Return on investments in social determinants of health interventions: what is the evidence?

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-09-11 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae114
Sayeh Nikpay, Zhanji Zhang, Pinar Karaca-Mandic
{"title":"Return on investments in social determinants of health interventions: what is the evidence?","authors":"Sayeh Nikpay, Zhanji Zhang, Pinar Karaca-Mandic","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been an increasing recognition of the importance and the value of addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve population health outcomes, manage health care costs, and reduce health inequities. Despite the strong interest in investing in SDOH initiatives by various stakeholders, the literature on the return from such investments is scarce. The differences in study populations and methodologies, and the lack of data on SDOH intervention outcomes and/or costs, make it challenging to quantify and generalize outcomes for decision-making. We reviewed the literature on SDOH interventions focused on food and housing insecurity, and developed a methodology for estimating a key outcome: the return on investment (ROI), defined as the net returns from an intervention divided by its costs. The ROI estimates we report can be used by stakeholders to prioritize among alternative SDOH interventions for fundraising, investing, and implementing purposes. The average ROI for food-insecurity programs was 85% (ranging from 1% to 287%; except for 1 study's ROI, -31%) and for housing-insecurity programs was 50% (ranging from 5% to 224%; except for 1 ROI, -38%). In addition, these estimates can serve as key inputs for designing and employing innovative financing and policy solutions to increase the use of these interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 9","pages":"qxae114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11425055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been an increasing recognition of the importance and the value of addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) to improve population health outcomes, manage health care costs, and reduce health inequities. Despite the strong interest in investing in SDOH initiatives by various stakeholders, the literature on the return from such investments is scarce. The differences in study populations and methodologies, and the lack of data on SDOH intervention outcomes and/or costs, make it challenging to quantify and generalize outcomes for decision-making. We reviewed the literature on SDOH interventions focused on food and housing insecurity, and developed a methodology for estimating a key outcome: the return on investment (ROI), defined as the net returns from an intervention divided by its costs. The ROI estimates we report can be used by stakeholders to prioritize among alternative SDOH interventions for fundraising, investing, and implementing purposes. The average ROI for food-insecurity programs was 85% (ranging from 1% to 287%; except for 1 study's ROI, -31%) and for housing-insecurity programs was 50% (ranging from 5% to 224%; except for 1 ROI, -38%). In addition, these estimates can serve as key inputs for designing and employing innovative financing and policy solutions to increase the use of these interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康问题社会决定因素干预措施的投资回报:证据是什么?
越来越多的人认识到,解决健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)问题对于改善人口健康状况、控制医疗成本和减少健康不公平现象具有重要意义和价值。尽管各利益相关方对投资 SDOH 举措兴趣浓厚,但有关此类投资回报的文献却很少。研究人群和方法的差异,以及 SDOH 干预结果和/或成本数据的缺乏,使得量化和归纳决策结果具有挑战性。我们回顾了有关以食物和住房不安全为重点的 SDOH 干预措施的文献,并开发了一种估算关键成果的方法:投资回报率 (ROI),其定义为一项干预措施的净回报除以其成本。利益相关者可以利用我们报告的投资回报率估算结果,在可供选择的 SDOH 干预措施中确定优先次序,以达到筹资、投资和实施的目的。食品不安全项目的平均投资回报率为 85%(从 1%到 287%不等;只有一项研究的投资回报率为-31%),住房不安全项目的平均投资回报率为 50%(从 5%到 224%不等;只有一项研究的投资回报率为-38%)。此外,这些估算可作为设计和采用创新性融资和政策解决方案的关键投入,以增加这些干预措施的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Scenarios, not shortage forecasts, are key to better workforce policy. Factors impacting vaccine uptake among adult Medicaid beneficiaries: a systematic literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1