Preferences for Delivery of HIV Prevention Services Among Healthcare Users in South Africa: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AIDS and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s10461-024-04519-4
Catherine Elizabeth Martin, Duane Blaauw, Pelisa Nongena, Glory Chidumwa, Siphokazi Dada, Samantha Jack, Vusile Butler, Saiqa Mullick
{"title":"Preferences for Delivery of HIV Prevention Services Among Healthcare Users in South Africa: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Catherine Elizabeth Martin, Duane Blaauw, Pelisa Nongena, Glory Chidumwa, Siphokazi Dada, Samantha Jack, Vusile Butler, Saiqa Mullick","doi":"10.1007/s10461-024-04519-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Progress has been made to scale oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as part of combination HIV prevention, with the WHO recommending differentiated, simplified and demedicalized approaches. This study explored user preferences for components of a PrEP service delivery package, through a discrete choice experiment (DCE) among 307 people accessing primary healthcare services in South Africa between November 2022 and February 2023. Attributes included were: Source of information about HIV prevention and PrEP; Site for PrEP initiation and follow-up; Frequency of follow-up; PrEP pick-up point; HIV testing whilst using PrEP; Contact between appointments. A D-efficient DCE design was created with 16 choice sets in 2 blocks. DCE data were analysed using generalised multinomial logistic models. Compared to printed materials, participants preferred getting information about PrEP online (aOR = 7.73, 95% CI = 5.13-11.66) and through WhatsApp (aOR = 2.23, 95% CI = 0.98-5.55). PrEP initiation at a pharmacy or mobile clinic was valued equally to initiating PrEP at a clinic, but a community pop-up site was less preferred (aOR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33-0.64). There was a preference for 6-monthly over 3-monthly follow-up (aOR = 11.88, 95% CI = 5.44-25.94). Participants preferred collecting PrEP from a pharmacy (aOR = 5.02, 95% CI = 3.45-7.31), through home delivery (aOR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.26-3.78) and from a vending machine (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.02-1.99) relative to where they initiated PrEP. Participants also preferred HIV self-testing over a healthcare provider test (aOR = 5.57, 95% CI = 3.72, 8.36). WhatsApp or Facebook groups (aOR = 4.12, 95% CI = 3.00-5.67), monthly phone calls (aOR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.73-4.67) and weekly messages (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.10-1.97) were preferred contact between appointments, relative to no contact. To meet users' preferences, there is a need to expand decentralised and self-led HIV prevention services.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04519-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Progress has been made to scale oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as part of combination HIV prevention, with the WHO recommending differentiated, simplified and demedicalized approaches. This study explored user preferences for components of a PrEP service delivery package, through a discrete choice experiment (DCE) among 307 people accessing primary healthcare services in South Africa between November 2022 and February 2023. Attributes included were: Source of information about HIV prevention and PrEP; Site for PrEP initiation and follow-up; Frequency of follow-up; PrEP pick-up point; HIV testing whilst using PrEP; Contact between appointments. A D-efficient DCE design was created with 16 choice sets in 2 blocks. DCE data were analysed using generalised multinomial logistic models. Compared to printed materials, participants preferred getting information about PrEP online (aOR = 7.73, 95% CI = 5.13-11.66) and through WhatsApp (aOR = 2.23, 95% CI = 0.98-5.55). PrEP initiation at a pharmacy or mobile clinic was valued equally to initiating PrEP at a clinic, but a community pop-up site was less preferred (aOR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.33-0.64). There was a preference for 6-monthly over 3-monthly follow-up (aOR = 11.88, 95% CI = 5.44-25.94). Participants preferred collecting PrEP from a pharmacy (aOR = 5.02, 95% CI = 3.45-7.31), through home delivery (aOR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.26-3.78) and from a vending machine (aOR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.02-1.99) relative to where they initiated PrEP. Participants also preferred HIV self-testing over a healthcare provider test (aOR = 5.57, 95% CI = 3.72, 8.36). WhatsApp or Facebook groups (aOR = 4.12, 95% CI = 3.00-5.67), monthly phone calls (aOR = 2.84, 95% CI = 1.73-4.67) and weekly messages (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.10-1.97) were preferred contact between appointments, relative to no contact. To meet users' preferences, there is a need to expand decentralised and self-led HIV prevention services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非医疗用户对提供艾滋病预防服务的偏好:离散选择实验。
作为艾滋病综合预防的一部分,口服暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)的推广取得了进展,世卫组织建议采用差异化、简化和去医疗化的方法。本研究通过离散选择实验(DCE),对 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月期间在南非接受初级医疗保健服务的 307 人进行了调查,探讨了用户对 PrEP 服务包组成部分的偏好。实验包括以下属性有关艾滋病预防和 PrEP 的信息来源;PrEP 的启动和随访地点;随访频率;PrEP 取药点;使用 PrEP 时的 HIV 检测;预约之间的联系。在 2 个区块中设置了 16 个选择集,采用 D 效率 DCE 设计。采用广义多项式逻辑模型对 DCE 数据进行了分析。与印刷材料相比,参与者更倾向于通过网络(aOR = 7.73,95% CI = 5.13-11.66)和 WhatsApp(aOR = 2.23,95% CI = 0.98-5.55)获取 PrEP 信息。在药房或流动诊所启动 PrEP 的价值与在诊所启动 PrEP 的价值相同,但在社区弹出式站点启动 PrEP 的价值较低(aOR = 0.46,95% CI = 0.33-0.64)。6 个月一次的随访比 3 个月一次的随访更受欢迎(aOR = 11.88,95% CI = 5.44-25.94)。相对于开始使用 PrEP 的地点,参与者更倾向于从药店(aOR = 5.02,95% CI = 3.45-7.31)、送货上门(aOR = 2.18,95% CI = 1.26-3.78)和自动售货机(aOR = 1.43,95% CI = 1.02-1.99)领取 PrEP。相对于医疗服务提供者的检测,参与者也更愿意进行 HIV 自我检测(aOR = 5.57,95% CI = 3.72,8.36)。相对于不联系,WhatsApp 或 Facebook 群组(aOR = 4.12,95% CI = 3.00-5.67)、每月电话(aOR = 2.84,95% CI = 1.73-4.67)和每周信息(aOR = 1.47,95% CI = 1.10-1.97)是预约之间的首选联系方式。为了满足用户的偏好,有必要扩大分散和自我主导的艾滋病预防服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
期刊最新文献
Family Social Support Mediates the Relationship Between the COVID-19 Pandemic and Psychosocial well-being in a Cohort of Young South Africans Newly Diagnosed with HIV. Equal Access, Equal Outcomes: Telehealth Utilization Around the COVID-19 Pandemic among People Living with HIV and Opioid Use Disorder in the Deep South. Health Care Service Utilization Among People with HIV, Chronic Pain, and Depression: Utilization and Cost Outcomes from the HIV-PASS Study. Life Course Stressors, Latent Coping Strategies, Alcohol Use, and Latent Coping Strategies Among People with HIV. Persistence With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in an Active-Duty Military Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1