most frequently ever used for pregnancy prevention included: external condoms (91.8%), combined hormonal contraceptive pills (63.0%), and withdrawal (45.9%). The methods most frequently currently used for pregnancy prevention included: external condoms (35.4%), hormonal IUD (24.8%), and abstinence (19.2%). Some reported formerly (n=55, 6.6%) or currently (n=30, 3.6%) relying on testosterone for pregnancy prevention. Only 4 of the 33 reasons for contraceptive use and non-use differed by testosterone use group. The most reported reasons for never using contraception were not engaging in penis-in-vagina sex (5.7%) or no sex with individuals who produce sperm (4.8%).

Conclusions: Most TGD individuals AFIAB have used contraception, and almost half for pregnancy prevention. The most used methods require minimal and/or non-invasive healthcare system interaction. Some respondents relied on testosterone as birth control, despite a lack of efficacy evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国变性男性和不同性别者使用避孕药具的情况:使用、不使用的原因以及用于避孕的方法。
目的:描述变性男性和出生时被分配为女性或双性人(AFIAB)的变性人为避孕而使用避孕药具的情况,并探讨使用睾酮是否会导致避孕药具使用情况的不同:描述变性男性和性别多元化(TGD)个体(AFIAB)为避孕而使用避孕药具的情况,并探讨避孕药具的使用是否因睾酮的使用而有所不同:我们分析了一项横断面在线调查的数据,调查对象为 2019 年通过面向社区的网站招募的 N=1,694 名 AFIAB TGD 个人,以及一项针对美国性少数群体和/或性别少数群体 (SGM) 成年人的全国性社区参与队列研究。描述性分析和回归分析描述了目前和曾经使用避孕方法避孕的情况,按睾酮使用情况进行了分层,并描述了使用/不使用避孕方法的原因:大多数受访者(71.0%)以前使用过避孕药具,其中 49.4% 用于避孕。最常用的避孕方法包括:外用避孕套(91.8%)、复合激素避孕药(63.0%)和体外射精(45.9%)。目前最常用的避孕方法包括:外用避孕套(35.4%)、荷尔蒙宫内节育器(24.8%)和禁欲(19.2%)。有些人表示以前(55 人,6.6%)或现在(30 人,3.6%)依靠睾酮避孕。在 33 个使用和不使用避孕药具的原因中,只有 4 个原因因使用睾酮组别而异。报告最多的从未使用避孕药具的原因是不进行阴茎插入阴道的性行为(5.7%)或不与产生精子的个体发生性行为(4.8%):结论:大多数 AFIAB 同性恋者都采取过避孕措施,其中近一半是为了避孕。最常用的方法只需与医疗保健系统进行最少和/或非侵入性的互动。一些受访者依靠睾酮避孕,尽管缺乏有效性证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation. Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study. Ongoing contraceptive goals of patients who did not achieve desired postpartum permanent contraception prior to hospital discharge. The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study. Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1