Learning curves for adoption of robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review of safety, efficiency and clinical outcomes.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02100-8
Faith Hirri, Oliver J Pickering, Nicholas C Carter, Gijsbert I van Boxel, Philip H Pucher
{"title":"Learning curves for adoption of robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review of safety, efficiency and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Faith Hirri, Oliver J Pickering, Nicholas C Carter, Gijsbert I van Boxel, Philip H Pucher","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02100-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic bariatric surgery may overcome challenges associated with laparoscopy, potentially achieving technically superior results. This review aims to summarise current literature reporting on learning curves for surgeons newly adopting robotic bariatrics and implications for safety, efficiency and outcomes. A systematic review was performed in line with the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases PubMed and MEDLINE were searched and articles reporting on learning curves in robotic bariatric surgery were identified. Studies that reported changes in outcome over time, or learning curves for surgeons newly adopting robotic bariatric surgery were included in this review. Eleven studies reporting on 1237 patients were included in this review. Most surgeons reported prior bariatric surgical experience. Differences were noted regarding the approach and adoption of robotics. Ten studies found significant reduction in operative time, with the shortest learning curve of 11 cases. Reporting of clinical outcomes was limited. Three studies reported statistically significant improvement in outcomes after the learning curve. Long-term outcomes were in line with current literature, though none assessed differences between learning curve groups. Reported learning curves in robotic bariatric surgery is variable, with limited reporting of clinical outcomes. With appropriate mentorship, surgeons can improve efficiency, safety and clinical outcomes, maximising the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02100-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic bariatric surgery may overcome challenges associated with laparoscopy, potentially achieving technically superior results. This review aims to summarise current literature reporting on learning curves for surgeons newly adopting robotic bariatrics and implications for safety, efficiency and outcomes. A systematic review was performed in line with the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases PubMed and MEDLINE were searched and articles reporting on learning curves in robotic bariatric surgery were identified. Studies that reported changes in outcome over time, or learning curves for surgeons newly adopting robotic bariatric surgery were included in this review. Eleven studies reporting on 1237 patients were included in this review. Most surgeons reported prior bariatric surgical experience. Differences were noted regarding the approach and adoption of robotics. Ten studies found significant reduction in operative time, with the shortest learning curve of 11 cases. Reporting of clinical outcomes was limited. Three studies reported statistically significant improvement in outcomes after the learning curve. Long-term outcomes were in line with current literature, though none assessed differences between learning curve groups. Reported learning curves in robotic bariatric surgery is variable, with limited reporting of clinical outcomes. With appropriate mentorship, surgeons can improve efficiency, safety and clinical outcomes, maximising the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用机器人减肥手术的学习曲线:安全性、效率和临床结果的系统性回顾。
机器人减肥手术可以克服与腹腔镜手术相关的挑战,可能在技术上取得更好的效果。本综述旨在总结目前有关新采用机器人减肥手术的外科医生学习曲线的文献,以及对安全性、效率和效果的影响。根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性综述。对电子数据库 PubMed 和 MEDLINE 进行了检索,确定了报道机器人减肥手术学习曲线的文章。报道随时间推移结果变化或新采用机器人减肥手术的外科医生的学习曲线的研究被纳入本次综述。本综述共纳入了 11 项研究,报告了 1237 名患者的情况。大多数外科医生都报告了之前的减肥手术经验。在采用机器人技术的方式和方法上存在差异。十项研究发现手术时间明显缩短,其中学习曲线最短的有11例。对临床结果的报告有限。三项研究报告称,学习曲线结束后,手术效果在统计学上有明显改善。尽管没有一项研究评估了学习曲线组之间的差异,但长期疗效与现有文献一致。关于机器人减肥手术学习曲线的报道各不相同,临床结果的报道也很有限。通过适当的指导,外科医生可以提高效率、安全性和临床效果,最大限度地发挥微创手术的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
A review of enhanced recovery after surgery concept in perioperative radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Patient reported health related quality of life outcomes after viable cryopreserved umbilical tissue placement directly over spared neurovascular bundles after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy. Comparative perioperative outcomes of intravenous indocyanine green during robot-assisted cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and bothersome LUTS-a retrospective cohort study. Correction: Body mass index influence on short-term perioperative results in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1