Feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth, individually-tailored healthy lifestyle intervention for adolescent and young adult pediatric cancer survivors.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Pediatric Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1093/jpepsy/jsae082
Melissa A Faith, Allison Schimmel-Bristow, Dianna M Boone, Julia D Johnston, Elizabeth Henschen, Lynda Beaupin, Sarah Sobalvarro
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth, individually-tailored healthy lifestyle intervention for adolescent and young adult pediatric cancer survivors.","authors":"Melissa A Faith, Allison Schimmel-Bristow, Dianna M Boone, Julia D Johnston, Elizabeth Henschen, Lynda Beaupin, Sarah Sobalvarro","doi":"10.1093/jpepsy/jsae082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poor nutrition and physical activity pose negative health risks for adolescent and young adult pediatric cancer survivors (AYACS). Our pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth intervention (ENHANCE) supporting AYACS' nutrition and physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized 58 AYACS and their adult care partner, when applicable, to the ENHANCE or control condition. Inclusion required an age of 15-25 years, previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and no eating disorder history. We utilized a 2:1 (ENHANCE [n = 35]: control [n = 23]) double-blind block randomization protocol in blocks of 6. ENHANCE comprised 12 (60-min) sessions that included education, skill-building, and values-based healthy lifestyle decision-making. The first five sessions included motivational interviewing and the final seven sessions included problem-solving training/goal setting. We evaluated feasibility based on eligibility, enrollment, attrition, and study completion percentages. We assessed fidelity using the Session Content-Fidelity Rating Tool and the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Coding form. We assessed acceptability using the Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile, the Revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire, and participants' exit interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ENHANCE was feasible and highly acceptable; all but one participant who started the intervention completed all 12 sessions and all participants reported enjoying the intervention via objective assessment and during exit interviews. Interventionists delivered ENHANCE with high fidelity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ENHANCE was highly acceptable among AYACS and care partners. The telehealth study design was feasible, suggesting benefits and feasibility of a future, larger, multisite RCT. Promising findings support our methodological decisions as important considerations to inform a larger RCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":48372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsae082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Poor nutrition and physical activity pose negative health risks for adolescent and young adult pediatric cancer survivors (AYACS). Our pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth intervention (ENHANCE) supporting AYACS' nutrition and physical activity.

Methods: We randomized 58 AYACS and their adult care partner, when applicable, to the ENHANCE or control condition. Inclusion required an age of 15-25 years, previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and no eating disorder history. We utilized a 2:1 (ENHANCE [n = 35]: control [n = 23]) double-blind block randomization protocol in blocks of 6. ENHANCE comprised 12 (60-min) sessions that included education, skill-building, and values-based healthy lifestyle decision-making. The first five sessions included motivational interviewing and the final seven sessions included problem-solving training/goal setting. We evaluated feasibility based on eligibility, enrollment, attrition, and study completion percentages. We assessed fidelity using the Session Content-Fidelity Rating Tool and the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Coding form. We assessed acceptability using the Abbreviated Acceptability Rating Profile, the Revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire, and participants' exit interviews.

Results: ENHANCE was feasible and highly acceptable; all but one participant who started the intervention completed all 12 sessions and all participants reported enjoying the intervention via objective assessment and during exit interviews. Interventionists delivered ENHANCE with high fidelity.

Conclusions: ENHANCE was highly acceptable among AYACS and care partners. The telehealth study design was feasible, suggesting benefits and feasibility of a future, larger, multisite RCT. Promising findings support our methodological decisions as important considerations to inform a larger RCT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对青少年和年轻成人儿科癌症幸存者的远程医疗、个人定制健康生活方式干预的可行性和可接受性。
目的:营养不良和体力活动不足对青少年和年轻成人儿科癌症幸存者(AYACS)的健康构成了负面风险。我们的试点随机对照试验(RCT)评估了远程医疗干预(ENHANCE)的可行性和可接受性,以支持 AYACS 的营养和体育锻炼:我们将 58 名青少年健康顾问及其成年护理伙伴(如适用)随机分配到 ENHANCE 或对照组。入组要求年龄在 15-25 岁之间,曾接受过化疗或放疗,且无饮食失调病史。我们采用了2:1(ENHANCE [n = 35]:对照组 [n = 23])的双盲随机分组方案,每组6人。ENHANCE由12节(60分钟)课程组成,包括教育、技能培养和基于价值观的健康生活方式决策。前五个疗程包括动机访谈,最后七个疗程包括问题解决培训/目标设定。我们根据资格、入学率、自然减员率和研究完成率评估了可行性。我们使用 "疗程内容-忠实度评级工具 "和 "动机访谈治疗完整性编码表 "对忠实度进行了评估。我们使用简短可接受性评分表、修订版帮助联盟问卷和参与者退出访谈来评估可接受性:结果:ENHANCE 是可行的,可接受性很高;除一名参与者外,所有开始干预的参与者都完成了全部 12 个疗程,所有参与者都通过客观评估和退出访谈表示喜欢干预。干预人员对 ENHANCE 的实施非常忠实:ENHANCE在AYACS和护理伙伴中的接受度很高。远程医疗研究设计是可行的,这表明未来进行更大规模、多地点的 RCT 是有益和可行的。有希望的研究结果支持我们的方法决定,这是为更大规模的 RCT 提供信息的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Psychology
Journal of Pediatric Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Psychology is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Psychology, Division 54 of the American Psychological Association. The Journal of Pediatric Psychology publishes articles related to theory, research, and professional practice in pediatric psychology. Pediatric psychology is an integrated field of science and practice in which the principles of psychology are applied within the context of pediatric health. The field aims to promote the health and development of children, adolescents, and their families through use of evidence-based methods.
期刊最新文献
"Being alone for a whole year [is hard]" Families reflect on the emotional toll of stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of psychological interventions on anxiety in children and youth with chronic medical conditions. Caregivers' physiological responses during toddler vaccinations: associations with psychological and behavioral responses. Systematic review and meta-analysis of combined cognitive-behavioral therapy and physical activity and exercise interventions for pediatric chronic disease. Temporal summation of pain in sickle cell disease: comparison of adolescents and young adults with chronic vs. infrequent pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1