[Mid Term Results of Treatment of Unstable Slips of Proximal Femoral Epiphysis by Closed Reduction].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.55095/achot2024/025
J Chomiak, M Ošťádal, P Dungl
{"title":"[Mid Term Results of Treatment of Unstable Slips of Proximal Femoral Epiphysis by Closed Reduction].","authors":"J Chomiak, M Ošťádal, P Dungl","doi":"10.55095/achot2024/025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the results of closed reduction and epiphyseodesis of unstable slips of the proximal femoral epiphysis. The hypothesis was that the clinical and radiological results of this method and incidence of avascular necrosis are comparable to the results of closed reduction and open reduction using surgical hip dislocation reported by literature.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In the period 2013-2023, 20 patients were treated for unstable slips in one institution. Whereas the boys were older (mean age of 13.4 years) than girls (mean age of 11.6 years), the gender distribution was equal. Acute on chronic slips prevailed over the acute slips (ratio 3:1). The slips were treated using the closed reduction, transphyseal fixation and capsular decompression at 6 to 240 hours after slip (81 hours on average). All patients were treated concurrently on the contralateral side as the prevention of the slip or to treat the grade I slips (two patients). The follow-up ranged from 7 months to 7 years. Clinical results were evaluated according to two scores: 1) own score (Bulovka University Hopspital score) based on the reduction of ROM, shortening of extremity and limitations of activities; 2) D'Aubigne-Postel score. In the radiological evaluation, correction of slip angle, alpha-angle, avascular necrosis (AVN) and the prominence of the anterior margin of the femoral neck on axial radiographs were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the Bulovka University Hospital score, there were 10 excellent results (50%) with no limitation of activity, including sport, in tree cases the results were very good (15%) and in five cases good (25%), respectively, with some limitation of activity, and two results were unsatisfactory (10%) with severe limitation of activity due to the AVN. According to the D'Aubigne-Postel score, there were 14 excellent results (70%), four good results (20%), and two unsatisfactory results (10%). The slip reduction was as follows: under 20 deg. in five patients; under 30 deg. in 10 patients, and over 30 deg. in five patients, respectively. Alfa-angle was greater than 63 degrees (range 45-88 deg.) on average. Prominence of the off-set epiphysis-femoral neck and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) were observed in six patients. Remodelling of this prominence was seen in one patient four years after surgery. Shortening of the femoral neck over 1 cm was reported in two patients. Complete AVN with severe deformity of the hip was noted in two patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our hypothesis was confirmed because the results of treatment of the unstable slips by closed reduction are comparable with the published results of the same method and with surgical hip dislocation. The results correspond with those of large published cohorts of patients concerning the correction as well as rate of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our results, urgent gentle closed reduction, transphyseal fixation and capsular decompression represent efficient and relatively safe methods of treatment of unstable slips with low incidence of complication. Residual deformity of the off-set epiphysis-femoral neck and FAI represent limitations of this method.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>slipped proximal femoral epiphysis, unstable slips, closed reduction, transphyseal fixation.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"91 4","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2024/025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The study aimed to evaluate the results of closed reduction and epiphyseodesis of unstable slips of the proximal femoral epiphysis. The hypothesis was that the clinical and radiological results of this method and incidence of avascular necrosis are comparable to the results of closed reduction and open reduction using surgical hip dislocation reported by literature.

Material and methods: In the period 2013-2023, 20 patients were treated for unstable slips in one institution. Whereas the boys were older (mean age of 13.4 years) than girls (mean age of 11.6 years), the gender distribution was equal. Acute on chronic slips prevailed over the acute slips (ratio 3:1). The slips were treated using the closed reduction, transphyseal fixation and capsular decompression at 6 to 240 hours after slip (81 hours on average). All patients were treated concurrently on the contralateral side as the prevention of the slip or to treat the grade I slips (two patients). The follow-up ranged from 7 months to 7 years. Clinical results were evaluated according to two scores: 1) own score (Bulovka University Hopspital score) based on the reduction of ROM, shortening of extremity and limitations of activities; 2) D'Aubigne-Postel score. In the radiological evaluation, correction of slip angle, alpha-angle, avascular necrosis (AVN) and the prominence of the anterior margin of the femoral neck on axial radiographs were evaluated.

