Exploring Effects of Race and Differential Item Functioning on PrEP Stigma Experiences: Implications for Latent Stigma Measurement in Racially and Sexually Diverse Populations.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AIDS and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s10461-024-04499-5
Allysha C Maragh-Bass, Aaron J Siegler, Kenneth H Mayer, Akilah Dulin, Jessica Sales, Daniel Stegmueller
{"title":"Exploring Effects of Race and Differential Item Functioning on PrEP Stigma Experiences: Implications for Latent Stigma Measurement in Racially and Sexually Diverse Populations.","authors":"Allysha C Maragh-Bass, Aaron J Siegler, Kenneth H Mayer, Akilah Dulin, Jessica Sales, Daniel Stegmueller","doi":"10.1007/s10461-024-04499-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PrEP stigma measurement remains a challenge to the validity of studies and interventions addressing HIV prevention. It may lead to inaccurate assessment of the relationship between PrEP stigma and health outcomes such as PrEP persistence and care retention in groups experiencing HIV-related inequities. The present research explored the psychometric properties of a novel IV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) stigma scale in a cohort of racially diverse men who have sex with men (MSM). Using item response theory, analyses explored presence of differential item functioning (DIF) among Black and White respondents. Participants completed baseline surveys measuring psychosocial factors, sociodemographic factors, and PrEP stigma items. The primary analysis used a machine learning approach to assess (a) the presence of DIF; and (b) compare latent stigma between Black and White respondents, after correcting for any DIF. The model identified four out of 13 scale items as having a high probability of DIF for Black respondents, which is relatively good given that the original PrEP stigma scale was neither designed nor tested for validation comparing Black and White respondents. The DIF-adjusted latent PrEP stigma measure reveals statistically and substantially significantly higher levels of stigma for Black compared to White respondents (Diff.: 1.05 +/- 0.19). While most items performed well, findings demonstrate the importance of assessing measurement error in populations where stigma is rampant and being studied or intervened upon (and in this case, where multilevel and intersectional stigma may be present).</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04499-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PrEP stigma measurement remains a challenge to the validity of studies and interventions addressing HIV prevention. It may lead to inaccurate assessment of the relationship between PrEP stigma and health outcomes such as PrEP persistence and care retention in groups experiencing HIV-related inequities. The present research explored the psychometric properties of a novel IV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) stigma scale in a cohort of racially diverse men who have sex with men (MSM). Using item response theory, analyses explored presence of differential item functioning (DIF) among Black and White respondents. Participants completed baseline surveys measuring psychosocial factors, sociodemographic factors, and PrEP stigma items. The primary analysis used a machine learning approach to assess (a) the presence of DIF; and (b) compare latent stigma between Black and White respondents, after correcting for any DIF. The model identified four out of 13 scale items as having a high probability of DIF for Black respondents, which is relatively good given that the original PrEP stigma scale was neither designed nor tested for validation comparing Black and White respondents. The DIF-adjusted latent PrEP stigma measure reveals statistically and substantially significantly higher levels of stigma for Black compared to White respondents (Diff.: 1.05 +/- 0.19). While most items performed well, findings demonstrate the importance of assessing measurement error in populations where stigma is rampant and being studied or intervened upon (and in this case, where multilevel and intersectional stigma may be present).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索种族和项目功能差异对 PrEP 耻辱体验的影响:在种族和性别多元化人群中进行潜在污名测量的意义》(Implications for Latent Stigma Measurement in Racially and Sex Diverse Populations)。
PrEP 耻辱测量仍然是对艾滋病预防研究和干预措施有效性的挑战。它可能会导致对 PrEP 耻辱感与健康结果之间关系的不准确评估,如在经历艾滋病相关不平等的群体中,PrEP 的持续性和护理保留率。本研究探讨了新型静脉注射暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)污名化量表在不同种族男男性行为者(MSM)群体中的心理测量特性。利用项目反应理论,分析探讨了黑人和白人受访者中是否存在项目功能差异(DIF)。参与者完成了测量社会心理因素、社会人口因素和 PrEP 耻辱感项目的基线调查。主要分析使用机器学习方法来评估:(a) 是否存在 DIF;(b) 在校正任何 DIF 后,比较黑人和白人受访者之间的潜在污名。该模型发现,在 13 个量表项目中,有 4 个项目对黑人受访者而言具有较高的 DIF 可能性,鉴于最初的 PrEP 耻辱量表既未设计,也未对黑人和白人受访者进行验证测试,因此这一结果相对较好。经 DIF 调整的潜在 PrEP 耻辱度量表显示,与白人受访者相比,黑人受访者的 耻辱度在统计学上显著更高(差值:1.05 +/-0.19)。虽然大多数项目表现良好,但研究结果表明,在污名化现象猖獗、正在对其进行研究或干预的人群中,评估测量误差非常重要(在这种情况下,可能存在多层次和交叉性污名化)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
期刊最新文献
Family Social Support Mediates the Relationship Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Psychosocial well-being in a Cohort of Young South Africans Newly Diagnosed with HIV. Equal Access, Equal Outcomes: Telehealth Utilization Around the COVID-19 Pandemic among People Living with HIV and Opioid Use Disorder in the Deep South. Health Care Service Utilization Among People with HIV, Chronic Pain, and Depression: Utilization and Cost Outcomes from the HIV-PASS Study. Life Course Stressors, Latent Coping Strategies, Alcohol Use, and Latent Coping Strategies Among People with HIV. Persistence With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in an Active-Duty Military Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1