Multimodal image-guided surgical robot versus 3D-printed template for brachytherapy of malignant tumours in the skull base and deep facial region: a clinical comparative study
N. Jin , F. Meng , L. Zhu , L. Xing , Q. Lin , H. Zhang
{"title":"Multimodal image-guided surgical robot versus 3D-printed template for brachytherapy of malignant tumours in the skull base and deep facial region: a clinical comparative study","authors":"N. Jin , F. Meng , L. Zhu , L. Xing , Q. Lin , H. Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compared a multimodal image-guided robot and three-dimensionally (3D) printed templates for implanting iodine-125 (I<sup>125</sup>) radioactive seeds in patients with malignant tumours in the skull base and deep facial region. Seventeen patients who underwent I<sup>125</sup> radioactive seed implantation between December 2018 and December 2019 were included. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and accuracy of seed implantation were compared between the multimodal image-guided robot-assisted implantation (experimental) group (<em>n</em> = 7) and 3D-printed template-assisted implantation (control) group (<em>n</em> = 10). In total, 291 seeds were implanted in the experimental group and 436 in the control group; the mean error of seed implantation accuracy was 1.95 ± 0.13 mm and 1.90 ± 0.08 mm, respectively (<em>P</em> = 0.309). The preparation time was 26.13 ± 5.28 min in the experimental group and 0 min in the control group, while the average operation time was 34.44 ± 6.39 min versus 43.70 ± 6.06 min, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss was 4.96 ± 1.76 ml (experimental) versus 8.97 ± 2.99 ml (control) (<em>P</em> = 0.123). Multimodal image-guided robot-assisted I<sup>125</sup> radioactive seed implantation met the clinical requirements for treating malignant tumours in the skull base and deep facial regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14332,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"54 3","pages":"Pages 217-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502724003680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study compared a multimodal image-guided robot and three-dimensionally (3D) printed templates for implanting iodine-125 (I125) radioactive seeds in patients with malignant tumours in the skull base and deep facial region. Seventeen patients who underwent I125 radioactive seed implantation between December 2018 and December 2019 were included. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and accuracy of seed implantation were compared between the multimodal image-guided robot-assisted implantation (experimental) group (n = 7) and 3D-printed template-assisted implantation (control) group (n = 10). In total, 291 seeds were implanted in the experimental group and 436 in the control group; the mean error of seed implantation accuracy was 1.95 ± 0.13 mm and 1.90 ± 0.08 mm, respectively (P = 0.309). The preparation time was 26.13 ± 5.28 min in the experimental group and 0 min in the control group, while the average operation time was 34.44 ± 6.39 min versus 43.70 ± 6.06 min, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss was 4.96 ± 1.76 ml (experimental) versus 8.97 ± 2.99 ml (control) (P = 0.123). Multimodal image-guided robot-assisted I125 radioactive seed implantation met the clinical requirements for treating malignant tumours in the skull base and deep facial regions.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery is one of the leading journals in oral and maxillofacial surgery in the world. The Journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery and supporting specialties.
The Journal is divided into sections, ensuring every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is covered fully through a range of invited review articles, leading clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, case reports and others. The sections include:
• Congenital and craniofacial deformities
• Orthognathic Surgery/Aesthetic facial surgery
• Trauma
• TMJ disorders
• Head and neck oncology
• Reconstructive surgery
• Implantology/Dentoalveolar surgery
• Clinical Pathology
• Oral Medicine
• Research and emerging technologies.