Improving ICD Coding in the Emergency Department: Factors Related to Use of "Unspecified" Codes for Head and Brain Injury.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Management and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000002012
Tracy Wharton, Emily Hunt Costello, Alexis Peterson, Julia A Bleser, Kelly Sarmiento, Morgan Bailey
{"title":"Improving ICD Coding in the Emergency Department: Factors Related to Use of \"Unspecified\" Codes for Head and Brain Injury.","authors":"Tracy Wharton, Emily Hunt Costello, Alexis Peterson, Julia A Bleser, Kelly Sarmiento, Morgan Bailey","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are used for billing but also for surveillance for injuries such as traumatic brain injuries (TBI). While specificity is possible in the ICD-10-CM scheme, use of the code for unspecified injury of head (SO9.9) remains high.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This process evaluation sought to understand medical ICD-10-CM coding behaviors for TBI in emergency department (ED) settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Semi-structured interviews explored the processes that facilitate or hinder ED physicians from selecting specific ICD codes for TBI and potential points of intervention for increased coding specificity and reducing the use of unspecified codes.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Video interviews were conducted with a nationwide sample in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A purposive snowball sampling strategy was used to recruit 26 ED physicians with experience diagnosing TBI.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Semi-structured interviews identified factors related to the selection of specific ICD codes for head injury.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Thematic analysis of transcribed data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes emerged from the data: the impact of training and expertise, factors related to diagnosis, unclear connections with medical coders, and actionable recommendations. Interviews underscored the context surrounding \"unspecified\" codes for TBI, including demands from patient care, time pressures, issues around how a diagnosis may impact patient management decisions, and considerations related to mapping within the electronic medical record (EMR) where options may default to an unspecified code.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from this analysis indicate that ED providers may benefit from more robust training on how documentation can better support ICD-10-CM coding for this type of trauma. Revised EMR structures could support efficient coding specificity and clarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are used for billing but also for surveillance for injuries such as traumatic brain injuries (TBI). While specificity is possible in the ICD-10-CM scheme, use of the code for unspecified injury of head (SO9.9) remains high.

Objectives: This process evaluation sought to understand medical ICD-10-CM coding behaviors for TBI in emergency department (ED) settings.

Design: Semi-structured interviews explored the processes that facilitate or hinder ED physicians from selecting specific ICD codes for TBI and potential points of intervention for increased coding specificity and reducing the use of unspecified codes.

Setting: Video interviews were conducted with a nationwide sample in the United States.

Participants: A purposive snowball sampling strategy was used to recruit 26 ED physicians with experience diagnosing TBI.

Intervention: Semi-structured interviews identified factors related to the selection of specific ICD codes for head injury.

Main outcome measure: Thematic analysis of transcribed data.

Results: Four main themes emerged from the data: the impact of training and expertise, factors related to diagnosis, unclear connections with medical coders, and actionable recommendations. Interviews underscored the context surrounding "unspecified" codes for TBI, including demands from patient care, time pressures, issues around how a diagnosis may impact patient management decisions, and considerations related to mapping within the electronic medical record (EMR) where options may default to an unspecified code.

Conclusions: Findings from this analysis indicate that ED providers may benefit from more robust training on how documentation can better support ICD-10-CM coding for this type of trauma. Revised EMR structures could support efficient coding specificity and clarity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善急诊科的 ICD 编码:与头部和脑部损伤使用 "不明 "代码相关的因素。
背景:国际疾病分类(ICD)代码不仅用于计费,还用于监测创伤性脑损伤(TBI)等损伤。虽然 ICD-10-CM 方案可以实现特异性,但头部不明损伤代码(SO9.9)的使用率仍然很高:本过程评估旨在了解急诊科(ED)中 TBI 的 ICD-10-CM 医疗编码行为:设计:半结构式访谈探讨了促进或阻碍急诊科医生为创伤性脑损伤选择特定 ICD 编码的过程,以及提高编码特异性和减少使用未指定编码的潜在干预点:对美国全国范围内的样本进行了视频访谈:采用有目的的 "滚雪球 "抽样策略,招募了 26 名具有 TBI 诊断经验的急诊科医生:主要结果测量:对转录数据进行主题分析:结果:从数据中发现了四个主题:培训和专业知识的影响、与诊断相关的因素、与医疗编码员的联系不明确以及可操作的建议。访谈强调了围绕创伤性脑损伤 "未指定 "代码的背景,包括患者护理需求、时间压力、诊断如何影响患者管理决策的相关问题,以及与电子病历(EMR)内映射相关的考虑因素,其中选项可能默认为未指定代码:分析结果表明,急诊室医疗服务提供者可能会受益于更有力的培训,了解如何通过文档记录更好地支持这类创伤的 ICD-10-CM 编码。修订后的 EMR 结构可支持高效的编码特异性和清晰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Criticality and Frequency of Tasks by the Public Health Workforce, 2022. Real-Time Dashboard for Identifying Overdose Touchpoints in Indiana. Assessing Facility Readiness to Provide Equitable Birthing Care in New York State: A Baseline Survey. Training the Next Generation of Local Public Health Leaders: A Case Study of Community Health Organizers in Pennsylvania. Maintaining and Improving Virtual Call Centers for Public Health: The CUNY Recovery Corps Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1