Evaluating the Let's Move It intervention programme theory for adolescents' physical activity: Theorized psychosocial mechanisms of behavioural changes.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12744
Minttu Palsola, Vera Araújo-Soares, Wendy Hardeman, Ari Haukkala, Matti Toivo Juhani Heino, Falko Sniehotta, Reijo Sund, Tommi Vasankari, Nelli Hankonen
{"title":"Evaluating the Let's Move It intervention programme theory for adolescents' physical activity: Theorized psychosocial mechanisms of behavioural changes.","authors":"Minttu Palsola, Vera Araújo-Soares, Wendy Hardeman, Ari Haukkala, Matti Toivo Juhani Heino, Falko Sniehotta, Reijo Sund, Tommi Vasankari, Nelli Hankonen","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Behaviour change theories have extensively been used in health behaviour change interventions and their programme theories. However, they are rarely evaluated in randomized field studies. The Let's Move It intervention targeted various psychosocial constructs to increase adolescents' physical activity. A theory-based process evaluation aiming to illuminate the trial findings as well as to test the programme theory used is conducted. Specifically, we investigate whether the intervention influenced the theorized determinants of change immediately post-intervention and after 1 year, and whether these determinants were associated with changes in physical activity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cluster-randomized controlled trial (n = 1166).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured theorized determinants with self-report, and physical activity (PA) with accelerometry and self-report. The effects are evaluated with repeated measures ANOVA and regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No changes were detected in most theorized determinants but intervention arm reported higher enactment of behaviour change techniques used during intervention immediately post-intervention and lower descriptive norms for PA throughout. Autonomous motivation was associated with PA immediately post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of intervention effects may be due to many factors, for example insensitive measures, ceiling effects. However, reporting these null effects advances understanding of behaviour change processes. We introduce methodologic possibilities for future intervention programme theory evaluation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12744","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Behaviour change theories have extensively been used in health behaviour change interventions and their programme theories. However, they are rarely evaluated in randomized field studies. The Let's Move It intervention targeted various psychosocial constructs to increase adolescents' physical activity. A theory-based process evaluation aiming to illuminate the trial findings as well as to test the programme theory used is conducted. Specifically, we investigate whether the intervention influenced the theorized determinants of change immediately post-intervention and after 1 year, and whether these determinants were associated with changes in physical activity.

Design: A cluster-randomized controlled trial (n = 1166).

Methods: We measured theorized determinants with self-report, and physical activity (PA) with accelerometry and self-report. The effects are evaluated with repeated measures ANOVA and regression models.

Results: No changes were detected in most theorized determinants but intervention arm reported higher enactment of behaviour change techniques used during intervention immediately post-intervention and lower descriptive norms for PA throughout. Autonomous motivation was associated with PA immediately post-intervention.

Conclusions: The lack of intervention effects may be due to many factors, for example insensitive measures, ceiling effects. However, reporting these null effects advances understanding of behaviour change processes. We introduce methodologic possibilities for future intervention programme theory evaluation efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 "让我们动起来 "青少年体育活动干预计划理论:行为改变的社会心理机制理论。
目的:行为改变理论已广泛应用于健康行为改变干预措施及其方案理论中。然而,这些理论很少在随机实地研究中得到评估。让我们行动起来 "干预措施针对各种社会心理因素,以增加青少年的体育锻炼。我们开展了一项基于理论的过程评估,旨在阐明试验结果并检验所使用的计划理论。具体来说,我们调查了干预是否影响了干预后即刻和一年后理论上的变化决定因素,以及这些决定因素是否与体育锻炼的变化有关:设计:分组随机对照试验(n = 1166):方法:我们通过自我报告来测量理论上的决定因素,通过加速度计和自我报告来测量体力活动(PA)。采用重复测量方差分析和回归模型对效果进行评估:结果:大多数理论上的决定因素没有发生变化,但干预组在干预后立即报告了干预期间使用的行为改变技术的更高实施率,以及整个干预期间较低的体力活动描述性标准。自主动机与干预后的运动量相关:结论:干预效果不明显可能是由多种因素造成的,如测量不敏感、天花板效应等。然而,报告这些无效效果有助于加深对行为改变过程的理解。我们为未来的干预计划理论评估工作介绍了方法上的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
期刊最新文献
Personalized interventions for behaviour change: A scoping review of just-in-time adaptive interventions. Issue Information Determinants of child body weight categorization in parents and health care professionals: An experimental study. Online support groups for family caregivers: A qualitative exploration of social support and engagement. Self-compassion and psychological distress in chronic illness: A meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1