Disability inclusion in national surveys.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-09-26 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae117
Caroline Cerilli, Varshini Varadaraj, Jennifer Choi, Fiona Sweeney, Franz Castro, Scott D Landes, Bonnielin K Swenor
{"title":"Disability inclusion in national surveys.","authors":"Caroline Cerilli, Varshini Varadaraj, Jennifer Choi, Fiona Sweeney, Franz Castro, Scott D Landes, Bonnielin K Swenor","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>National surveys are important for understanding the disparities that disabled people experience across social determinants of health; however, limited research has examined the methods used to include disabled people in these surveys. This study reviewed nationally representative surveys administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Census Bureau that collected data in the past 5 years and sampled adults ≥18 years. Data from both publicly available online survey documents and a questionnaire emailed to survey administrators were used to determine whether surveys (1) oversampled disabled people, (2) had a data-accessibility protocol to support data collection, and (3) provided multiple data-collection modalities (eg, phone, paper). Of the 201 surveys identified, 30 met the inclusion criteria for the study. Of these 30 surveys, 1 oversampled disabled people, none had a data-collection accessibility protocol, and 21 provided multiple data-collection modalities. This study highlights barriers and opportunities to including disabled people in national surveys, which is essential for ensuring survey data are generalizable to the US population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 9","pages":"qxae117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National surveys are important for understanding the disparities that disabled people experience across social determinants of health; however, limited research has examined the methods used to include disabled people in these surveys. This study reviewed nationally representative surveys administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Census Bureau that collected data in the past 5 years and sampled adults ≥18 years. Data from both publicly available online survey documents and a questionnaire emailed to survey administrators were used to determine whether surveys (1) oversampled disabled people, (2) had a data-accessibility protocol to support data collection, and (3) provided multiple data-collection modalities (eg, phone, paper). Of the 201 surveys identified, 30 met the inclusion criteria for the study. Of these 30 surveys, 1 oversampled disabled people, none had a data-collection accessibility protocol, and 21 provided multiple data-collection modalities. This study highlights barriers and opportunities to including disabled people in national surveys, which is essential for ensuring survey data are generalizable to the US population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将残疾问题纳入国家调查。
全国性调查对于了解残疾人在健康的社会决定因素方面所经历的差异非常重要;然而,对将残疾人纳入这些调查所使用的方法的研究却很有限。本研究回顾了由美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和美国人口普查局在过去 5 年中进行的具有全国代表性的调查,这些调查收集了数据,并对年龄≥18 岁的成年人进行了抽样调查。从公开的在线调查文件和通过电子邮件发送给调查管理员的调查问卷中获取的数据被用来确定调查是否(1)对残疾人进行了过度采样,(2)具有支持数据收集的数据无障碍协议,以及(3)提供了多种数据收集方式(如电话、纸质)。在确定的 201 份调查中,有 30 份符合研究的纳入标准。在这 30 项调查中,1 项调查对残疾人进行了超额采样,没有一项调查制定了数据收集无障碍协议,21 项调查提供了多种数据收集方式。本研究强调了在全国性调查中纳入残疾人的障碍和机遇,这对于确保调查数据在美国人口中的普遍性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Factors impacting vaccine uptake among adult Medicaid beneficiaries: a systematic literature review. Measuring hospital inpatient Procedure Access Inequality in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1