Sexual choking/strangulation and its association with condom and contraceptive use: Findings from a survey of students at a university in the Midwestern United States.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1111/psrh.12285
Debby Herbenick, Tsung-Chieh Fu, Callie Patterson Perry, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Heather Eastman-Mueller, Dubravka Svetina Valdivia
{"title":"Sexual choking/strangulation and its association with condom and contraceptive use: Findings from a survey of students at a university in the Midwestern United States.","authors":"Debby Herbenick, Tsung-Chieh Fu, Callie Patterson Perry, Lucia Guerra-Reyes, Heather Eastman-Mueller, Dubravka Svetina Valdivia","doi":"10.1111/psrh.12285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Consensual sexual choking has become prevalent among young United States (US) adults. In sex between women and men, women are overwhelmingly the ones choked, perhaps reproducing traditional heteronormative power dynamics. No research has examined the relationship between being choked during consensual sex and the use of external condoms and other contraceptives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a cross-sectional campus-representative survey to 4989 undergraduate students at a large public Midwestern US university.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half of respondents (n = 1803) had ever been choked during sex. Having been choked was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of event-level condom use (OR = 0.32 [0.19, 0.54] for >5 times lifetime choking among men and OR = 0.35 [0.27, 0.45] for >5 times lifetime choking among women compared to those with no choking experiences) and in the past 6 months (OR = 0.42 [0.24, 0.72] for >5 times lifetime choking among men and OR = 0.59 [0.43, 0.81] for >5 times lifetime choking among women compared to those with no choking experiences). Also, having ever been choked was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of having used an implant/intra-uterine device in the past 6 months (OR = 1.85 [1.28, 2.68] for >5 times lifetime choking compared to those with no choking experiences).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recognition that sexual choking is prevalent among young people has only recently emerged and educational programs are lacking. Study findings could be used to engage people in discussions about choking in relation to gender, power, and reproductive health agency.</p>","PeriodicalId":47632,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psrh.12285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Consensual sexual choking has become prevalent among young United States (US) adults. In sex between women and men, women are overwhelmingly the ones choked, perhaps reproducing traditional heteronormative power dynamics. No research has examined the relationship between being choked during consensual sex and the use of external condoms and other contraceptives.

Methods: We administered a cross-sectional campus-representative survey to 4989 undergraduate students at a large public Midwestern US university.

Results: Half of respondents (n = 1803) had ever been choked during sex. Having been choked was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of event-level condom use (OR = 0.32 [0.19, 0.54] for >5 times lifetime choking among men and OR = 0.35 [0.27, 0.45] for >5 times lifetime choking among women compared to those with no choking experiences) and in the past 6 months (OR = 0.42 [0.24, 0.72] for >5 times lifetime choking among men and OR = 0.59 [0.43, 0.81] for >5 times lifetime choking among women compared to those with no choking experiences). Also, having ever been choked was associated with a significantly greater likelihood of having used an implant/intra-uterine device in the past 6 months (OR = 1.85 [1.28, 2.68] for >5 times lifetime choking compared to those with no choking experiences).

Conclusion: Recognition that sexual choking is prevalent among young people has only recently emerged and educational programs are lacking. Study findings could be used to engage people in discussions about choking in relation to gender, power, and reproductive health agency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性窒息/窒息及其与安全套和避孕药具使用的关系:美国中西部一所大学学生的调查结果。
简介双方自愿的性窒息行为在美国成年人中非常普遍。在男女之间的性行为中,绝大多数情况下都是女性被掐住脖子,这或许是传统异性恋权力动态的再现。目前还没有研究探讨在双方自愿的性行为中被掐住脖子与使用外用避孕套和其他避孕药具之间的关系:我们对美国中西部一所大型公立大学的 4989 名本科生进行了校园代表性横向调查:半数受访者(n = 1803)曾在性生活中被掐过脖子。曾被掐过脖子与在事件中使用安全套的可能性显著降低有关(男性一生中被掐5次以上的OR = 0.32 [0.19, 0.54],一生中被掐5次以上的OR = 0.35 [0.27, 0.45])。与没有窒息经历的人相比,在过去 6 个月中,男性一生中窒息次数超过 5 次的 OR = 0.42 [0.24, 0.72],女性一生中窒息次数超过 5 次的 OR = 0.59 [0.43, 0.81])。此外,与无窒息经历者相比,在过去 6 个月中使用过植入式/宫内节育器的可能性明显更高(一生中窒息超过 5 次的 OR = 1.85 [1.28, 2.68]):结论:人们最近才认识到性窒息在年轻人中很普遍,并且缺乏教育计划。研究结果可用于让人们讨论与性别、权力和生殖健康机构有关的窒息问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health provides the latest peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other developed countries. For more than four decades, Perspectives has offered unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another; how they are affected by policies and programs; and their implications for individuals and societies. Published four times a year, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health includes original research, special reports and commentaries on the latest developments in the field of sexual and reproductive health, as well as staff-written summaries of recent findings in the field.
期刊最新文献
Estimating the economic impact of restricting reproductive healthcare access in Ohio. "Trust Women": Characteristics of and learnings from patients of a Shield Law medication abortion practice in the United States. Sexual choking/strangulation and its association with condom and contraceptive use: Findings from a survey of students at a university in the Midwestern United States. Understanding abortion legality and trimester of abortion care in Ohio, West Virginia and Kentucky, three abortion‐restrictive states Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1