Retrospective cohort study of self-reported outcomes after unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction.

Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1080/01676830.2024.2404671
Jessica X L Li, Eve Slavich, Raymond Sacks, Minas Coroneo, Geoffrey Wilcsek
{"title":"Retrospective cohort study of self-reported outcomes after unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction.","authors":"Jessica X L Li, Eve Slavich, Raymond Sacks, Minas Coroneo, Geoffrey Wilcsek","doi":"10.1080/01676830.2024.2404671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to quantify the proportion of patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction who self-reported improved epiphora bilaterally following unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy and investigate predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of patients from an Australian lacrimal clinic was performed. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age, complained of bilateral epiphora, underwent unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy between 2012 and 2022 and followed-up. Outcome groups were created by grouping self-reported epiphora improvement levels for each eye. Two-sided confidence intervals were calculated for the proportion of participants in each outcome group. Ordinal elastic net regression identified clinical features associated with outcome groups and estimated their effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 243 patients, the median post-operative follow-up duration was 3 months. Fifty-eight percent (95% CI 52-64%, <i>n</i> = 141) reported significant improvement (≥50% ipsilateral and any contralateral improvement), 5% (95% CI 3-9%, <i>n</i> = 13) reported small improvement (<50% ipsilateral and any contralateral improvement) and 26% (95% CI 20-31%, <i>n</i> = 62) reported ipsilateral improvement only. Eleven percent had functional or anatomical failure. Older age (OR 1.01), contralateral nasolacrimal duct narrowing (OR 1.37), contralateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction (OR 0.93) and longer follow-up time (OR 0.85) predicted outcome groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After unilateral DCR, many patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction report an improvement of their symptoms bilaterally in the early postoperative period. Contralateral nasolacrimal system diagnosis, patient age and follow-up duration were associated with outcomes. Further study using validated epiphora assessment tools may quantify this observation, and we suggest a potential underlying mechanism of contralateral effects after unilateral treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2024.2404671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to quantify the proportion of patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction who self-reported improved epiphora bilaterally following unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy and investigate predictive factors.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients from an Australian lacrimal clinic was performed. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age, complained of bilateral epiphora, underwent unilateral dacryocystorhinostomy between 2012 and 2022 and followed-up. Outcome groups were created by grouping self-reported epiphora improvement levels for each eye. Two-sided confidence intervals were calculated for the proportion of participants in each outcome group. Ordinal elastic net regression identified clinical features associated with outcome groups and estimated their effect sizes.

Results: Of 243 patients, the median post-operative follow-up duration was 3 months. Fifty-eight percent (95% CI 52-64%, n = 141) reported significant improvement (≥50% ipsilateral and any contralateral improvement), 5% (95% CI 3-9%, n = 13) reported small improvement (<50% ipsilateral and any contralateral improvement) and 26% (95% CI 20-31%, n = 62) reported ipsilateral improvement only. Eleven percent had functional or anatomical failure. Older age (OR 1.01), contralateral nasolacrimal duct narrowing (OR 1.37), contralateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction (OR 0.93) and longer follow-up time (OR 0.85) predicted outcome groups.

Conclusions: After unilateral DCR, many patients with bilateral epiphora and suspected nasolacrimal obstruction report an improvement of their symptoms bilaterally in the early postoperative period. Contralateral nasolacrimal system diagnosis, patient age and follow-up duration were associated with outcomes. Further study using validated epiphora assessment tools may quantify this observation, and we suggest a potential underlying mechanism of contralateral effects after unilateral treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
对双侧外窥和疑似鼻泪管阻塞患者进行单侧泪囊鼻腔造口术后自我报告结果的回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在量化单侧泪囊鼻腔造口术后自我报告双侧外窥症状改善的双侧外窥疑似鼻泪管阻塞患者的比例,并调查预测因素:对澳大利亚一家泪道诊所的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。符合条件的患者至少年满 18 岁,主诉双侧泪囊炎,在 2012 年至 2022 年期间接受了单侧泪囊鼻腔造口术,并进行了随访。通过对每只眼睛自我报告的咽衄改善程度进行分组,得出结果分组。计算了每个结果组中参与者比例的双侧置信区间。正态弹性净回归确定了与结果组相关的临床特征,并估算了其效应大小:在 243 名患者中,术后随访时间的中位数为 3 个月。58%(95% CI 52-64%,n = 141)的患者有明显改善(同侧和对侧改善≥50%),5%(95% CI 3-9%,n = 13)的患者有轻微改善(n = 62)的患者仅同侧改善。11%的患者出现功能性或解剖学故障。年龄较大(OR 1.01)、对侧鼻泪管狭窄(OR 1.37)、对侧鼻泪管阻塞(OR 0.93)和随访时间较长(OR 0.85)均可预测结果分组:结论:单侧 DCR 术后,许多双侧外窥并疑似鼻泪管阻塞的患者在术后早期报告双侧症状有所改善。对侧鼻泪管系统诊断、患者年龄和随访时间与疗效有关。使用有效的外窥评估工具进行进一步研究可能会量化这一观察结果,我们还提出了单侧治疗后对侧效果的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1