Results: According to the Bulovka University Hospital score, there were 10 excellent results (50%) with no limitation of activity, including sport, in tree cases the results were very good (15%) and in five cases good (25%), respectively, with some limitation of activity, and two results were unsatisfactory (10%) with severe limitation of activity due to the AVN. According to the D'Aubigne-Postel score, there were 14 excellent results (70%), four good results (20%), and two unsatisfactory results (10%). The slip reduction was as follows: under 20 deg. in five patients; under 30 deg. in 10 patients, and over 30 deg. in five patients, respectively. Alfa-angle was greater than 63 degrees (range 45-88 deg.) on average. Prominence of the off-set epiphysis-femoral neck and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) were observed in six patients. Remodelling of this prominence was seen in one patient four years after surgery. Shortening of the femoral neck over 1 cm was reported in two patients. Complete AVN with severe deformity of the hip was noted in two patients.

Discussion: Our hypothesis was confirmed because the results of treatment of the unstable slips by closed reduction are comparable with the published results of the same method and with surgical hip dislocation. The results correspond with those of large published cohorts of patients concerning the correction as well as rate of complications.

Conclusions: According to our results, urgent gentle closed reduction, transphyseal fixation and capsular decompression represent efficient and relatively safe methods of treatment of unstable slips with low incidence of complication. Residual deformity of the off-set epiphysis-femoral neck and FAI represent limitations of this method.

Key words: slipped proximal femoral epiphysis, unstable slips, closed reduction, transphyseal fixation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[股骨近端骨骺不稳定滑脱闭合复位术治疗的中期结果]。
研究目的该研究旨在评估对不稳定的股骨近端骨骺滑脱进行闭合复位和附骨切除术的结果。假设该方法的临床和放射学结果以及血管性坏死的发生率与文献报道的闭合复位和开放复位手术髋关节脱位的结果相当:2013-2023年期间,一家医疗机构对20名不稳定滑脱患者进行了治疗。虽然男孩(平均年龄为 13.4 岁)比女孩(平均年龄为 11.6 岁)大,但性别分布是平等的。急性和慢性滑脱的比例为 3:1。滑脱患者在滑脱后 6 至 240 小时(平均 81 小时)接受闭合复位、经骨膜固定和关节囊减压治疗。所有患者都同时接受了对侧治疗,以预防滑脱或治疗 I 级滑脱(两名患者)。随访时间从 7 个月到 7 年不等。临床结果根据两个评分进行评估:1)根据肢体活动度减少、肢体缩短和活动受限情况进行的自身评分(Bulovka 大学医院评分);2)D'Aubigne-Postel 评分。在放射学评估中,对滑脱角、α角、血管性坏死(AVN)的矫正情况以及轴向X光片上股骨颈前缘的突出程度进行了评估:根据布洛夫卡大学医院的评分结果,10 例手术效果极佳(50%),活动(包括体育运动)不受限制;分别有两例手术效果非常好(15%)和五例手术效果良好(25%),但活动受到一定限制;两例手术效果不理想(10%),由于股骨头坏死,活动受到严重限制。根据 D'Aubigne-Postel 评分,有 14 例效果极佳(70%),4 例效果良好(20%),2 例效果不佳(10%)。滑脱减少情况如下:5 名患者的滑脱程度低于 20 度;10 名患者的滑脱程度低于 30 度;5 名患者的滑脱程度超过 30 度。Alfa角平均大于63度(范围为45-88度)。在六名患者中观察到骨骺-股骨颈偏移突出和股骨髋臼撞击(FAI)。一名患者在术后四年出现了突出的重塑。两名患者的股骨颈缩短超过 1 厘米。两名患者的髋关节出现了严重畸形的完全性无睾丸症:我们的假设得到了证实,因为通过闭合复位术治疗不稳定滑脱的结果与已发表的相同方法和手术髋关节脱位的结果相当。在矫正效果和并发症发生率方面,结果与已发表的大型患者群体的结果一致:根据我们的研究结果,紧急轻柔闭合复位、经骨膜固定和关节囊减压是治疗不稳定滑脱的有效且相对安全的方法,并发症发生率较低。关键字:股骨近端骨骺滑脱、不稳定滑脱、闭合复位、经骨骺固定术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
期刊最新文献
[Arthroscopic Subtalar Distraction Arthrodesis in Post-Traumatic Indications]. [Sagittal Profi le of the Spine in Patients after Lumbar Stabilisation Surgeries]. [Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the AMIS Method: Surgical Technique, Suitability of This Method for Obese Patients, Evaluation of the Study Population]. Management of Length Unstable Femur Fractures in Children by Flexible Intramedullary Nails: A Systematic Review. Reconstruction after Pelvic Bone Massive Resection: Evolution and Actuality of 3D-Printing Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1