Reliability of L-Dex Scores for Assessment of Unilateral Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

Leigh C Ward, Katrina Gaitatzis, Belinda Thompson, Vincent Singh Paramanandam, Louise A Koelmeyer
{"title":"Reliability of L-Dex Scores for Assessment of Unilateral Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.","authors":"Leigh C Ward, Katrina Gaitatzis, Belinda Thompson, Vincent Singh Paramanandam, Louise A Koelmeyer","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2024-5-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication of breast cancer treatment that may result in swelling of the affected arm due to compromised lymphatic function. Implementing a screening program and early intervention for BCRL are important for effective management. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a commonly used tool for assessing BCRL. This study aimed to compare different normative ranges for BIS L-Dex scores in the detection of BCRL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from 158 women with clinically ascribed and indocyanine green confirmed BCRL were analysed. BIS measurements were obtained using an ImpediMed standing device, and L-Dex scores were calculated using published normative ranges for healthy individuals. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the concordance between different reference ranges in classifying individuals with lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that L-Dex scores calculated using different normative ranges were highly correlated and essentially interchangeable in detecting BCRL. Approximately 90% of participants exceeded the L-Dex threshold for lymphedema, with minimal discrepancies between reference ranges. False negative rates were observed in some participants, likely due to early-stage BCRL with minimal lymph accumulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that BIS L-Dex scores are a valid indicator of BCRL, regardless of specific normative ranges used. Detection rates of clinically confirmed BCRL were consistent across different reference ranges, with minimal discrepancies. BIS remains a valuable tool for early detection and monitoring of BCRL. Future research should focus on longitudinal assessments and use of change in L-Dex scores for lymphedema monitoring and progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":"20 4","pages":"251-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2024-5-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common complication of breast cancer treatment that may result in swelling of the affected arm due to compromised lymphatic function. Implementing a screening program and early intervention for BCRL are important for effective management. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a commonly used tool for assessing BCRL. This study aimed to compare different normative ranges for BIS L-Dex scores in the detection of BCRL.

Materials and methods: Data from 158 women with clinically ascribed and indocyanine green confirmed BCRL were analysed. BIS measurements were obtained using an ImpediMed standing device, and L-Dex scores were calculated using published normative ranges for healthy individuals. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the concordance between different reference ranges in classifying individuals with lymphedema.

Results: The study found that L-Dex scores calculated using different normative ranges were highly correlated and essentially interchangeable in detecting BCRL. Approximately 90% of participants exceeded the L-Dex threshold for lymphedema, with minimal discrepancies between reference ranges. False negative rates were observed in some participants, likely due to early-stage BCRL with minimal lymph accumulation.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that BIS L-Dex scores are a valid indicator of BCRL, regardless of specific normative ranges used. Detection rates of clinically confirmed BCRL were consistent across different reference ranges, with minimal discrepancies. BIS remains a valuable tool for early detection and monitoring of BCRL. Future research should focus on longitudinal assessments and use of change in L-Dex scores for lymphedema monitoring and progression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估单侧乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的 L-Dex 评分的可靠性
目的:乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)是乳腺癌治疗过程中常见的并发症,可能会因淋巴功能受损而导致患臂肿胀。实施乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿筛查计划和早期干预对有效治疗非常重要。生物阻抗光谱仪(BIS)是评估 BCRL 的常用工具。本研究旨在比较 BIS L-Dex 评分在检测 BCRL 时的不同标准范围:分析了 158 名经临床诊断和吲哚青绿证实为 BCRL 的妇女的数据。使用 ImpediMed 站立设备进行 BIS 测量,并使用已公布的健康人常模范围计算 L-Dex 分数。研究人员进行了统计分析,以比较不同参考范围在对淋巴水肿患者进行分类时的一致性:研究发现,采用不同常模范围计算出的 L-Dex 分数在检测 BCRL 方面具有高度相关性和基本互换性。约 90% 的参与者超过了淋巴水肿的 L-Dex 临界值,参考范围之间的差异极小。一些参与者出现了假阴性率,这可能是由于早期BCRL淋巴积聚极少所致:结论:研究结果表明,无论使用何种标准范围,BIS L-Dex 评分都是 BCRL 的有效指标。临床确诊 BCRL 的检出率在不同参考范围内保持一致,差异极小。BIS 仍是早期检测和监测 BCRL 的重要工具。未来的研究重点应放在纵向评估以及利用 L-Dex 评分的变化来监测淋巴水肿的发生和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying the SOUND Trial for Omitting Axillary Surgery in Patients With Early Breast Cancer in Bahrain. Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Before and After Breast-Cancer Diagnosis Among Young Women in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966. Dietary Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk: A KCPS-II Cohort Study. Effect of Flaxseed on Pain Relief and Quality of Life in Patients With Mastalgia: A Single Arm Interventional Study. Mastalgia and Why It Should Be Evaluated With Imaging in Areas Where Use of Breast Cancer Screening Services are Unsatisfactory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1