Enhancing Removable Partial Dentures Hygiene: Investigating Mucolytic Agents and Biocides for Disrupting Biofilms and Improving Antimicrobial Efficacy.

Leonardo Guedes da Silva Moraes, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira, Ana Paula Macedo, Carolina Alves Freiria de Oliveira, Evandro Watanabe, Valéria Oliveira Pagnano
{"title":"Enhancing Removable Partial Dentures Hygiene: Investigating Mucolytic Agents and Biocides for Disrupting Biofilms and Improving Antimicrobial Efficacy.","authors":"Leonardo Guedes da Silva Moraes, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira, Ana Paula Macedo, Carolina Alves Freiria de Oliveira, Evandro Watanabe, Valéria Oliveira Pagnano","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the antibiofilm action of 2.5 mg/mL peracetic acid (PA), 0.5 mg/mL cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), and 160 mg/mL N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) against multispecies biofilm of Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata, developed on surfaces of heat-polymerizing acrylic resin (AR) and cobaltchromium (Co-Cr) alloy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multispecies biofilm was grown on the surface of AR and Co-Cr specimens (Ø 12×3mm). After biofilm maturation, the specimens were immersed in experimental solutions and evaluated through biofilm viability (CFU) (n&#61;9), biofilm metabolic activity (XTT) (n&#61;9), biofilm-covered areas (Live/Dead) (n&#61;2), effects on the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) (n&#61;2) and biofilm morphology (n&#61;1). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey post-test or Kruskal-Wallis followed by the Dunn post-test (α&#61;.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, all evaluated solutions impacted biofilm viability. PA presented wider activity by reducing CFU of all microorganisms on both surfaces, XTT (P<.001) and Live/Dead (P<.001). NAC had a notorious effect in reducing the viability of bacteria without affecting the yeasts. NAC reduced XTT on AR (P&#61;.006) and Co-Cr (P&#61;.003) but did not reduce the aggregated biofilm layer. CPC had distinct effect according to the surface, being most effective in reducing CFU on AR than the Co-Cr surface. However, it did not influence XTT, and the amount of residual aggregated biofilm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PA provided the greatest antibiofilm action, while CPC and NAC showed intermediate action. Nonetheless, no solution was able to completely remove the biofilm adhered to the surfaces of heat-polymerizing AR and Co-Cr alloy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the antibiofilm action of 2.5 mg/mL peracetic acid (PA), 0.5 mg/mL cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), and 160 mg/mL N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) against multispecies biofilm of Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata, developed on surfaces of heat-polymerizing acrylic resin (AR) and cobaltchromium (Co-Cr) alloy.

Materials and methods: A multispecies biofilm was grown on the surface of AR and Co-Cr specimens (Ø 12×3mm). After biofilm maturation, the specimens were immersed in experimental solutions and evaluated through biofilm viability (CFU) (n=9), biofilm metabolic activity (XTT) (n=9), biofilm-covered areas (Live/Dead) (n=2), effects on the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) (n=2) and biofilm morphology (n=1). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey post-test or Kruskal-Wallis followed by the Dunn post-test (α=.05).

Results: Overall, all evaluated solutions impacted biofilm viability. PA presented wider activity by reducing CFU of all microorganisms on both surfaces, XTT (P<.001) and Live/Dead (P<.001). NAC had a notorious effect in reducing the viability of bacteria without affecting the yeasts. NAC reduced XTT on AR (P=.006) and Co-Cr (P=.003) but did not reduce the aggregated biofilm layer. CPC had distinct effect according to the surface, being most effective in reducing CFU on AR than the Co-Cr surface. However, it did not influence XTT, and the amount of residual aggregated biofilm.

Conclusions: PA provided the greatest antibiofilm action, while CPC and NAC showed intermediate action. Nonetheless, no solution was able to completely remove the biofilm adhered to the surfaces of heat-polymerizing AR and Co-Cr alloy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强可摘局部义齿的卫生:研究用于破坏生物膜和提高抗菌效果的溶菌剂和杀菌剂。
目的:本研究评估了 2.5 mg/mL 过氧乙酸(PA)、0.5 毫克/毫升十六烷基氯化吡啶(CPC)和 160 毫克/毫升 N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)对变异链球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、白色念珠菌和白色念珠菌在热聚合丙烯酸树脂(AR)和钴铬合金(Co-Cr)表面形成的多菌种生物膜的抗生物膜作用:在丙烯酸树脂和钴铬合金试样(直径 12×3mm)表面生长多菌种生物膜。生物膜成熟后,将试样浸入实验溶液中,通过生物膜活力(CFU)(n=9)、生物膜代谢活性(XTT)(n=9)、生物膜覆盖面积(活/死)(n=2)、对胞外聚合物物质(EPS)的影响(n=2)和生物膜形态(n=1)进行评估。数据分析采用方差分析和 Tukey 后检验或 Kruskal-Wallis 后邓恩检验(α=.05):总体而言,所有评估的溶液都对生物膜的活力产生了影响。PA 具有更广泛的活性,能减少两种表面上所有微生物的 CFU,XTT(PConclusions):PA 的抗生物膜作用最大,而 CPC 和 NAC 的作用居中。不过,没有一种溶液能够完全清除附着在热聚合 AR 和 Co-Cr 合金表面的生物膜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IN VITRO SURVIVAL AND FRACTURE FORCE OF LITHIUM DISILICATE HYBRID ABUTMENT CROWNS. Influence of Implant ScanBody Material and Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions. A Cross-Sectional Study of Temporomandibular Disorders Among Postgraduate Students. Translucency Parameters and Masking Abilities of Monolithic CAD/CAM Ceramics. A Comparison of Occlusal Schemes with Condylar Inclination and Anterior Guidance in Dentate Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1