Assessing ChatGPT's summarization of 68Ga PSMA PET/CT reports for patients.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04619-8
Ogün Bülbül, Hande Melike Bülbül, Esat Kaba
{"title":"Assessing ChatGPT's summarization of <sup>68</sup>Ga PSMA PET/CT reports for patients.","authors":"Ogün Bülbül, Hande Melike Bülbül, Esat Kaba","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04619-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>ChatGPT has recently been the subject of many studies, and its responses to medical questions have been successful. We examined ChatGPT-4's evaluation of structured <sup>68</sup>Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT reports of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><sup>68</sup>Ga PSMA PET/CT reports of 164 patients were entered to ChatGPT-4. ChatGPT-4 was asked to respond the following questions according to the PET/CT reports: 1-Has the cancer in the prostate extended to organs adjacent to the prostate? 2-Has the cancer in the prostate spread to neighboring lymph nodes? 3-Has the cancer in the prostate spread to lymph nodes in distant areas? 4-Has the cancer in the prostate spread to the bones? 5-Has the cancer in the prostate spread to other organs? ChatGPT-4's responses were scored on a Likert-type scale for clarity and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean scores for clarity were 4.93 ± 0.32, 4.95 ± 0.25, 4.96 ± 0.19, 4.99 ± 0.11, and 4.96 ± 0.30, respectively. The mean scores for accuracy were 4.87 ∓ 0.61, 4.87 ∓ 0.62, 4.79 ± 0.83, 4.96 ± 0.25, and 4.93 ± 0.45, respectively. Patients with distant lymphatic metastases had a lower mean accuracy score than those without (4.28 ± 1.45 vs. 4.94 ± 0.39; p < 0.001). ChatGPT-4's responses in 13 patients (8%) had the potential for harmful information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT-4 successfully interprets structured <sup>68</sup>Ga PSMA PET/CT reports of reports of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. However, it is unlikely that ChatGPT-4 evaluations will replace physicians' evaluations today, especially since it can produce fabricated information.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04619-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: ChatGPT has recently been the subject of many studies, and its responses to medical questions have been successful. We examined ChatGPT-4's evaluation of structured 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT reports of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Methods: 68Ga PSMA PET/CT reports of 164 patients were entered to ChatGPT-4. ChatGPT-4 was asked to respond the following questions according to the PET/CT reports: 1-Has the cancer in the prostate extended to organs adjacent to the prostate? 2-Has the cancer in the prostate spread to neighboring lymph nodes? 3-Has the cancer in the prostate spread to lymph nodes in distant areas? 4-Has the cancer in the prostate spread to the bones? 5-Has the cancer in the prostate spread to other organs? ChatGPT-4's responses were scored on a Likert-type scale for clarity and accuracy.

Results: The mean scores for clarity were 4.93 ± 0.32, 4.95 ± 0.25, 4.96 ± 0.19, 4.99 ± 0.11, and 4.96 ± 0.30, respectively. The mean scores for accuracy were 4.87 ∓ 0.61, 4.87 ∓ 0.62, 4.79 ± 0.83, 4.96 ± 0.25, and 4.93 ± 0.45, respectively. Patients with distant lymphatic metastases had a lower mean accuracy score than those without (4.28 ± 1.45 vs. 4.94 ± 0.39; p < 0.001). ChatGPT-4's responses in 13 patients (8%) had the potential for harmful information.

Conclusion: ChatGPT-4 successfully interprets structured 68Ga PSMA PET/CT reports of reports of newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. However, it is unlikely that ChatGPT-4 evaluations will replace physicians' evaluations today, especially since it can produce fabricated information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 ChatGPT 为患者汇总 68Ga PSMA PET/CT 报告的情况。
目的:ChatGPT 最近成为许多研究的主题,它对医学问题的回答也很成功。我们研究了 ChatGPT-4 对新诊断的前列腺癌患者的结构化 68Ga 前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET/CT 报告的评估。根据 PET/CT 报告,要求 ChatGPT-4 回答以下问题:1-前列腺癌是否已扩展至前列腺邻近器官?2-前列腺癌是否扩散到邻近淋巴结?3-前列腺癌是否扩散到远处的淋巴结?4-前列腺癌是否已扩散至骨骼?5-前列腺癌是否已扩散到其他器官?对 ChatGPT-4 的回答采用李克特量表对清晰度和准确度进行评分:清晰度的平均得分分别为 4.93 ± 0.32、4.95 ± 0.25、4.96 ± 0.19、4.99 ± 0.11 和 4.96 ± 0.30。准确性的平均得分分别为 4.87 ∓ 0.61、4.87 ∓ 0.62、4.79 ± 0.83、4.96 ± 0.25 和 4.93 ± 0.45。有远处淋巴转移的患者的平均准确度评分低于无远处淋巴转移的患者(4.28 ± 1.45 vs. 4.94 ± 0.39;P 结论:ChatGPT-4 能成功解释癌症:ChatGPT-4 可成功解释新诊断前列腺癌患者的结构化 68Ga PSMA PET/CT 报告。不过,ChatGPT-4 评估不太可能取代现在的医生评估,尤其是因为它可能会产生捏造的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Renovascular hypertension - a primer for the radiologist. Assessment of high-risk gastroesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients using quantitative parameters from dual-source dual-energy CT. Dynamic changes of radiological and radiomics patterns based on MRI in viable hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization. Enhancing bone metastasis prediction in prostate cancer using quantitative mpMRI features, ISUP grade and PSA density: a machine learning approach. Exam quality of ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced abbreviated MRI and impact on early-stage HCC detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1