Hyperemic vs non-hyperemic indexes discordance: Role of epicardial and microvascular resistance (HyperDisco Study).

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.004
A Di Molfetta, V Cusimano, M Cesario, P Mollo, G Di Ruzza, M Menichelli
{"title":"Hyperemic vs non-hyperemic indexes discordance: Role of epicardial and microvascular resistance (HyperDisco Study).","authors":"A Di Molfetta, V Cusimano, M Cesario, P Mollo, G Di Ruzza, M Menichelli","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Literature reports a 20 % discordance between hyperemic (FFR) and non-hyperemic indexes (NHi) of coronary stenosis lesions. This work aims to develop and test clinically, a formula relating FFR and NHi (including iFR, RFR and Pd/Pa) to study their discordance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-center, clinical study enrolling all patients undergoing full coronary physiology assessment with Coroventis CoroFlow Cardiovascular System (Abbott Vascular, St. Paul, Minnesota) to validate the developed formula: [Formula: see text] where IMR(BMR) is the hyperemic (basal) microvascular resistance and HSR(BSR) is the hyperemic (basal) stenosis resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 patients were enrolled, 72 % male, average age 67.4 ± 8.9. Mean hemodynamic data were: FFR 0.87 ± 0.07, iFR 0.93 ± 0.05, RFR 0.91 ± 0.05, Pd/Pa 0.92 ± 0.05, BMR 76.6 ± 51.6 mmHg*s, IMR 28.4 ± 22.8 mmHg*s, BSR 5.5 ± 4.7 mmHg, HSR 3.8 ± 2.9 mmHg*s, coronary flow reserve (CFR) 2.9 ± 1.6, resistive reserve ratio (RRR) 3.3 ± 2.0. Lin's Concordance and Bland Altman analysis showed an optimal correlation between measured and estimated data. Sensitivity analysis showed that: (1) FFR can underestimate epicardial stenosis severity leading to FFR- vs NHi + discordance in case of elevated IMR, (2) NHi can overestimate epicardial stenosis severity leading to FFR- vs NHi + in the case of low BMR, (3) if BSR > HSR, FFR- vs NHi + discordance can occur, while if BSR < HSR, FFR+ vs NHi- discordance can occur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>(1) NHi can be more reliable in case of elevated IMR; (2) FFR-CFR combination can be more reliable for low BMR occurring to compensate an epicardial stenosis; (3) NHi-CFR combination can be more reliable when BSR > HSR, while FFR-CFR combination can be more reliable when BSR < HSR. The combination between pressure and flow indexes (FFR-CFR or NHi-CFR) is more reliable when compensatory mechanisms occur.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.09.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Literature reports a 20 % discordance between hyperemic (FFR) and non-hyperemic indexes (NHi) of coronary stenosis lesions. This work aims to develop and test clinically, a formula relating FFR and NHi (including iFR, RFR and Pd/Pa) to study their discordance.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, clinical study enrolling all patients undergoing full coronary physiology assessment with Coroventis CoroFlow Cardiovascular System (Abbott Vascular, St. Paul, Minnesota) to validate the developed formula: [Formula: see text] where IMR(BMR) is the hyperemic (basal) microvascular resistance and HSR(BSR) is the hyperemic (basal) stenosis resistance.

Results: A total of 51 patients were enrolled, 72 % male, average age 67.4 ± 8.9. Mean hemodynamic data were: FFR 0.87 ± 0.07, iFR 0.93 ± 0.05, RFR 0.91 ± 0.05, Pd/Pa 0.92 ± 0.05, BMR 76.6 ± 51.6 mmHg*s, IMR 28.4 ± 22.8 mmHg*s, BSR 5.5 ± 4.7 mmHg, HSR 3.8 ± 2.9 mmHg*s, coronary flow reserve (CFR) 2.9 ± 1.6, resistive reserve ratio (RRR) 3.3 ± 2.0. Lin's Concordance and Bland Altman analysis showed an optimal correlation between measured and estimated data. Sensitivity analysis showed that: (1) FFR can underestimate epicardial stenosis severity leading to FFR- vs NHi + discordance in case of elevated IMR, (2) NHi can overestimate epicardial stenosis severity leading to FFR- vs NHi + in the case of low BMR, (3) if BSR > HSR, FFR- vs NHi + discordance can occur, while if BSR < HSR, FFR+ vs NHi- discordance can occur.

Conclusion: (1) NHi can be more reliable in case of elevated IMR; (2) FFR-CFR combination can be more reliable for low BMR occurring to compensate an epicardial stenosis; (3) NHi-CFR combination can be more reliable when BSR > HSR, while FFR-CFR combination can be more reliable when BSR < HSR. The combination between pressure and flow indexes (FFR-CFR or NHi-CFR) is more reliable when compensatory mechanisms occur.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高血压与非高血压指数不一致:心外膜和微血管阻力的作用(HyperDisco 研究)。
背景:文献报道冠状动脉狭窄病变的充盈指数(FFR)和非充盈指数(NHi)之间存在20%的不一致。这项工作的目的是开发并临床测试一个与 FFR 和 NHi(包括 iFR、RFR 和 Pd/Pa)相关的公式,以研究它们之间的不一致性:我们进行了一项前瞻性、单中心临床研究,纳入了所有使用 Coroventis CoroFlow 心血管系统(明尼苏达州圣保罗市雅培血管公司)进行全面冠状动脉生理评估的患者,以验证所开发的公式:[公式:见正文],其中 IMR(BMR) 为充盈(基础)微血管阻力,HSR(BSR) 为充盈(基础)狭窄阻力:共有 51 名患者入选,其中 72% 为男性,平均年龄(67.4 ± 8.9)岁。平均血液动力学数据为FFR 0.87 ± 0.07,iFR 0.93 ± 0.05,RFR 0.91 ± 0.05,Pd/Pa 0.92 ± 0.05,BMR 76.6 ± 51.6 mmHg*s,IMR 28.4 ± 22.8 mmHg*s,BSR 5.5 ± 4.7 mmHg,HSR 3.8 ± 2.9 mmHg*s,冠状动脉血流储备(CFR) 2.9 ± 1.6,阻力储备比(RRR) 3.3 ± 2.0。Lin's Concordance 和 Bland Altman 分析表明,测量数据和估计数据之间具有最佳相关性。敏感性分析表明(1) 在 IMR 升高的情况下,FFR 可低估心外膜狭窄的严重程度,导致 FFR- vs NHi + 不一致;(2) 在 BMR 低的情况下,NHi 可高估心外膜狭窄的严重程度,导致 FFR- vs NHi + 不一致;(3) 如果 BSR > HSR,则 FFR- vs NHi + 不一致可能发生,而如果 BSR 结论为:(1) NHi 可高估心外膜狭窄的严重程度,导致 FFR- vs NHi + 不一致;(2) 如果 BSR > HSR,则 FFR- vs NHi + 不一致可能发生:(1)在 IMR 升高的情况下,NHi 更为可靠;(2)在补偿心外膜狭窄而出现低 BMR 的情况下,FFR-CFR 组合更可靠;(3)当 BSR > HSR 时,NHi-CFR 组合更可靠,而当 BSR > HSR 时,FFR-CFR 组合更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
期刊最新文献
Gender disparity in morbidity and mortality among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection complicated by cardiogenic shock. The recruitment of Andreas Gruentzig. Association of revascularization with risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with chronic total occlusion of coronary arteries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Inconsistencies with reported point estimates and adjusted odds ratios. Effect of cardiac amyloidosis on outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1